A Licence To Print Money

Published in Company Comment on 5 August 2009

Stephen Bland casts his eye over another potential value share.

This week this weak pun of the title refers to De La Rue (LSE: DLAR), a share in which I have a stake. Apologies for the obvious and poor titular wordplay because it has probably been done to death by commentators on De La Rue, but I tried to make up for it with the trick homophonic repetition in my first four words.

Here's the usual fundies:

Share price838p
52 week high/low1,074p/802p
Market cap£825m
Eps actual 28/03/0957.0p
Eps forecast 201073.0p
Eps forecast 201176.1p
P/E forecast 201011.5
P/E forecast 201111.0
Dividend actual 28/03/0941.1p
Dividend forecast 201044.6p
Dividend forecast 201147.0p
Yield forecast 20105.3%
Yield forecast 20115.6%
Tangible assets 28/03/09negative
Net debt 28/03/09£33.1m

On the face of it then, not a massive value share for several reasons. Negative tangible assets, a P/E which is not especially low compared with the market and it has net debt though only a very modest amount relative to its capitalisation. The yield though is attractive and forecast to rise.

So what then would attract someone like me, who would rather stick a red hot poker where the sun don't shine than buy a non value share, to De La Rue apart from the decent yield and low debt? Well for a start, good yields that appear sustainable and rising turn me on something rotten these days though that's possibly an age thing because little else does. That's the case even for a short-term value play.

Cashback

Another value signal is the reorganisation which occurred last year when a major division was sold and a cash return of £460m made to shareholders. I've found that such disposals can be an indication of a new drive forward by a business but if I'm right, this has not really been recognised in the share price which is cruising not far off the 52-week low so that's another reason why I think there may be a some mileage here.

De La Rue's business is principally currency printing and other secure products. They have for example won recently the UK passport contract. Not a business in which you'll find too many other quoted shares and it is probably that which makes it interesting, after it has passed some quantitative value tests. Long time readers of my stuff will be aware that I usually have little interest in the actual activities of my plays because value is essentially a numbers game, whatever the business in which the company is engaged. But occasionally a business does actually appeal to me, provided of course it seems cheap and this is one such case, though I would have to agree that it's not being given away.

Limited downside

I think too that the downside may be fairly limited. Not by the numbers particularly because it has no net tangible asset backing, though the decent yield is a bit of a prop. More though because of the apparently bright future. Directorspeak backs this up with the comment in the 2009 results that:

"As indicated in March, De La Rue entered the year with good order book coverage across its businesses which is expected to continue despite the uncertain global economic environment. the Board has confidence in the outlook for the current year"

If that comment turns out accurate, then the shares may be resistant to slipping much, barring a general market fall, and if they do, then they would be even more attractive assuming the fundies remain unchanged. It's the growing eps and general warm glow around the company that provides the downside damage limitation here. Not as good as tangible asset backing of course, nothing much is, but it gets to me.

Dividend income apart, this share smells good and although that part of my investment thinking is not quantifiable or might even seem faintly barmy as a purchase criterion to some, I do think it is priced too cheap and is set for a worthwhile rise in the value player's time frame. Summing up then, I see De La Rue as a nice odour play with a sufficient amount of the more palpable value stuff to make it a buy and this one's a money and mouth job.

More share ideas from Stephen Bland:

Stephen owns shares in De La Rue

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

theRealGrinch 05 Aug 2009 , 3:40pm

interesting. I looked at this in march and thought with gearing approaching 200% it was pretty trashy. nevertheless, the company has some elements in its favour.

simongordon 05 Aug 2009 , 4:51pm

Nice one! Off to dig further. Thank you.

RobinnBanks 06 Aug 2009 , 12:32am

Danny will be pleased!

TechieStock 06 Aug 2009 , 4:54pm

Stephen,

I notice that the cashflow/profit listed for this share is a slightly crazy 0.11 (according to Sharelock). I'm struggling to reconcile this with the disposal you mention. Can this be explained away? Does this not affect other value metrics you've used (I'd think Ent Val, PE and such would be suspect for example)?

~Techie.

pyad 10 Aug 2009 , 5:39pm

Apologies for the overdue response. Because in my previous incarnation we never had the article response feature, I tend to expect any comment on the value board whilst forgetting about this place. The v. board is still my preferred home though and may suit readers too because it will likely have a much greater audience than here, enabling a wider potential for replies.

DLAR gearing is indeed very high if compared with book net assets. In fact it's worse than that on paper because net tangible assets are negative, giving theoretically an infinite and therefore meaningless gearing on that basis. Neither of those figures tell the real story here, which is why I compared net debt with the cap. and that shows a very low and far more informative figure in my view.

You might criticise my gearing observation on the grounds that the cap. could be overstated. Well it could be but it's not here, that can be deduced from the P/E level and high yield.

On the cashflow, the problem as you suggest may be the database, though I haven't checked to see how that particular source does it. But it does happen quite often that databases, because they have to use some standard algorithm to arrive at their ratios, can be thrown by an unusual event to give odd results. Also, straightforward errors are not uncommon in databases.

The upshot is that you always have to check back to the company's accounts to verify the facts and figures of shares selected by database filters. They should be regarded only as a short list for further investigation, not the final choice.

A related problem is that for the same reason, filters could easily miss suitable shares too as well as selecting wrong ones, though that cannot be overcome so easily. You don't know which ones it has missed.

My solution is to filter only very loosely, for example on only one or two of my criteria, not all at once. This gives a longer short list for further research but is less likely to omit a possibly attractive share. DLAR for example, which would have been ignored by a low gearing filter.

So database filters are extremely useful but require care and recognition that they suffer from errors and certain difficulties.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.