Can you retire on the FTSE 100 with Vanguard’s new offering?

Is Vanguard’s low cost FTSE 100 (INDEXFTSE: UKX) tracker the best way to retire?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

The launch of passive fund manager Vanguard’s new low-cost fund account has rocked the established UK fund management industry.

Vanguard’s new account will cost investors just 0.15% per annum in addition to underlying undergoing fund charges, and account fees will be waived above the first £250,000 invested. This structure means that the maximum account fee payable is just £370 per year, a figure which is significantly lower than the vast majority of other UK fund managers.

For example, Hargreaves Lansdown charges 0.45% as a basic platform fee and other wealth managers can charge as much as 1.5% per annum, excluding any fund management fees. Vanguard’s lowest cost tracker fund charges 0.08% per annum on top of the 0.15% annual fee giving a total cost of 0.23%. Investing in the same fund with Hargreaves would cost 0.53% per annum.

Charges add up

These costs may not seem like much at first glance but over the long term the extra few hundred basis points in fees every year can really add up.

Let’s say you started off with an investment of £1,000 and added £100 every month to your investment pot for five decades. At an annual return of 6% per annum and paying an annual charge of 0.23%, your fund would be worth £349,386 at the end of the observed period. Money lost due to fees would be worth £28,661 over the period. Assuming the same initial and monthly investment as well as 6% annual return with a higher 0.53% annual charge, your pension pot at the end of the period would be worth £315,521 with £62,526 lost to fees and charges.

In the worst-case scenario, where you pay 1.5% per annum in fees, the total lost investment, assuming all the same variables above would be £149,616. The final investment pot would be worth £228,431, a difference of £120,955.

According to various surveys, the average income required by over-50s in retirement to cover the essentials is around £20,000 per annum. On this basis, by making the mistake of paying 1.5% per annum to your wealth manager, you’re essentially spending enough money to fund six years of retirement.

Longer to reach a million

Another way of looking at it is that at a charge of 0.23% per annum, with an initial investment of £1,000 and a monthly contribution of £100, it would take 46 years with an annual investment return of 10% to build a pension pot worth £1m. With an annual fee of 1.5%, it would take 51 years to reach the same level. A 51-year timeframe at an annual charge of 0.23% would give you a pension pot of £1.6m.

These figures speak a thousand words. Vanguard’s new low-cost fund management platform does make achieving the £1m benchmark more realistic for almost everyone.

Remain diversified

While it may be tempting to put all of your cash into a low-cost tracker fund, it’s worth considering the diversification and higher returns offered by investing in some single stocks as well.

Companies such as Royal Dutch Shell, which offers a dividend yield that’s double the market average, and Boohoo.com, which has outperformed the FTSE 100 by 250% over the past 12 months, complement the stability and predictability offered by a tracker.

Nonetheless, even if you do decide to buy these stocks, it’s vital you keep fees to a minimum to reach your maximum wealth creation potential.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Rupert Hargreaves owns shares of Royal Dutch Shell B. The Motley Fool UK has recommended boohoo.com and Royal Dutch Shell B. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Young Caucasian woman with pink her studying from her laptop screen
Investing Articles

These 3 growth stocks still look dirt cheap despite the FTSE hitting all-time highs

Harvey Jones is hunting for growth stocks that have missed out on the recent FTSE 100 rally and still look…

Read more »

Chalkboard representation of risk versus reward on a pair of scales
Investing Articles

Here’s how much I’d need to invest in UK income stocks to retire on £25k a year

Harvey Jones is building his retirement plans on a portfolio of top UK dividend income stocks. There are some great…

Read more »

Investing Articles

If I’d invested £5,000 in BT shares three months ago here’s what I’d have today

Harvey Jones keeps returning to BT shares, wondering whether he finally has the pluck to buy them. The cheaper they…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

Here’s how I’d aim for a million, by investing £150 a week

Our writer outlines how he’d aim for a million in the stock market through regular saving, disciplined investing, and careful…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Here’s how the NatWest dividend could earn me a £1,000 annual passive income!

The NatWest dividend yield is over 5%. So if our writer wanted to earn £1,000 in passive income each year,…

Read more »

Young female hand showing five fingers.
Investing Articles

I’d start buying shares with these 5 questions

Christopher Ruane shares a handful of selection criteria he would use to start buying shares -- or invest for the…

Read more »

Businessman use electronic pen writing rising colorful graph from 2023 to 2024 year of business planning and stock investment growth concept.
Investing Articles

Here’s how much income I’d get if I invested my entire £20k ISA in Tesco shares

Harvey Jones is wondering whether to take the plunge and buy Tesco shares, which offer solid growth prospects and a…

Read more »

Investor looking at stock graph on a tablet with their finger hovering over the Buy button
Investing Articles

1 big-cap stock I’d consider buying with the FTSE 100 around 8,000

With several contenders it’s been a tough choice. But here are my top FTSE 100 stock picks, despite the buoyant…

Read more »