Why fund managers are a waste of money

Become your own fund manager, and build a balanced portfolio adjusted to suit your own attitude to risk.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

For years, nobody questioned the myth of the fund manager. These superhuman stock pickers won “star” status for their semi-mythical ability to thrash the wider market, making grateful investors rich in the process.

Then the myth started to unravel, as research repeatedly showed that three quarters actually underperformed the market.

Soon investors began to wake up to the fact that the only person making money was the manager themselves, through the lavish fees on their funds.

Well beaten

S&P Dow Jones has published new research confirming that instead of beating the market, the vast majority of managers are beaten by it.

What’s fascinating is the sheer scale of long-term underperformance. Incredibly, fund managers are even worse than we thought they were.

For example, in the 2016 calendar year, an astonishing 87% of UK active equity funds failed to beat the benchmark S&P United Kingdom BMI index.

Last year was particularly bad but by no means unusual, with 74% underperforming over a full decade.

World of woe

It gets worse. Over 10 years, 100% of active emerging markets equity funds failed to beat their benchmark, the S&P/IFCI. That’s right, every single one.

I guess that makes 2016 a relatively good year, when “only” 93.62% underperformed.

It is the same story with actively-managed global equity funds, with more than 88% trailing the S&P Global 1200 in the past year, and more than 98% over 10 years.

Some 77% of actively managed US equity funds trailed the S&P 500 in 2016, rising to almost 98% over 10 years.

There is no respite in Europe, where 80% of active funds underperformed last year, and more than 88% over 10 years.

No wonder global fund manager BlackRock has just announced it is replacing most of its human stock pickers with computers.

Fund charges

Asset management companies claim that the very best fund managers can add value, and it is true that a handful do, but in the longer run the majority do not.

The picture is even worse when you consider that fund managers charge a premium for underperformance with initial fees of up to 5% of your money, and annual management charges ranging from 0.75% to 1.75%.

Manage your own money

Instead of paying extra for failure you can build your own low-cost portfolio using exchange traded funds (ETFs) issued by companies such as BlackRock’s iShares, Vanguard, State Street Global Advisors’ SPDR and Invesco PowerShares, which passively track a chosen index.

These have no initial fees and annual charges ranging from 0.07% to 0.15% (plus dealing fees and stamp duty charges).

Better still, become your own fund manager, and build a balanced portfolio of stocks and shares, adjusted to suit your own attitude to risk.

It takes a little time and effort, you have to understand the risks as well as the rewards, but there is one danger you definitely avoid: handing over a fat chunk of your wealth to an overpaid, underperforming fund manager. There’s a lot of them about.

More on Investing Articles

Calendar showing the date of 5th April on desk in a house
Investing Articles

Just 1 year’s Stocks and Shares ISA allowance could generate a £1,900 annual passive income. Here’s how!

Fretting about the upcoming Stocks and Shares ISA contribution deadline? Our writer has an upbeat approach, focusing on ongoing passive…

Read more »

Passive and Active: text from letters of the wooden alphabet on a green chalk board
Investing Articles

As global markets dip, British passive income stocks offer higher yields at cheaper prices

Mark Hartley takes a look at some higher-yielding FTSE stocks that have taken a hard hit in the past month.…

Read more »

Mindful young woman breathing out with closed eyes, calming down in stressful situation, working on computer in modern kitchen.
Investing Articles

2 ‘overpriced’ FTSE 100 shares I’ve got my eye on if the stock market crashes

Never one to miss an opportunity, our writer is putting cash aside to buy quality FTSE 100 stocks in the…

Read more »

Young mixed-race woman looking out of the window with a look of consternation on her face
Investing Articles

With stock market risks emerging, is now the time to consider the 60/40 portfolio?

The stock market could be in for a period of turbulence. Here’s a simple strategy that can help long-term investors…

Read more »

Bus waiting in front of the London Stock Exchange on a sunny day.
Investing Articles

Is a stock market crash coming? It’s not too late to get ready!

Christopher Ruane sees reasons to fear a coming stock market crash. Rather than tying to time it, he's hoping to…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Down 4% in 2026, is now the time to consider buying Nvidia shares

Has Nvidia become too big to keep growing? Or is the stock’s decline this year a chance to think about…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Is the party finally over for Rolls-Royce shares?

Rolls-Royce shares have made investors rich but momentum is slowing and the Iran conflict isn't helping. How worried should we…

Read more »

Asian man looking concerned while studying paperwork at his desk in an office
Investing Articles

7.8% dividend yield! A dirt-cheap UK income share to buy today?

I’m on the hunt for lucrative passive income opportunities, and this under-the-radar FTSE stock currently offers a whopping 7.8% dividend…

Read more »