The 60/40 portfolio is dead to me. Here’s why!

For me, the traditional 60/40 portfolio split between shares and bonds no longer works. Instead, I prefer to generate passive income from share dividends.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

man in shirt using computer and smiling while working in the office

Image source: Getty Images

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

According to conventional investment theory, long-term investors should run a well-diversified 60/40 portfolio. This portfolio is made up of three-fifths (60%) in equities (stocks and shares), with the remaining two-fifths (40%) invested in high-quality bonds. Bonds are IOUs issued by governments or companies that pay fixed interest rates in the form of regular ‘coupons’.

The theory behind the 60/40 portfolio is that it combines the best of both worlds. Most of my money is invested in (riskier) shares for greater long-term growth potential. The remainder is invested in safer bonds for portfolio income, as well as acting as ballast again stock-market declines. Often, when share prices fall, bond prices rise, thus helping to reduce portfolio volatility. But I think the 60/40 split is done with. Here’s why.

Bonds have enjoyed a 40-year bull market

In late 1981, the 10-year US Treasury bond yield peaked at 15.84% a year. That’s right: these ultra-safe securities — backed by the full faith and credit of the US government – paid yearly interest of nearly 16%. This happened after Paul Volcker, former Federal Reserve (the US central bank) chairman had steeply jacked up interest rates to tackle runaway US inflation. However, over the subsequent four decades, interest rates were slashed to today’s near-zero levels. This caused bond prices to soar, pushing down their portfolio yields.

Today, a 10-year T-bond offers a yearly yield of 1.52%. That’s under a tenth (a mere 9.6%) of the income paid 40 years ago from the self-same security. The reason why bond yields are so low and bond prices so high is because most major governments operate near-zero or ZIRP (zero interest-rate policy) programmes. Yet financial advisers still recommend clients stick with the 60/40 portfolio split.

Personally, my big problem with heavy exposure to bonds is that they no longer behave as they once did. Back then, bonds offered a low-risk, low-volatility alternative to stocks and shares. Today, they now come with much higher risk (especially if/when interest rates rise to quench inflation). Also, with bond coupons decimated, their income contribution to portfolio returns has greatly diminished. Thus, bonds dampen portfolio volatility far, far less than they did historically.

My portfolio has 0% bonds

As for my family, we no longer rely on bonds to provide income and stability to my portfolio. For several years, we’ve had zero exposure to bonds of any kind. Instead, our liquid wealth (excluding domestic property) has been near-100% invested in shares. My thinking is: why bother holding low-yielding bonds, only to watch them act as a drag on investment performance? Instead, I prefer to buy stable and rising passive income from high-yielding dividend stocks.

What’s more, I might be 10 years away from retirement, so I’ll continue investing throughout the coming market cycle. And if stock markets do tank, I’ll buy even more cheap shares at lower prices to boost my future returns. However, I do see US stocks — particularly mega-tech firms — as fully priced, frothy and possibly bubbly. Hence, I keep putting my money into cheap UK shares paying generous (but not guaranteed) cash dividends. In short, I’d rather own a share of a well-run business paying a 6%+ yearly dividend than a boring bond paying only 1.5% a year. For me, there may actually be less portfolio risk and volatility by following this high-yield approach!

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Up 75% in 5 years, I reckon this FTSE 250 still has lots to give!

Our writer explains why this FTSE 250 stock could still continue to provide growth and returns despite already being on…

Read more »

Investor looking at stock graph on a tablet with their finger hovering over the Buy button
Investing Articles

2 high-quality FTSE 250 stocks to consider buying

The FTSE 250 is home to some of the best investment opportunities out there. This Fool highlights two stocks for…

Read more »

Investing Articles

The Marks and Spencer share price dips! Is this my chance to buy?

Marks and Spencer was one of the hottest stocks on the market last year. With its share price falling in…

Read more »

Growth Shares

How low could the boohoo share price go?

Jon Smith explains why the enterprise value and the low risk of bankruptcy should help to prevent the boohoo share…

Read more »

Young Asian woman with head in hands at her desk
Investing Articles

Down 23% in a year! Can the Diageo share price regain £30 in 2024?

This Fool UK writer is checking the charts to see if the Diageo share price can recover from the recent…

Read more »

Asian man looking concerned while studying paperwork at his desk in an office
Investing Articles

I wouldn’t touch this FTSE 100 stalwart with a bargepole

Despite looking like a bargain on paper, this Fool is avoiding FTSE 100 constituent Vodafone at all costs. Here he…

Read more »

Investing Articles

I’m waiting for the Rolls-Royce share price to pull back before I buy

The Rolls-Royce share price has been the Footsie's best performer in the last year. But this Fool has no intention…

Read more »

Front view photo of a woman using digital tablet in London
Dividend Shares

2 dividend stocks to take me from £0 to £9.5k in second income

Jon Smith talks through some ideas with second income potential, including one stock that has a dividend yield above 10%…

Read more »