Its reputation and rating won’t be restored quickly.
This week is crunch time at Standard Chartered (LSE: STAN). Since being threatened with the loss of its New York banking licence last Tuesday, its shares initially dropped 25% and have since recovered 10%.
The outcome of Wednesday's meeting with the New York regulator might see that partial recovery evaporate, or else Standard Chartered's premium rating return. Or neither.
DFS regulator Benjamin Lawsky's 27-page dossier reads more like a Batman comic than a legal document. Standard Chartered is a "rogue institution" that "engaged in deceptive and fraudulent misconduct" to move $250 billion through its New York branch for Iranians clients leaving "the US financial system vulnerable to terrorists, weapons dealers, drug kingpins and corrupt regimes". Mr Lawsky's team of Caped Crusaders trawled through 30,000 pages of documents to unearth this evil.
There's a good deal of politicking behind this hyperbole, of course. You can take your pick as to whether it's US versus UK, state regulator versus federal, Democrat versus Republican, or just plain grandstanding.
Where there's smoke...
But the bluster of the ready-made sound bites occludes some really hard questions for Standard Chartered.
The bank has come out fighting. It claims that over 99.9% of transactions complied with regulations and less than $14 million worth were at fault. It says the state regulator is wrong about the law, and wants to negotiate a settlement together with the federal regulators. Five banks including Barclays (LSE: BARC) and Lloyds (LSE: LLOY) have already settled fines totalling $1.8 billion in relation to sanctions violations.
Standard Chartered has also taken legal advice on whether it can sue for damage to its reputation.
At the heart of the allegations are the so-called 'U-turn' regulations, which allowed dollars from Iran's oil industry to be cleared through the US provided they were routed via non-Iranian bank. The crux is whether banks could legitimately strip client details from these transfers before sending them to the US.
Mr Lawson's document makes clear that Standard Chartered knew it was on thin ice. RBS (LSE: RBS) shareholders might be a little miffed at a 1995 memo from Standard Chartered's internal lawyer recommending that it "should use e.g. [National Westminster Bank] who in processing the transaction would breach OFAC regulations and would expose themselves to a penalty". It was certainly aware of the reputational risk, too.
The worst-case scenario is that the bank loses its New York licence. That would have a devastating impact on its business processing, its reputation and its share price.
Mutually assured destruction
But the bank won't take such a big hit without a big fight. It might have grounds for legal action. And it has powerful friends, not just in the West but throughout the developing world. By jumping the gun ahead of federal regulators, Mr Lawsky has possibly made himself vulnerable.
What happens when two sides both have a nuclear option? Of course, the threat of using it is enough to ensure negotiation of a peaceful settlement.
So I believe Standard Chartered's licence is safe. But the outcome will cost it dear, allowing Mr Lawsky his victory. It will be hit three ways:
- A substantial fine, maybe $0.5bn to $1bn.
- Management resignations. The regulator might call for the scalp of finance director Richard Meddings, who is indirectly named in the document, but the chairman and chief executive could also be vulnerable.
- A trashed reputation. Management's hubris over the travails of other banks has turned to nemesis.
What does that mean for the share price? Retaining the New York licence should protect investors from any catastrophic downside. But there is unlikely to be much of a bounce-back. Standard Chartered's premium rating has slipped permanently as the bank has lost its reputation for walking on water. I suspect current levels are the new reality.
As yet another bank disgraces itself, you might think they are all best avoided. One canny investor who read the runes correctly and sold out of the sector ahead of the financial crash was Invesco Perpetual's Neil Woodford. To learn more of his approach and find out where he is investing today you can download this free Motley fool report “8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor". It's free and will be delivered straight to your inbox.
Oils, Pharmaceuticals, Banks, Telecoms -- just where should you invest today? "Top Sectors Of 2012" is the Motley Fool's latest guide to help Britain invest. Better. The report is free.
More Investment Opportunities
> Tony owns shares in Standard Chartered but no other shares mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares in Standard Chartered.