Fight your corner: investor taxation has gone too far

It’s not just dividend taxation that takes a bite out of investors’ returns — stamp duty does so, as well.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

British union jack flag and Parliament house at city of Westminster in the background

Image source: Getty Images

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

I’ve written to my local MP precisely once, some years ago.
 
But I’m about to do it again.
 
And the subject that I’m going to write to him about is exactly the same subject as on the previous occasion: shareholder taxation.

Why?  Because an HMRC consultation on stamp duty on shares has just concluded, and HMRC – and doubtless the Treasury – will soon be weighing the various submissions made by interested parties.

In other words, the data-gathering phase has ended.  The political phase is about to begin.  And nervous MPs — there’s a general election next year, don’t forget — will be wanting to let the Chancellor know their views.  Or rather, the views of their constituents.

Dividend taxation: from zero to monstrous, in eight short years

Ordinary investors – people like you and I – might imagine that Conservative governments, and Conservative Chancellors, are somehow ‘on their side’.
 
Not so.
 
It was a Conservative government that introduced dividend taxation, for instance, which took effect from the 2016/2017 tax year.  The tax-free dividend allowance was set at £5,000.  Dividend earnings in excess of that were taxed at 7.5% for basic rate taxpayers, 32.5% for higher-rate (40%) taxpayers, and 38.1% for additional-rate (45%) taxpayers.
 
The following year, the tax-free allowance was cut to £2,000 – and now, from Jeremy Hunt’s first Budget, last autumn, to £1,000.  And then cut again to £500, from next April.  Oh yes, and by the way: 1.25 percentage points have been added to the actual tax rates, so that 7.5% hit for basic taxpayers is now 8.75%, for instance.

Not so long ago, we’d have all paid nothing.
 
And all of this, remember, is double taxation of corporate profits that have already been taxed. It’s just the ownership of those profits that has changed.          

Stamp duty: a tax on investment

So what is this stamp duty consultation all about?
 
Buy shares, and you pay stamp duty – a tax on investment, in short.  You don’t pay it on selling shares, and it’s not a tax on profits – it’s a tax on investing.  On putting money aside for a rainy day, or investing for retirement, in other words.
 
You’re buying those shares inside a tax-sheltered ISA, or a tax-sheltered SIPP?  Tough: you’ll still pay stamp duty.
 
Why are we all paying stamp duty?  It beats me: I don’t know.
 
What does it achieve?  As far as I can see, it simply siphons off some of the money that investors – i.e. voters – are putting aside for retirement, or for a rainy day, and leaves them with less to invest.
 
Which for a government supposedly intent on promoting self-reliance, saving, and investing, is a rather curious way of going about things.

Stamp duty’s perverse incentive mechanism

It gets sillier, as the venerable Association of Investment Companies (AIC) pointed out last week. An activist trade body for REITs and investment trusts, the doughty AIC has a decent track record when it comes to promoting the interests of investors like you and I.
 
And its representations to the HMRC made a telling point, last week.
 
Buy shares in an investment trust, and you’re essentially buying a basket of shares.  The popular City of London Investment Trust, for instance, holds shares in Shell, Unilever, HSBC, Diageo, AstraZeneca, BP, British American Tobacco, and so on.
 
More to the point, buy shares in an investment trust, and you’ll pay stamp duty.
 
But buy that same basket of shares in an ordinary investment fund or mutual fund, putting money aside for a rainy day, or your old age, and you won’t pay that stamp duty.
 
Yet investment funds typically have higher charges, and lack real-time tradeability – features that make them relatively unattractive to investors, like you and I, who care about such things.
 
Despite which, ‘the system’ is geared towards pointing investors to those investment funds, through the stamp duty mechanism.

Time for change

All in all, the tax treatment of investments seems ripe for an overhaul.  Taxing prudent investment – through stamp duty, and the double taxation of company profits through dividend taxation – doesn’t seem fair.
 
As I shall be pointing out to my MP. 
 
Will it make a difference? I’ve no idea. 
 
But in the case of an unpopular government in the run-up to an election – who knows? It might.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Malcolm owns shares in City of London Investment Trust, Shell, Unilever, HSBC, AstraZeneca, and BP. The Motley Fool UK has recommended City Of London Investment Group Plc, HSBC Holdings, and Unilever Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Here’s how I’d invest £200 per month to target a passive income of over £7,100!

Christopher Ruane walks through the mechanics of putting a couple of hundred pounds each month into shares to earn passive…

Read more »

Young Woman Drives Car With Dog in Back Seat
Investing Articles

£9,000 in an ISA? Here’s how I’d aim to turn it into a £10,207 annual second income

Our writer highlights a high-quality ETF that he thinks could help lay a solid foundation for a sizeable future second…

Read more »

Buffett at the BRK AGM
Investing Articles

With a spare £30 a week, I’d use the Warren Buffett approach to building serious passive income!

By learning some lessons from billionaire investor Warren Buffett, this writer aims to build passive income streams using modest regular…

Read more »

Investing Articles

If I’d invested £10k in the FTSE 100 25 years ago, here’s what I’d have today

Has the FTSE 100 been a winner over the last 25 years? Muhammad Cheema takes a look at this and…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

I’d aim for a million buying just 9 or 10 shares

Our writer explains why he believes careful selection of not that many quality blue-chip shares could help him aim for…

Read more »

Portrait of elderly man wearing white denim shirt and glasses looking up with hand on chin. Thoughtful senior entrepreneur, studio shot against grey background.
Investing Articles

£7,000 in savings? Here’s how I’d aim for almost £2,000 a month in passive income

With only a few thousand in savings and £100 to invest a month, our writer considers a strategy to aim…

Read more »

Investing Articles

4 great purebred UK shares that don’t rely on the US economy

UK stocks or American shares? Despite fantastic performance from US markets in recent years, the answer may not be as…

Read more »

Dividend Shares

How I’d build a passive income portfolio with £10k

Building a decent passive income portfolio isn't hard. Here’s how Edward Sheldon would go about doing it with a £10k…

Read more »