HSBC Hits The Heights

Published in Company Comment on 27 February 2012

The global bank unveils strong results, boosted by booming emerging markets.

HSBC Holdings (LSE: HSBA) -- alias "the world's local bank" -- unveiled a rock-solid set of results for 2011 this morning, driven by its strength in fast-growing markets.

Hiding from the hurricane

Other, more UK-focused banks have reported weak results for 2011, hit by the ongoing crisis in the eurozone. However, HSBC's global reach has allowed it to avoid much of this turmoil, as it continues to focus on the booming economies of the Pacific Rim.

Last year, HSBC's profit before tax leapt 15% to $21.9 billion (£13.8 billion), up 15% on 2010. However, this includes $3.9 billion of 'fair value' gains booked against movements in its own debt. Thanks to a bizarre accounting standard known as FAS 157, when a bank's credit rating reduces and the value of its bonds also falls, it can book this reduced liability as a notional gain.

This is because, in theory, the bank can buy back this debt at below par value in the market, thus reducing its future liabilities. Alas, in the real world, such mark-to-market accounting creates 'phantom profits' that are usually reversed as bank bonds approach maturity. Hence, FAS 157 has attracted much criticism, especially from US regulators and politicians.

Anyway, here's where HSBC made its bumper profits (in $billions):

Region20112010Growth
Rest of Asia-Pacific7.55.927%
Hong Kong5.85.72%
Europe4.74.39%
Latin America2.31.829%
Middle East and North Africa1.50.967%
North America0.10.5-78%
Total21.919.015%

As you can see, $7.5 billion -- more than a third of HSBC's total profits -- came from the Asia-Pacific region, followed by $5.8 billion from Hong Kong. Europe's contribution of $4.7 billion relegates it to third place, but still twice as profitable as Latin America ($2.3 billion).

At just 2%, growth in Hong Kong was relatively weak, versus 27% in the Asia-Pacific, 29% in Latin America and a whopping 67% in the MENA region. Alas, HSBC's disastrous foray into North America in the Noughties continues to haunt the group, with profits collapsing by almost four-fifths (78%) to $0.1 billion in 2011.

As well as checking its geographic strength, it's also worth seeing which of HSBC's divisions performed best. Here they are, again in $billions:

Global business20112010Growth
Commercial Banking7.96.130%
Global Banking and Markets7.09.2-24%
Retail Banking and Wealth Management4.33.811%
Other1.7-1.2N/A
Global Private Banking0.91.1-10%
Profit before tax21.919.015%

Commercial Banking -- lending to businesses -- had an excellent 2011, with profits rising 30% to $7.9 billion. Retail Banking and Wealth Management also improved, growing 11% to $4.3 billion. However, in line with its investment-banking rivals, HSBC's Global Banking and Markets had a poor year, with profits slumping 24% to $7 billion in volatile markets.

A bigger, stronger HSBC

As you'd expect from a bank of its size, HSBC bounced back strongly after the global financial crash of 2007/09. In 2011, its return on equity improved to 10.9%, versus 9.5% in 2010, but below its 2013 target of 12% to 15%.

Also, the mega-bank's earnings per share leapt from $0.73 in 2010 to $0.92 in 2011, up more than a quarter (26%). Another positive was the fall in loan impairment charges: $12.1 billion in 2011, down $1.9 billion on 2010.

However, not all the bank's key performance indicators were positive. Its operating expenses leapt by 10% to $41.5 billion, which pushed up its cost-efficiency ratio to 57.5%, against 55.2% in 2010. This was largely driven by higher staff costs in faster-growing markets, plus $1.1 billion of restructuring costs. Even so, the group will have to take an axe to costs to hit its 2013 target of 48% to 52%.

Also, unlike its UK-based peers such as Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) and Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS), HSBC is not shrinking its enormous balance sheet. Indeed, in 2011, the bank's total assets grew by $101 billion (up 4%) to nearly $2.6 trillion.

Disappointingly, HSBC's Core Tier One capital ratio went in the wrong direction in 2011, falling to 10.1% from 10.5% in 2010. Nevertheless, this is in the upper half of the group's target range of 9.5% to 10.5%.

Lastly, HSBC took great pains to emphasise the importance of its shareholders. It boasted that it declared $7.3 billion in dividends in 2011, worth $0.41 per share and 14% ahead of 2010. This compares with $4.3 billion of 'variable pay' (read 'after-tax bonuses') paid to employees. Still, shareholders should push for more of the former and less of the latter!

Buy this banking powerhouse

Thanks to its dominance in fast-growing foreign markets, HSBC shrugged off the global downturn and emerged stronger than its UK and US rivals. Nevertheless, the bank continues to reshape itself, closing 16 businesses in 2011 and a further three so far this year.

Looking ahead, HSBC will continue to transform and grow. Right now, Asia, Latin America and the MENA region account for just short of half (49%) of HSBC's revenues. No doubt these three regions will produce the majority of the bank's revenues going forward.

As I write, HSBC shares trade at 561.3p, down 2.4% in a weak London market. This values the group at £100 billion, making it one of the biggest firms in Europe. At this price, HSBC shares trade on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 9.2 and offer a prospective dividend yield of 4.9%, covered 2.2 times.

There is only one thing to say about these fundamentals: buy this global banking brand today, as it is tough to find such far-reaching strength at such a low price.

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

More from Cliff D'Arcy:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

4spiel 27 Feb 2012 , 2:46pm

I regret not buying more at 480 -it is with thethe very big uncertainties out there questionable whether you should add today or in the near future.If you take a very long view investments that arethe picture might be more positive but yet again there is no certainty in current geopolitics. I am still inclined to rely on undervalued investments less constructed upon debt pyramids that have revenues that are derived from basic needs where you can find them and bearing in mind the recent bull run it is not easy -if this opinion might not be very helpful.

DANordic 27 Feb 2012 , 4:13pm

Good Article!

BigJC1 27 Feb 2012 , 5:05pm

4spiel Isn't banking a basic need, I know few people or businesses who can operate without one ?

equitybore 27 Feb 2012 , 6:08pm

HSBC broadly knows what it is doing, has competitive advantage in key growth markets, pays a good dividend. It is a core holding in my SANE (sleep at night equity) holdings.

4spiel 27 Feb 2012 , 9:40pm

AS said regret not buying more at 480p -but being a lagard will be looking to buy if anywhere on Hong Kong because I believe the $ peg will not be with us for many more years. Yes banks are a kind of need but you can do without them but you cannot do without food power water and medicies !

tux222 28 Feb 2012 , 8:17am

Banking a kind of need? Functionally yes, but why with an existing organisation? Read the other article about mobile phone payments, and ask yourself how long it'll be before an obvious next step takes place. I'm thinking of Vodafone et al becoming retail banks, as Tesco already has.

Now our deposits are guaranteed by the government rather than a bank's reputation, and now banks' reputations are mud rather than gold, it makes a lot of sense for large retailing organisations to cut out the middle-men and raise (some of) their working capital by becoming retail banks.

Agreed, HSBC are god in a mostly bad bunch ... and at present I bank with them. Not keen to buy the equity, though.

tux222 28 Feb 2012 , 8:18am

Sorry that should have been "good", an "o" went walkies!

ForexTrainingGuy 28 Feb 2012 , 12:52pm

Not sure whether a 15% rise compared to horrible 2010 is great but still a solid effort. Kinda makes you have confidence again. Great article.

CunningCliff 28 Feb 2012 , 4:34pm

For the record, HSBC's all-time biggest profit before tax was around £15.1 billion in 2007. Its figure for 2011 was only about 10% below this high.

Thus, compared with its big UK rivals (BARC, LLOY and RBS), HSBC has easily been the strongest bank over the past four years!

Cliff

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.