The 60/40 portfolio is dead to me. Here’s why!

For me, the traditional 60/40 portfolio split between shares and bonds no longer works. Instead, I prefer to generate passive income from share dividends.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

man in shirt using computer and smiling while working in the office

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

According to conventional investment theory, long-term investors should run a well-diversified 60/40 portfolio. This portfolio is made up of three-fifths (60%) in equities (stocks and shares), with the remaining two-fifths (40%) invested in high-quality bonds. Bonds are IOUs issued by governments or companies that pay fixed interest rates in the form of regular ‘coupons’.

The theory behind the 60/40 portfolio is that it combines the best of both worlds. Most of my money is invested in (riskier) shares for greater long-term growth potential. The remainder is invested in safer bonds for portfolio income, as well as acting as ballast again stock-market declines. Often, when share prices fall, bond prices rise, thus helping to reduce portfolio volatility. But I think the 60/40 split is done with. Here’s why.

Bonds have enjoyed a 40-year bull market

In late 1981, the 10-year US Treasury bond yield peaked at 15.84% a year. That’s right: these ultra-safe securities — backed by the full faith and credit of the US government – paid yearly interest of nearly 16%. This happened after Paul Volcker, former Federal Reserve (the US central bank) chairman had steeply jacked up interest rates to tackle runaway US inflation. However, over the subsequent four decades, interest rates were slashed to today’s near-zero levels. This caused bond prices to soar, pushing down their portfolio yields.

Today, a 10-year T-bond offers a yearly yield of 1.52%. That’s under a tenth (a mere 9.6%) of the income paid 40 years ago from the self-same security. The reason why bond yields are so low and bond prices so high is because most major governments operate near-zero or ZIRP (zero interest-rate policy) programmes. Yet financial advisers still recommend clients stick with the 60/40 portfolio split.

Personally, my big problem with heavy exposure to bonds is that they no longer behave as they once did. Back then, bonds offered a low-risk, low-volatility alternative to stocks and shares. Today, they now come with much higher risk (especially if/when interest rates rise to quench inflation). Also, with bond coupons decimated, their income contribution to portfolio returns has greatly diminished. Thus, bonds dampen portfolio volatility far, far less than they did historically.

My portfolio has 0% bonds

As for my family, we no longer rely on bonds to provide income and stability to my portfolio. For several years, we’ve had zero exposure to bonds of any kind. Instead, our liquid wealth (excluding domestic property) has been near-100% invested in shares. My thinking is: why bother holding low-yielding bonds, only to watch them act as a drag on investment performance? Instead, I prefer to buy stable and rising passive income from high-yielding dividend stocks.

What’s more, I might be 10 years away from retirement, so I’ll continue investing throughout the coming market cycle. And if stock markets do tank, I’ll buy even more cheap shares at lower prices to boost my future returns. However, I do see US stocks — particularly mega-tech firms — as fully priced, frothy and possibly bubbly. Hence, I keep putting my money into cheap UK shares paying generous (but not guaranteed) cash dividends. In short, I’d rather own a share of a well-run business paying a 6%+ yearly dividend than a boring bond paying only 1.5% a year. For me, there may actually be less portfolio risk and volatility by following this high-yield approach!

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Mixed-race female couple enjoying themselves on a walk
Investing Articles

A once-in-a-decade chance to get rich buying growth stocks?

We haven't seen a good spell for growth stocks for quite a few years now. But I reckon the signs…

Read more »

Young Asian man drinking coffee at home and looking at his phone
Investing Articles

The FTSE 100 is full of bargains! Here’s 1 stock I’m eyeing up

A weak economic outlook has hurt the FTSE 100. This Fool explains why she likes the look of this consumer…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 no-brainer beginner FTSE 100 stocks to buy for my portfolio

Getting started with investing can be daunting. Here are two stocks for beginners to consider buying to build their first…

Read more »

Young black man looking at phone while on the London Overground
Investing Articles

2 recession-resistant UK shares investors should consider buying

Our writer details two UK shares she feels could withstand some of the ill-effects of the current malaise to provide…

Read more »

Tanker coming in to dock in calm waters and a clear sunset
Investing Articles

Glencore share price drops on results. Time to buy?

The Glencore share price wobbled a bit after a weak set of 2023 results. Here's why I have the stock…

Read more »

Mature Caucasian woman sat at a table with coffee and laptop while making notes on paper
Investing Articles

Big trouble in China sinks HSBC shares. Should I invest after record FY results?

HSBC shares have slumped following a disappointing end to 2023 for the FTSE stock. Royston Wild explains why this may…

Read more »

View of Tower Bridge in Autumn
Investing Articles

3 dirt cheap FTSE 100 shares to snap up today?

The FTSE 100 is rallying, but many shares still look super cheap on fundamentals. Is our writer buying these three…

Read more »

Black woman using loudspeaker to be heard
Investing Articles

FTSE 100 earnings: what can we expect from Rolls-Royce in 2024?

The Rolls-Royce share price tripled in 2023. Roland Head wonders whether this FTSE 100 stock could continue that impressive trajectory…

Read more »