GlaxoSmithKline shares: why I’m not buying

GlaxoSmithKline has been popular with investors for decades. Despite this, Dan Peeke is wary of investing in the pharmaceutical giant.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Since being founded in 2000, GlaxoSmithKline (LSE:GSK) has expanded to become the sixth-largest pharmaceutical company in the world, according to Forbes. It also has the fourth-largest market cap in the London Stock Exchange at £81bn. Many of my colleagues at The Motley Fool believe this is just the start of its recovery and are keen to invest in GlaxoSmithKline shares. I can understand why.

The case for GlaxoSmithKline shares

Cliff D’Arcy has been invested in the company for three decades. Despite his long-standing disappointment with GlaxoSmithKline shares – it is down £1 on its price 25 years ago – he is hanging on thanks to the potentially promising involvement of activist hedge fund Elliott Management.

Elliott’s aggressive activist involvement should encourage the company to increase its value. This should, in turn, increase the worth of its shares. The level of confidence displayed by the hedge fund through a nine-figure investment should hopefully lead to good things.  

On top of this, GlaxoSmithKline shares have risen by more than 12% in the last two months. It also currently boasts a dividend yield of about 6%. One could conclude that now is a great time to buy a cheap stake in a huge company.  

Why I’m not keen

As mentioned, its long-term performance has been pretty terrible. Many investors remaining from the last century are currently sitting on a loss. Even with Elliott on board, if the company hasn’t been able to grow in twenty-five years, there are certainly no guarantees now.

It also missed out on the chance to develop its own Covid-19 vaccine. This was a big factor in the recovery of other FTSE 100 pharma companies like AstraZeneca (LSE:AZN). Its low last March was £62.21, with its price currently up 23% to £76.93. GlaxoSmithKline shares hit £13.74 in March 2020 and have dropped by 3% since then.

With the current focus on Covid-19, I’m more inclined to follow the recovery of the companies working in that field.

The pandemic also reduced revenue from sales of non-Covid-19 vaccines by 32% as they were put on the backburner. It was even hit with a 19% drop in over-the-counter sales as more common illnesses became less prominent thanks to social distancing. This led to an 18% drop in revenue in Q1 of 2021 in comparison to the same period in 2021.

GlaxoSmithKline shares aren’t benefitting from other issues within the company either. Bintrafusp alfa – a cancer drug – failed an important trial in January, and a promising partnership with Sanofi has been hit with more delays.

Even GSK’s dividend is probably going to be cut. The firm plans to split in two in order to focus on consumer health in one division, and on HIV, vaccines, and pharmaceuticals in the other. This split would likely mean that it would no longer reach its current dividend yield.

For these reasons, I’ll be avoiding GlaxoSmithKline shares for the time being. As mentioned above, though, there are many factors to reconsider once the uncertainty of Covid-19 is a distant memory. 

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Dan Peeke has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

£11,000 tucked away? Here’s how I’d aim to turn that into a passive income worth nearly £17,000 a year!

This Fool wouldn't leave his cash sitting in the bank. Instead, he'd invest in the stock market to start making…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 cracking dividend shares I’m eyeing for my portfolio

This Fool takes a closer look at two dividend shares he's got on his watchlist. He believes they could make…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

No savings after inflation? I’d use the Warren Buffett method to build wealth

I think this trio of investing principles from billionaire Warren Buffett could be the key to recovering from the UK…

Read more »

Investing Articles

UK REITs: a rare passive income opportunity right now

UK REITs have taken a serious beating over the last two years, and they now could be some of the…

Read more »

Investing Articles

How I’m investing in dividend stocks to aim for £100 weekly passive income

Earning a passive income from dividend stocks isn’t complicated, says Zaven Boyrazian, as he breaks down how he’d target making…

Read more »

Investing Articles

1,043 National Grid shares could make £3,292 a year in passive income!

National Grid shares deliver a high yield that can generate significant passive income, especially if the dividends are used to…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Is the Rolls-Royce share price ready to break through 500p?

Rolls-Royce is part-way through a multi-year transformation programme. Our writer explores if its share price has room to fly.

Read more »

Young mixed-race woman jumping for joy in a park with confetti falling around her
Investing Articles

How I’d invest £20k in a Stocks and Shares ISA to target £951,608

There are more than 4,000 ISA millionaires in the UK. Our writer outlines his plan and looks at a top…

Read more »