Manchester United PLC Transfer News: Man Utd Wages Show Little Room to Manoeuver

This article was originally published on Fool.com Manchester United  (NYSE: MANU.US) spent £150 million last summer on transfers. With the transfer …

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

This article was originally published on Fool.com

Manchester United  (NYSE: MANU.US) spent £150 million last summer on transfers. With the transfer window back open until Feb. 2nd and the rumor mill in full swing, it’s a good time to look at how the various FA and UEFA rules on spending and costs could affect the club. Making some basic assumptions, my analysis shows Manchester United doesn’t have much room to maneuver in this transfer window.

With Victor Valdes recently signing on with a free transfer, the most popular rumors now revolve around:

  • Ron Vlaar from Aston Villa
  • Ilkay Gundogan and Mats Hummels from Borussia Dortmund
  • Raphael Varane from Real Madrid
  • Kevin Stootman from Roma
  • Paul Pogba from Juventus

Besides a transfer of Ron Vlaar — which is possible, particularly if Aston Villa wants some money instead of letting him go on a free transfer at the end of the season — the rest of the players are surely needed by their respective clubs and would be too expensive for Manchester United to acquire.

Financially, there are four things for the club to consider when looking at transfer spending moving forward: UEFA’s Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations and then Premier League’s home grown talent rule, wage uplift rule, and break-even rule.

Break-even tests

UEFA FFP and the Premier League break-even rules are similar. While UEFA FFP regulations don’t apply this season, assuming Manchester United qualifies for European play in 2015, this season’s decisions will matter.

Manchester United revenue is expected to drop £40 million to £50 million just from missing out on the Champions League this season. At the same time, expenses have risen after the club signed multiple players. However, the steady increase in revenue from sponsorships, which should rise nearly 25% this season to £170 million as a result of the notable $70 (£46) million a year Chevy kit sponsorship, means the club will be close to breakeven this season.

With both break-even rules measured over a three year period — Manchester United has been profitable the past two years — basically any spending during this transfer window won’t affect either break-even test for next year. You can read more about Manchester United transfers, financial fair play, and the break-even tests in my upcoming article.

Homegrown talent 

The next rule teams need to keep in mind for transfers and squad composition is the homegrown talent rule, which requires teams to have 8 “homegrown” players in order to have a full 25-man roster of players over the age of 21. Without getting into all the details, Manchester United is well above that threshold with 11 qualifying players, so the roster is unaffected.

Wage uplift

The Premier League’s wage uplift rule is the one area that may impact the team during this transfer window. While fans are hoping for a big money signing announcement, this seems unlikely under the wage uplift rule unless another player is transferred out at the same time.

The wage uplift rule was started as part of the Premier League’s “short term cost control” — it compares the total player wages ending in each season against the benchmark year. The 2012 to 2013 season currently serves as the benchmark, and the rule applies to the seasons ending in 2014, 2015, and 2016.

When you compare player wages to the benchmark year, they can either:

  • Be £4 million per year higher than the benchmark year. So for the 2014 to 2015 season, that means they can only be £8 million above the wages in the 2012 to 2013 season,
  • Or wages can be higher than the rule if the increase is funded by the club’s “own revenue,” which includes essentially all revenue besides Premier League TV money and includes profit from player sales.

For Manchester United, total “own revenue” was £301 million in the 2012 to 2013 season. With the team not making the Champions League, I expect “own revenue” including profit from player sales to be around £315 million to £325 million for this season. So Manchester United’s player wages are allowed to be £14 million to £24 million above the 2012 to 2013 level.

There are two things to note:

  1. It is remarkable that Manchester United’s own revenue is up despite the approximate £50 million hit the club is taking from not making the Champions League. This shows how exceptional the organization is when it comes to generating commercial and sponsorship revenue.
  2. The “wage uplift rule” applies only to player wages, not staff wages.

The mistake I’ve seen a few analysts make is to simply pull wages from the annual report, but that number includes all the wages and social security costs for the club’s 800-plus employees and 2,300 temporary staff, in addition to the 49 players on the first team squad.

So we have to make some adjustments to estimate the player wage uplift.

Club wages and salaries were £158 million in the 2012 to 2013 season. At the end of last season, Manchester United added 16 coaching, 13 commercial, 22 media, and 78 other staff for a total of 126 new employees compared to the 2012-2013 season. Using the club guidance for wages and assuming the employee numbers are unchanged, we can back out the social security costs and some other small costs, so my estimate of wages and salaries is £175 million to £182 million for the 2014 to 2015 season.

So the total wage uplift is £17 million to £24 million. However, we need to back out the added non-player employees’ wages. Assuming an average £60,000 salary across the 126 employees, we get £7.5 million.

That means player wages rose around £10 million to £17 million. To summarize:

(in millions) 2012 to 2013
Benchmark
2013 to 2014 2014 to 2015
(Estimates)
“Own Revenue” £301.4 £350.4 £315 to £325
“Own Revenue Uplift”   £49.0 £14 to £24
       
Wages and Salaries £158.0 £189.2 £175 to £182
Estimated non-player wage increase   £7.5 £7.5
Estimated Player Wage Increase   £23.6 £10 to £17

Source: Manchester United 20-F, FQ4 2014 guidance, and author estimates.

With the player wage increase estimated at £10 million to £17 million and “own revenue” up only £14 million to £24 million, that leaves little room for a major signing, unless there is also an accompanying sale or player loan.

Manchester United transfers going forward

While the January transfer window is limited, things look good for this summer, regardless of whether the club makes the Champions League or not. The £75 million a year Adidas deal will provide a big boost to revenue starting next season, and the club will surely add more sponsors to increase revenue between then and now. In the meantime, Ed Woodward and the Glazers have invested the club’s finances well over the past eight years, and they should continue to do so going forward.

Dan Dzombak has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Young Caucasian girl showing and pointing up with fingers number three against yellow background
Investing Articles

3 top FTSE 250 growth stocks to consider for an ISA today

Here are three excellent stocks from the FTSE 250 that are trading at reasonable valuations considering their growth potential.

Read more »

Investing Articles

Fancy £5,000 of monthly passive income? It’s possible…

Dr James Fox explains how investors can work toward earning a passive income worth £60,000 per year through a Stocks…

Read more »

Entrepreneur on the phone.
Investing Articles

I’m ignoring buy-to-let in 2026 and buying this REIT for passive income!

REITs are my favourite tax-efficient way to generate healthy streams of passive income from UK real estate. Here’s one of…

Read more »

A pastel colored growing graph with rising rocket.
Investing Articles

Up 887% with a P/E of just 8! Meet the eye-popping FTSE 100 bank that’s smashing Rolls-Royce

Investors looking to diversify beyond the big FTSE 100 banks may be tempted by this high-flying upstart. But they may…

Read more »

Senior woman potting plant in garden at home
Investing Articles

Here’s why SIPP investors love these 2 top UK dividend stocks

Mark Hartley explains the enduring popularity behind two UK dividend shares that feature frequently in SIPPs. Is the market right…

Read more »

Group of friends talking by pool side
Investing Articles

7.89% yield! Should I buy this FTSE 100 dividend stock?

Is this FTSE 100 dividend stock with its massive 7.89% yield too good to ignore? Or are there hidden risks…

Read more »

Illustration of flames over a black background
Investing Articles

A once-in-a-decade chance to earn a sky-high passive income from these red-hot FTSE 250 stocks?

Harvey Jones says investors looking for passive income should consider these three high yielders that have swung back into fashion…

Read more »

Three generation family are playing football together in a field. There are two boys, their father and their grandfather.
Investing Articles

How to try and turn a £5k ISA into a £1,044.22 yearly second income

Dividends can generate a superb and reliable second income that grows over time. Zaven Boyrazian explains how, and which UK…

Read more »