3 Hazardous Reasons To Steer Clear Of AstraZeneca plc

Royston Wild looks at why AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN) is an exceptionally risky stock selection.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

shire

Today I am looking at why I believe AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) is on course to endure lasting earnings weakness.

Patent problems continue to pummel revenues

AstraZeneca has taken an age to satisfactorily address the problem of patent expiration across many of its critical products, a crushing millstone on group turnover. Indeed, the drugs giant announced earlier this month that the loss of exclusivity on previous earnings drivers — which includes the likes of Seroquel IR, Atacand, Nexium and Merrem — drove revenues 8% lower during 2013 to $25.7bn. This in turn pushed operating profit 54% lower to $3.7bn.

The prospect of further patent troubles has prompted AstraZeneca to warn that it expects “a low-to-mid single digit percentage decline in revenue at constant exchange rates for 2014,” a result which is likely to cause core earnings per share “to decline in the teens.”

Paltry pipeline unlikely to offer near-term respite

AstraZeneca continues to chuck vast amounts of capital into its R&D operations in order to rectify its ailing revenues, and spent $1.43bn on new product development last year, up 8.3% from 2012.

The company is also hoovering up pharma companies across the globe to offset shortfalls in its organic product development. AstraZeneca bought out Bristol-Myers Squibb’s stake in their diabetes-combating joint venture just this month, while other major purchases over the past year include respiratory specialists Pearl Therapeutics and lipids experts Omthera Pharmaceuticals.

Although such measures have helped to boost the pipeline — 11 products entered Phase III trialling last year versus just six in 2012 — the route from laboratory to store shelf is of course a bumpy one which can take many years to complete. Indeed, chief executive Pascal Soriot warned that revenues will only recover to last year’s levels by 2017 as the exclusivity saga rumbles on.

A relatively expensive valuation

Still, investors have been unperturbed by these concerns, and AstraZeneca’s share price has shot almost 15% higher since the middle of January. But in my opinion this leaves the firm at the mercy of a severe price correction, particularly considering the superior strength of its pharmaceutical rivals.

Indeed, AstraZeneca now deals on a P/E rating of 15.6 for 2014, an expensive choice when compared against GlaxoSmithKline which currently trades on a multiple of 15.1 and has a much more bubbly product pipeline and consequently superior earnings prospects.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

> Royston does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

UK shares: a once-in-a-decade chance to bag sky-high passive income

The FTSE 250 is offering up incredible passive income opportunities right now. Our writer takes a look at one stock…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 dirt cheap FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 growth shares to consider!

Looking for great growth and value shares right now? These FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 shares could offer the best…

Read more »

Investing Articles

No savings? I’d use the Warren Buffett method to target big passive income

This Fool looks at a couple of key elements of Warren Buffett's investing philosophy that he thinks can help him…

Read more »

Investing Articles

This FTSE 100 hidden gem is quietly taking things to the next level

After making it to the FTSE 100 index last year, Howden Joinery Group looks to be setting its sights on…

Read more »

Investing Articles

A £20k Stocks and Shares ISA put into a FTSE 250 tracker 10 years ago could be worth this much now

The idea of a Stocks and Shares ISA can scare a lot of people away. But here's a way to…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

What next for the Lloyds share price, after a 25% climb in 2024?

First-half results didn't do much to help the Lloyds Bank share price. What might the rest of the year and…

Read more »

Investing Articles

I’ve got my eye on this FTSE 250 company

The FTSE 250's full of opportunities for investors willing to do the search legwork, and I think I've found one…

Read more »

Investing Articles

This FTSE 250 stock has smashed Nvidia shares in 2024. Is it still worth me buying?

Flying under most investors' radars, this FTSE 250 stock has even outperformed the US chip maker year-to-date. Where will its…

Read more »