Neil Woodford, Wm. Morrison Supermarkets plc And How Investors Are Being Mislead

You can’t trust lists of major shareholders in company annual reports, as the case of Wm. Morrison Supermarkets plc (LON:MRW) demonstrates.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

So, you’ve read a company’s annual report and are delighted to see your favourite fund manager, or management house, listed as a major shareholder. Hold your horses! All may not be as it seems.

The current disclosure rules, in practice, far from increasing transparency, are misleading unwary investors.

At the extremes, a fund manager listed with a 4.99% shareholding in a company’s annual report may, in fact, hold no shares at all — while, conversely, a manager not listed as a major shareholder may actually have a stake of up to 4.99%. And no-one — aside from the management house — is any the wiser.

Disclosure rules

To explain the anomaly, I’ll have to leave out the complexities and technical language of the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules (DTR) of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Essentially, a person must notify a company (and the company must notify the market) if the person’s interest in the company reaches 3%, and as certain thresholds above that level are reached. In the case of investment managers, such as Invesco Perpetual, the starting threshold for notifying the company is 5%.

The mischief arises when a management group with a notifiable holding reduces its stake back below the 5% disclosable level.

I’m going to give you a concrete example of how a below-5% notification can make a mockery of the list of major shareholders in a company’s annual report by looking at the recently published report of Wm. Morrison Supermarkets (LSE: MRW).

Morrisons’ major shareholders

For a number of years, Invesco Perpetual had an above-5% holding in Morrisons of about 133 million shares. The vast majority were held in star manager Neil Woodford‘s Income and High Income funds.

Last October it was announced that Woodford would be leaving Invesco this spring, and ‘transitioning’ the funds to new manager Mark Barnett. In November came a disclosure that Invesco’s holding in Morrisons had fallen by 22 million shares to 111 million (4.75%).

morrisonsInvesco could have simply stated that its holding had gone below 5%, without detailing the new level. However, because the shareholding was given, Invesco appeared as the fifth-largest of eight major shareholders in Morrisons’ annual report (p. 73) as at 12 March 2014.

Now, because Invesco’s holding had gone below 5% in November, any further trades (aside from back above 5%), were not required to be notified under the rules. At the time I explained to Motley Fool readers that Woodford’s successor, Barnett, wasn’t a fan of Morrisons, and that I wouldn’t be surprised if Woodford got shot of the supermarket from the funds.

I’ve just dug down into the recently published annual report of the High Income fund, and found that Woodford ditched all 68 million shares between June and December. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’d also sold the 53 million shares that were held by the Income fund at the end of September, but I can’t be sure of that, because the latest report of the Income fund has yet to be published.

In theory, far from being a top shareholder, with a stake of a little below 5%, per Morrisons’ annual report, Invesco could hold no shares at all. My best guess, though, is that the holding is somewhere around the 1% mark, because one fund manager at Invesco — Ciaran Mallon — has been keen on the company.

The position of Invesco in Morrisons’ annual report can be contrasted with that of another fund manager, BlackRock, whose shareholding in the supermarket also went below 5% at the backend of last year.

In contrast to Invesco, BlackRock simply notified its stake had passed below the disclosable threshold, without revealing any further details. As such, BlackRock doesn’t appear on the list of major shareholders in Morrisons’ annual report. In reality, it’s perfectly possible that BlackRock could hold a 4.99% stake, and thus be one of the supermarket’s top four shareholders.

So, there you have it: don’t put too much store in the lists of major shareholders in company annual reports!

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

G A Chester does not own any shares mentioned in this article.

More on Investing Articles

Person holding magnifying glass over important document, reading the small print
Investing Articles

3 UK stocks I reckon could benefit from the upcoming general election

As the general election hurtles towards us, this Fool wonders which UK stocks could benefit, and focuses on three picks…

Read more »

BUY AND HOLD spelled in letters on top of a pile of books. Alongside is a piggy bank in glasses. Buy and hold is a popular long term stock and shares strategy.
Investing Articles

At 11%, this dividend share pays the biggest yield in the FTSE 100

When a dividend share offers a big yield, we need to be cautious of the risks. But I reckon this…

Read more »

British Isles on nautical map
Investing Articles

I reckon Hiscox shares could be one of the best bargains on the FTSE

I've been investing in FTSE companies for years, but after a major decline I've not seen a company with as…

Read more »

Grey Number 4 Stencil on Yellow Concrete Wall
Investing Articles

4 reasons I’d still buy National Grid shares in a heartbeat despite the recent wobble!

As National Grid shares plunged on the news of a right issue, I’m not flinching, and reckon it's a top…

Read more »

Three signposts pointing in different directions, with 'Buy' 'Sell' and 'Hold' on
Investing Articles

After gaining 45% in 12 months, is the Amazon share price now overvalued?

Our author thinks the Amazon share price might be too high. While the long-term future of the business looks bright,…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 hot dividend stocks I’d buy and hold for 10 years

Our writer reckons these two dividend stocks could help her bag juicy dividends for years to come and explains why.

Read more »

British Pennies on a Pound Note
Investing Articles

2 dividend-paying penny shares I’d happily own

These two penny shares have caught our writer's eye for a combination of income prospects now and business growth potential…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

This FTSE 250 share looks like a bargain to me!

This FTSE 250 share has seen its price tumble due to chaotic local economic conditions in a key market. But…

Read more »