One of the big stories in the world of investment over the past 20 years or so has been the rise of property prices. Many buy-to-let investors have done very well but there are headwinds in the sector now that didn’t exist before.
I’d shun buy-to-let property today and invest in FTSE 100 shares instead for the following three reasons.
Getting in and out of property can be difficult. It’s one thing to decide to sell your buy-to-let investment but quite another thing to do it. First, you must find someone willing to buy the property and then proceed through a long and often complicated process to execute the deal. Sometimes, if the market conditions are poor, you may be unable to sell and could end up trapped in an investment you’d rather be shot of.
Equally, finding and buying a buy-to-let property in the first place can be fraught with frustration and difficulty. In that sense, property is illiquid, which contrasts with owning shares of firms listed in the FTSE 100 index. Buying and selling shares with big market capitalisations is usually as simple as making a number of clicks of your computer mouse.
Compared to the average wage, residential property is less affordable now than it was 20 years ago. As such, the valuation of property is running at heady levels and has been fuelled by factors such as low general interest rates and the government’s help-to-buy schemes. I reckon there’s a real risk of property prices reverting to more affordable levels, especially if and when interest rates finally rise again.
But that situation contrasts with the valuations of many FTSE 100 companies, which on some measures look cheap. The dividend yield of the FTSE 100 overall is running close to 4.5%, which strikes me like a decent return for shareholders.
Buying, selling, and owning buy-to-let property is a process loaded with costs from professional fees through to maintenance and other ongoing expenses. But buying and holding FTSE 100 shares involves smaller costs such as dealing fees around £10 or less when you buy and when you sell, stamp duty at 0.5% when buying, and a small amount of loss because of the spread between the bid and offer prices. There’s also often a running fee for holding the shares in a share account.
However, the costs of shares are often much lower than the costs of property. But both classes of asset are capable of delivering similar benefits. For example, the value of both can fluctuate with the potential to rise over time. Both are capable of delivering a yield to their owners – with property, it’s the rent and with shares, it’s the dividend.
On top of that, given all the time and hassle involved with property ownership, I’ll take FTSE 100 shares any day!
According to one leading industry firm, the 5G boom could create a global industry worth US $12.3 TRILLION out of thin air…
And if you click here, we’ll show you something that could be key to unlocking 5G’s full potential...
It’s just ONE innovation from a little-known US company that has quietly spent years preparing for this exact moment…
But you need to get in before the crowd catches onto this ‘sleeping giant’.
Kevin Godbold has no position in any share mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.