Up +10% in 2020, but I’m bearish on Polar Capital

I wouldn’t be fooled by Polar Capital’s recent interim results… Nadia Yaqub takes a closer look at why the shares are a risky investment.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Recent half-year results saw AIM asset manager Polar Capital (LSE: POLR) report strong inflows into its funds. In the six months to September 2020, Polar Capital’s assets under management (AUM) jumped 34% from £12.2bn to £16.4bn.

Several funds outperformed their respective benchmarks; however, the AUM spike was due to the technology and healthcare strategies. In the six-month period, the Global Technology Fund saw the largest inflow of £1.2bn followed by the Healthcare Opportunities Fund and Biotechnology Fund benefitting from £120m and £198m of net inflows respectively.

The tech boom

It is no surprise why the £5.7bn Global Technology Fund, managed by Ben Rogoff and Nick Evans, has performed well during the global pandemic. As people have been forced to work from home due to Coronavirus, the need for technology has increased. The portfolio consisting of stocks such as Microsoft and Amazon has benefitted from the Covid-19 tech boom.

In June 2020, Rogoff and Evans announced they were to soft-close the Global Technology fund after it had gained strong investor interest during the Coronavirus crisis. This was done to allow the fund managers to continue to meet their investment objective and deliver future returns.

While the open-end Global Technology Fund may be closed to new investors, Rogoff and Evans also manage the Polar Capital Technology Trust.

Concentration risk

While the Global Technology Fund has delivered stellar performance, investors must be aware that there is concentration risk. This investment strategy now accounts for 55% of the firm’s total AUM. The healthcare funds account for 16% of Polar Capital’s AUM.

Not only does Polar Capital have all its eggs in the Global Technology Fund, but the investment strategy is also concentrated. The top 10 holdings, including Apple and Facebook, make up 40% of the fund. The strategy also has a 69% geographical exposure to the US.

An attractive dividend

In its last financial year, the company returned a total dividend of 33p per share to its shareholders. At the time of writing, this gives Polar Capital a dividend yield of approximately 5%.

The asset manager also increased its interim dividend 12.5% to 9p per share from 8p per share a year ago. For the income-hungry investor, an AIM stock that generates a 5% dividend yield is attractive, but I believe this comes at a cost.

My bearish view

Polar Capital heavily relies on the technology strategy to generate management fees. When the wheels fall of the Coronavirus tech boom, Polar Capital’s revenue is likely to be negatively impacted.

In October 2020, Polar Capital acquired the International Value and World Value team from Los Angeles asset manager First Pacific Advisors LP. Polar Capital now has access to a US 40 Act Mutual Fund range, which will enable the attraction of US clients to its specialist fund strategies.

Although Polar Capital is taking steps to increase diversification of its investment strategies, I believe the reduction of the Global Technology Fund concentration risk will take time.

Polar Capital is also heavily reliant on the investment expertise of fund managers, Rogoff and Evans, who have created a strong reputation for themselves. Unlike the notorious demise of their peer, Neil Woodford, these two managers could decide to leave Polar Capital and launch their own fund.

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Teresa Kersten, an employee of LinkedIn, a Microsoft subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Nadia Yaqub has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Polar Capital Holdings. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Stack of one pound coins falling over
Investing Articles

Want to turn your ISA into a passive income machine? These 3 steps help

Christopher Ruane looks at a trio of factors he reckons could help an investor as they aim to earn passive…

Read more »

Investing For Beginners

2 FTSE shares that have been oversold in this stock market correction

Jon Smith reviews the recent market slump and points out a couple of FTSE shares he believes have been oversold…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

As the stock market moves down, I’m taking the Warren Buffett approach!

Rather than getting nervous as markets move around, our writer is looking to the career of Warren Buffett to see…

Read more »

Fans of Warren Buffett taking his photo
Investing Articles

Here’s how a stock market crash could be brilliant news for your retirement!

This writer isn't peering into a crystal ball trying to time the next stock market crash. Instead, he's making an…

Read more »

Burst your bubble thumbtack and balloon background
Investing Articles

Down 93%, should I load up on this penny stock while it’s under 1p?

The small-cap company behind this penny stock is eyeing up a substantial global market opportunity. So why did it crash…

Read more »

Portrait of pensive bearded senior looking on screen of laptop sitting at table with coffee cup.
Investing Articles

Is Fundsmith Equity still worth holding in a Stocks and Shares ISA or SIPP in 2026?

The performance of the Fundsmith Equity fund has been shocking over the last two years. Is it still smart to…

Read more »

Young female hand showing five fingers.
Investing Articles

5 smart moves to make before the 2025/2026 ISA deadline

Taking advantage of the annual allowance isn’t the only smart move to make before the upcoming ISA deadline, says Edward…

Read more »

Businesswoman calculating finances in an office
Investing Articles

Here’s the dividend forecast for Lloyds shares through to 2028

Can dividend forecasts tell investors much about the outlook for banking shares? Stephen Wright sets out what investors really need…

Read more »