£5,000 invested in Lloyds shares 10 years ago is now worth…

Anyone who’s owned Lloyds shares for the last decade may wish to stop reading right now as returns have been very disappointing.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

Young Asian woman with head in hands at her desk

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Lloyds‘ (LSE: LLOY) shares remain a popular investment. It seems that investors are drawn to the low share price, dividend income, and the fact that the stock remains miles off its highs.

The shares haven’t been a good long-term investment though. Had an investor put £5,000 into them a decade ago, they’d probably be pretty disappointed today…

The share price hasn’t gone up!

On 26 January 2015, Lloyds shares closed the day at 76p. So let’s say the investor picked up £5k worth of shares at that price. Ignoring trading commissions, they’d have got 6,578 shares.

Now, on Friday (24 January), Lloyds’ share price ended the day at 61.8p. That’s 18.7% lower than the price 10 years ago. This means those 6,578 shares would now be worth £4,065.

That translates to a loss of roughly £935. Ouch!

Dividends change things

This doesn’t tell the full story though. Because Lloyds has paid dividends for a large part of the decade. I crunched the numbers and found that over the 10-year period, Lloyds paid out a total of 22.7p in dividends. Therefore, with 6,578 shares, the investor would have picked up income of around £1,493.

So including dividend income, the investor would have made a profit. Overall, their £5,000 would have grown to £5,558 – an 11% gain.

That’s better than a loss, obviously. But it isn’t a good return over a decade. Especially when you consider inflation over this period. At one stage during that period, inflation was running at over 10%.

The cost of holding on to Lloyds

It’s also really disappointing when you consider the returns from some other investments. Had the investor put £5,000 into London Stock Exchange Group shares (one of my favourite UK shares), that money would now be worth over £25,000. Had they put £5,000 into Apple shares (which are listed in the US), that money would now be worth over £47,000.

Even if they had simply lumped the money in a global tracker fund, they’d now have nearly £15,000. So the ‘opportunity cost’ of holding on to Lloyds shares for the long term has been huge.

I’ll be buying other shares

Now, investing’s a forward-looking pursuit, of course. And looking ahead, Lloyds shares could perform better over the next 10 years than they have over the last.

Today, the shares offer an attractive dividend yield of about 5.3%. That alone could generate solid returns (although dividends are never guaranteed and Lloyds has cut its dividend in the past).

The stock’s poor long-term track record spooks me however. So does the outlook for the bank, given the weak UK economy and the huge amount of disruption in banking today.

So I won’t be buying them any time soon. I think there are much better stocks to snap up for my portfolio today.

Edward Sheldon has positions in Apple and London Stock Exchange Group Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Apple and Lloyds Banking Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Value Shares

Young Caucasian man making doubtful face at camera
Investing Articles

Time to start preparing for a stock market crash?

2025's been an uneven year on stock markets. This writer is not trying to time the next stock market crash…

Read more »

Close-up image depicting a woman in her 70s taking British bank notes from her colourful leather wallet.
Investing Articles

Move over Lloyds, are Barclays shares the ones to go for in 2026?

As we head into 2026 with inflation and interest rates set to fall, what does the banking outlook offer for…

Read more »

A pastel colored growing graph with rising rocket.
Investing Articles

Will a Bank of England interest rate cut light a rocket under this forgotten UK income stock?

Harvey Jones says this FTSE 100 income stock could get a real boost once the next interest rate cut lands.…

Read more »

A senior man using hiking poles, on a hike on a coastal path along the coastline of Cornwall. He is looking away from the camera at the view.
Investing Articles

Is Diageo quietly turning into a top dividend share like British American Tobacco?

Smoking may be dying out but British American Tobacco remains a top dividend share. Harvey Jones wonders if ailing spirits…

Read more »

Snowing on Jubilee Gardens in London at dusk
Investing Articles

Is it time to consider gobbling up these 3 FTSE 100 Christmas turkeys?

Our writer looks at the pros and cons of buying three of the FTSE 100’s (INDEXFTSE:UKX) worst performers over the…

Read more »

Finger clicking a button marked 'Buy' on a keyboard
Investing Articles

The best time to buy stocks is when they’re cheap. Here’s 1 from my list

Buying discounted stocks can be a great way to build wealth and earn passive income. But investors need to be…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Looking for shares to buy as precious metals surge? 3 things to remember!

Gold prices have been on a tear. So has silver. So why isn't this writer hunting for shares to buy…

Read more »

British Pennies on a Pound Note
Investing Articles

Up 27% in 2025, might this penny share still be a long-term bargain?

Christopher Ruane's happy that this penny share he owns has done well in 2025. But it's still cheaper now than…

Read more »