FTSE 250: More Growth And Less Risk Than The FTSE 100

Here’s why the FTSE 250 (INDEXFTSE:MCX) could be a better buy than the FTSE 100 (INDEXFTSE:UKX).

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

For most investors, their investment world revolves around the FTSE 100. That’s understandable since it’s made up of the 100 largest companies listed in the UK and is the place where most investors have their funds tied up for the long term. And with it offering a highly favourable risk/reward ratio, it’s an excellent place to invest for the long term.

That is, until you consider investing in the FTSE 250. It’s often viewed as being a riskier place to invest than the FTSE 100 and while this may be true in the sense that it’s made up of smaller companies, in recent months it has fallen by a lot less than its larger peer.

For example, since the FTSE 100 hit its all-time high of 7,103 points on 27 April 2015, it has fallen by 18.8%. Clearly, that’s a hugely disappointing performance and while we’re not technically in a bear market (although for one day the FTSE 100 did slip into bear market territory having been 20% down from its high), it’s very much on the near-term horizon.

With the FTSE 250 apparently offering greater risk than the FTSE 100, many investors may think that it will have fallen by much more than the FTSE 100 during the same time period. However, the FTSE 250 is down by 11.3% since 27 April 2015 and this indicates less, rather than more, risk.

Faster recovery

Even during the credit crunch when the FTSE 100 fell by 47% from its 2007 high to its 2009 low, the FTSE 250 declined by only marginally more than its larger peer. During the same time period the FTSE 250 dropped by 50% and while that’s a worse performance than the FTSE 100, the mid-cap index recovered much, much quicker. In fact, since those March 2009 lows, the FTSE 250 has risen by 160% versus an increase of 50% in the level of the FTSE 100.

Clearly, the FTSE 100’s recent performance has been hurt by the horrific performance of the resources sector to a much greater extent than the FTSE 250. That’s because resources companies make up a much greater proportion of the FTSE 100 than the FTSE 250 and looking ahead, will continue to have a bigger impact on the larger index. As such, a comeback for commodity prices could lead to an outperformance of the FTSE 250 by the FTSE 100.

However in the long run, the FTSE 250 seems likely to beat its larger peer. Although its constituents are smaller and arguably less stable, as well as being less dominant businesses in their respective fields, history tells us that they also offer higher rates of growth than larger companies.

In fact, since the turn of the century the FTSE 100 is down 17% while the FTSE 250 is up 149%. For investors with long-term time horizons therefore, the latter seems to be the better buy. In other words, the FTSE 250 offers the potential for higher rewards that appear to outweigh the prospect of higher risks which, as has been the case in recent months, sometimes fail to materialise.

Peter Stephens has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Two white male workmen working on site at an oil rig
Investing Articles

As oil prices soar, is it time to buy Shell shares?

Christopher Ruane weighs some pros and cons of adding Shell shares to his ISA -- and explains why the oil…

Read more »

Man hanging in the balance over a log at seaside in Scotland
Investing Articles

How much do you need in an ISA for £6,751 passive income a year in 2046?

Let's say an investor wanted a passive income in 20 years' time. How much cash would need be built up…

Read more »

Smiling black woman showing e-ticket on smartphone to white male attendant at airport
Investing Articles

Why isn’t the IAG share price crashing?

Harvey Jones expected the IAG share price to take an absolute beating during current Middle East hostilities. So why is…

Read more »

piggy bank, searching with binoculars
Growth Shares

1 UK share I’d consider buying and 1 I’d run away from on this market dip

In light of the recent stock market dip, Jon Smith outlines the various potential outcomes for a couple of different…

Read more »

Burst your bubble thumbtack and balloon background
Investing Articles

AI may look like a bubble. But what about Rolls-Royce shares?

Bubble talk has been centred on some AI stocks lately. But Christopher Ruane sees risks to Rolls-Royce shares in the…

Read more »

Black woman using smartphone at home, watching stock charts.
Investing Articles

Will the BAE Systems share price soar 13% by this time next year?

BAE Systems' share price continues to surge as the Middle East crisis worsens. Royston Wild asks if the FTSE 100…

Read more »

Portrait of pensive bearded senior looking on screen of laptop sitting at table with coffee cup.
Investing Articles

Is this a once-in-a-decade chance to bag a 9.9% yield from Taylor Wimpey shares?

Taylor Wimpey shares have been hit by a volatile share price and cuts to the dividend. Harvey Jones holds the…

Read more »

Chalkboard representation of risk versus reward on a pair of scales
Investing Articles

Way up – or way down? This FTSE 250 share could go either way

Can this FTSE 250 share turn its fortunes around? Or has its day passed? Our writer looks at both sides…

Read more »