Why I Hate AstraZeneca plc

Aside from its 5.6% yield, Harvey Jones finds little to love about AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN).

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

There is something to love and hate in almost every stock, but sometimes the hate outweighs the love. Today, that’s the case with AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US). Here are five reasons why.

Where did the growth go? 

If you had invested in AstraZeneca three years ago, you would now be sitting on a loss of nearly 5%. In that time, the FTSE 100 rose 15% and pharmaceutical rival GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) was up a healthy 22%. That’s serious underperformance by AZN. The slide has continued with a 6% fall in the past six months, against a 5% rise on the FTSE 100. Reversing this will take time.

Too much bad news

Most companies like to bury the bad news in their results. AstraZeneca doesn’t have that luxury. Its recent results headlined a 4% drop in Q2 revenue to $6.23 billion, largely due to loss of exclusivity on several key brands, which wiped out around $500 billion of revenue. Core operating profit was down 10% to $2.06 billion, while core earnings per share (EPS) fell 21% to $1.20. Pricing pressure in Europe hasn’t helped, either. You can praise management for its honesty, if little else.

It’s a long road to recovery

Pascal Soriot, chief executive officer, has put on a brave face, claiming “real progress” against AZN’s strategic priorities, with its investment in distinctive science, pipeline projects and key markets delivering double-digit revenue growth. Bringing new prescription drugs to market is a precarious business, with many a slip between pipeline and profit. As a pure pharmaceuticals group, without the diversification that Glaxo’s consumer healthcare division gives it, AstraZeneca has to get this right.

This stock is all yield

One of the benefits of a falling share price is a rising yield, so you won’t be surprised to see that AstraZeneca now yields a highly likeable 5.6%, against Glaxo’s 4.7%. But what I don’t like is that the first interim dividend was exactly the same as last year. No progression there. Management also decided there would be no share repurchases this year, claiming it can put the money to better use by investing in the business. Let’s hope so.

Growth still looks scarce

AstraZeneca is on a forecast 21% drop in earnings per share (EPS) this calendar year. 2014 should see a smaller fall of 6%, but that’s still a fall. Throw in a 12% drop in 2012, and EPS look set to fall across three consecutive years. The result is that you can buy AZN at just 7.8 times earnings, almost half Glaxo’s valuation of 14 times earnings. AstraZeneca may suit patient contrarians, but these embarrassing figures show just how far it has fallen behind its big rival in recent years.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

> Harvey owns shares in GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

 
 

More on Investing Articles

Abstract 3d arrows with rocket
Investing Articles

2 FTSE 250 growth stocks I think could explode in 2025!

These FTSE 250 shares have grown strongly in value this year. And our writer Royston Wild doesn't think they're done…

Read more »

Hand of person putting wood cube block with word VALUE on wooden table
Investing Articles

This FTSE 250 stock looks great value on a P/E ratio of 8.8

This FTSE 250 industrial company’s been generating big returns for investors lately. But its shares still look very cheap today.

Read more »

Silhouette of a bull standing on top of a landscape with the sun setting behind it
Investing Articles

This bargain growth stock could be ready for a bull run

Our writer reckons this FTSE 100 growth stock has the potential to deliver stunning returns, but its investors need a…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£25k in savings? Here’s how I’d try and turn that into passive income worth £12k a year

By investing in UK and US shares at knockdown prices I hope to generate a five-figure passive income stream before…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Down 88%, this volatile FTSE 250 stock could be the bargain of the decade!

Dr James Fox believes this FTSE 250 stock could be vastly overlooked, and brokerages agree with him. The average target…

Read more »

Senior woman potting plant in garden at home
Top Stocks

4 robotics stocks Fools think could deliver explosive growth

These stocks are appealing for their growth potential, given the increasing adoption of robotics across various industries.

Read more »

A senior group of friends enjoying rowing on the River Derwent
Investing Articles

How much do I need to invest in UK shares to retire on the passive income they earn?

Investing in a diversified portfolio of dividend stocks can generate a nice passive income to help long-term investors to retire…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Forget the next 5 years, I think these UK dividend shares can last forever

Not much lasts forever. But Stephen Wright thinks some UK firms have advantages that mean their shares can be good…

Read more »