The UK's Most Motivated Marketers

Published in Company Comment on 30 March 2012

This FTSE 250 company doesn't even advertise, yet it's grown swiftly to be worth £500m.

Telecom Plus (LSE: TEP) is surely one of the oddest companies to be included in the mid-cap FTSE 250 index.

Where are the workers?

Telecom Plus certainly has an offbeat business plan. It has no public outlets and doesn't even advertise, relying instead on word-of-mouth recommendations by existing customers. Also, it has a tiny workforce for a company with a market value approaching half a billion pounds. So, how has Telecom Plus become such a stand-out success?

The simple answer is that the firm grew strongly by relying on a huge army of self-employed distributors who sing its praises while signing up new customers to its multi-utility tariffs. In effect, Telecom Plus is a network-marketing business offering landline, mobile phone, broadband, gas and electricity services across the UK.

Telecom Plus is best known for its Utility Warehouse brand, which competes aggressively for communications and energy customers. It also owns a subsidiary that markets fixed-line telephony and broadband to small- and medium-sized businesses via a network of resellers and dealers. In addition, it holds 20% of Opus Energy Group, an independent supplier of gas and electricity to businesses of all sizes.

One benefit for Utility Warehouse customers is less paperwork, because they receive a single monthly bill itemising all of their telecoms and energy spending. In my 10 years of financial journalism, I've come across Utility Warehouse many times, and it's clear to me that its customers and distributors love the competitive deals they get from the firm.

Market-beating marketing

Last weekend, Telecom Plus held its yearly sales conference. Incredibly, 6,000 of its distributors turned up to learn more about making money from network marketing, up 10% on 2011. Now that's what I call a motivated workforce! What's more, thanks to rising unemployment and reduced job security, this distributor base will surely keep growing.

This morning, Telecom Plus unveiled a trading statement for its financial year ending 31 March. It reported a "strong fourth quarter [and] results in line with recently upgraded market expectations". It also confirmed that half of new customers now take at least four of its services in their bundles. This should increase revenue per customer, as well as lowering the group's churn rate.

In a show of confidence, Telecom Plus also announced a final dividend of 17p per share. Added to the interim dividend of 10p, this gives a full-year payout of 27p, which is a tidy 23% ahead of 2010/11's 22p.

Furthermore, cash flow was better than previously predicted, so Telecom Plus should end the year "with a small positive cash balance".

A share in this success

Andrew Lindsay, chief executive of Telecom Plus, said today: "We are pleased with the continuing positive momentum being demonstrated by the business, with strong underlying growth in distributor, customer and service numbers."

Lindsay added: "We believe that the improving quality of our customer base, which has been achieved through our sustained focus on delivering both consistently good value and exceptional levels of customer service, places us in a strong position to deliver significant shareholder value over the months and years ahead."

These are fine words from the man who joined the firm five years ago under executive chairman Charles Wigoder (who himself joined Telecom Plus in February 1998 and helped float it on the London Stock Exchange in July 1999 at 30p a share). What's more, Lindsay is obviously a born competitor: as a British rower, he won a gold medal at the Sydney Olympics in 2000 -- one award that few CEOs can claim to have!

Despite its winning ways, I feel that the Telecom Plus share price has got too far ahead of its commercial success. As I write, its shares trade at 691.5p, up 4p this morning, valuing the group at £485 million. At this price, they trade on a fairly steep price-earnings ratio of 20.8 and offer a dividend yield of 3.9%, covered a mere 1.2 times.

As a value investor, I'm not interested in Telecom Plus, as I'm put off by its high PER, low dividend cover and negligible tangible assets. This is one story that will appeal only to go-go growth investors, and those who hope Telecom Plus will fall to a knockout bid from a bigger rival.

For me, Telecom Plus shares are a sure and solid sell!

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

More from Cliff D'Arcy:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

theRealGrinch 30 Mar 2012 , 1:30pm

a share I brought into in may 2009, but sold out of last year. good business but toppy now

mctickle 30 Mar 2012 , 2:40pm

Interesting article =- a lot of inaccuracies - it was Charles Wigoder that took the comany to market - Lindsay is fairly recent - i am a stareholder and a distributor - if you know Charles Wigoder at all - this company will be in the FTSE 100 in the next decade

lewieboy 31 Mar 2012 , 4:09pm

Oh dear, not sure I would take investment advice from someone who is so sloppy at research.

CunningCliff 02 Apr 2012 , 12:02pm

Apologies, Fools, but something's definitely gone wrong here!

For the record, Charles Wigoder joined Telecom Plus in February 1998 and helped bring it to market the following year. Andrew Lindsay joined the Company in April 2007.

I'll get my article changed right away. Sorry for my mistake.

All the best,

Cliff

CunningCliff 02 Apr 2012 , 12:17pm

By the way, does anyone disagree with me that TEP shares are too toppy? Or do we all agree that a PER of nearly 21 is too high?

Cliff

TMFBoing 02 Apr 2012 , 12:38pm

I've been following TEP for some time now, having considered the shares cheap for a good few years. But I think the undervaluation is pretty much out now, and I can't help feeling that, as with many growth companies, as soon as one set of results isn't quite as sparkling as people hope, there will be a downwards rerating.

I do think it's a great company which is very well managed, but I wouldn't be buying at this level.

Alan
TMFBoing

lewieboy 06 Apr 2012 , 2:01pm

To be fair many so-called experts have been claiming the company was 'fairly priced' for years. And what has happened to the share price in the last 5 years? Up by 350%! Who knows what's going to happen with TEP? If the experts can't predict what chance us mere mortals, lol?

lewieboy 20 Jan 2013 , 6:36pm

Interesting to revisit this article and see what's actually happened in the almost 10 months since publication. Company now worth almost £700 million (up from almost £500 million) and SP up from £7.10 to £9.75! Like I suggested above, 'experts' have been predicting this company's shares have been 'fairly priced' since they were £3 several years ago!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.