Want to retire wealthy? Stop making this one investment mistake

Are you making this one critical mistake that could be holding back your retirement plans?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Every investor has the tools at their disposal to make a fortune in the stock market. The problem is, while the tools are there, most investors make severe mistakes throughout their investing career, which cost them dearly. 

And there’s one crucial mistake that’s more damaging than all of the others put together. 

Rule one: Don’t lose money 

The most prominent mistake investors tend to make is losing money. At first, this might seem like an obvious statement to make. No one wants to lose money, and if there was a way to invest that is 100% risk-free, I’m sure every investor would jump at the chance. 

However, there’s a bit more to this statement than first meets the eye. 

You see, a large percentage of investors believe that volatility defines risk. The more volatile the stock, the more risk it has. But that isn’t the right way of thinking about the market. Instead, the world’s best investors define risk as the chance of losing 100% of your invested capital. 

The trick is to focus on how much you could lose from any investment, not how much you could gain. For example, that AIM mining stock might be worth 20 times its value IF it strikes gold. But what are the chances of everything going to plan? 

According to one set of analysts, the percentage of small mining companies that can successfully find, explore, develop a mine and start producing, is around 2%. So, in this scenario, you have a 98% chance of losing money and a 2% chance of making money. 

This is an imperfect example, but I think it’s a great way of showing how vital it is to consider how much you stand to lose with investment opportunity before taking the plunge. 

Twice as hard 

Another thing to consider with losses is that it’s twice as hard to make money back you’ve lost. If that AIM mining stock falls 60%, and you lose 60% of your capital, it will take a return of 150% to make your money back. 

If the investment is a complete disaster and you lose 98% of your hard earned money, to get back to the starting point, you’ll have to find an investment that produces a return of 4,900%! That’s virtually impossible. 

Conclusion 

So, how can you avoid breaking investing’s rule number one? The best way is to stick to established businesses and FTSE 100 constituents are a great example. Royal Dutch Shell, for example, has been producing returns for investors for more than seven decades. British American Tobacco has a similar record. The company’s share price might have declined over the past few months, but the risks of investors losing everything are slim. 

Another alternative is to use a simple index tracker fund. A FTSE 250 fund gives you instant exposure to the UK’s top 250 listed companies. This diversification means that the chances of investors suffering a 100% loss is virtually zero. 

Put simply, it’s possible to avoid investment losses if you avoid the riskiest companies, and stick with the market’s long-term winners. 

Rupert Hargreaves owns shares in Royal Dutch Shell and British American Tobacco. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Dividend Shares

How much do you need in an ISA to make £1,000 of passive income in 2026?

Jon Smith looks at how an investor could go from a standing start to generating £1,000 in passive income for…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Can the Lloyds share price hit £1.30 in 2026?

Can the Lloyds share price reproduce its 2025 performance in the year ahead? Stephen Wright thinks investors shouldn’t be too…

Read more »

Young woman working at modern office. Technical price graph and indicator, red and green candlestick chart and stock trading computer screen background.
Investing Articles

Down 45%, is it time to consider buying shares in this dominant tech company?

In today’s stock market, it’s worth looking for opportunities to buy shares created by investors being more confident about AI…

Read more »

A rear view of a female in a bright yellow coat walking along the historic street known as The Shambles in York, UK which is a popular tourist destination in this Yorkshire city.
Investing Articles

Is the BP share price about to shock us all in 2026?

Can the BP share price perform strongly again next year? Or could the FTSE 100 oil giant be facing a…

Read more »

Light trails from traffic moving down The Mound in central Edinburgh, Scotland during December
Investing Articles

£5,000 put into Nvidia stock could be worth this much by next Christmas…

Nvidia stock is set to rise significantly for the sixth calendar year in seven. But does Wall Street see Nvidia…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Looking for New Year growth stocks? Here’s an epic bargain to discover

This FTSE 250 share has more than doubled in 2025. Here's why our writer believes it remains one of the…

Read more »

Night Takeoff Of The American Space Shuttle
Investing Articles

4 mega-cheap growth shares to consider for 2026!

Discover four top growth shares that our writer Royston Wild thinks may be too cheap to ignore. Could these UK…

Read more »

Tesla car at super charger station
Investing Articles

Can Tesla stock do it again in 2026?

Tesla stock has been on fire (again) in 2025. Might we say the same thing this time next year? Paul…

Read more »