Are GlaxoSmithKline plc And Legal & General Group Plc Great Dividend Picks For 2016 And Beyond?

Is now the perfect time to buy high-yielding GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON:GSK) and Legal & General Group Plc (LON:LGEN)?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

sdf

There are some cracking dividends on offer at the moment among the elite companies of the FTSE 100.

The index itself currently yields 3.9%, but a number of individual stocks are flaunting considerably higher yields.

Today, I’m looking at whether GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) at 5.8% and Legal & General (LSE: LGEN) at 5.2% are great dividend picks for 2016 and beyond.

GlaxoSmithKline

GlaxoSmithKline has faced a number of headwinds in recent years, as have its big pharma peers. Constrained public health budgets, expiring patents and competition from generics have hit top- and bottom-line growth. For Glaxo, a bribery scandal in China hasn’t helped, either.

The table below show some key earnings and dividend data for the company.

  2012 2013 2014 2015 forecast 2016 forecast
Earnings per share growth (%) -2 -4 -12 -20 +11
Dividend per share growth (%) +6 +5 +3 0 0
Dividend cover 1.5x 1.4x 1.2x 0.9x 1.1x

As you can see, earnings began to decline at an accelerating rate from 2012, yet management continued to increase the dividend each year, with the result that dividend cover began to drop.

Obviously, a trajectory of falling earnings and rising dividends can’t continue indefinitely, and earlier this year — with earnings forecast to plunge 20% — Glaxo’s management took the decision to hold the 2015 dividend at the same 80p level as 2014. And also intends to hold it at 80p for 2016 and 2017.

As the table shows, earnings won’t quite cover the 2015 dividend. However, the good news is that analyst are expecting Glaxo to return to earnings growth in 2016, with an 11% rise, which reflects guidance from the company itself. Earnings would then be back to covering the dividend, albeit by a slim 1.1x.

Additionally, though, Glaxo has taken steps to help it get through the dip in dividend cover. As well as the ordinary dividend, management had originally intended to pay a special dividend of a further 80p for 2015, out of cash realised from a deal with Novartis. However, the Board has decided to reduce the special to 20p; thus retaining most of the cash from Novartis, effectively making the ordinary dividend more secure through the next couple of years of lean cover.

Obviously, investors can’t expect to see an increase in Glaxo’s dividend until after 2017 — and rises for a few years thereafter are likely to lag earnings growth, until the company has rebuilt dividend cover, probably to around the 1.5x level. However, the current high starting yield of 5.8% (excluding the 20p one-off special dividend) appears good compensation, and now could be a good time to buy a slice of this world-class business.

Legal & General

In contrast to Glaxo, Legal & General has been on a roll in recent years. The insurer and asset manager has been increasing earnings at a good clip, and shareholders have seen tasty annual rises in their dividends.

The table below show some key earnings and dividend data for the company.

  2012 2013 2014 2015 forecast 2016 forecast
Earnings per share growth (%) +11 +10 +10 +14 +7
Dividend per share growth (%) +20 +22 +21 +19 +7
Dividend cover 1.8x 1.6x 1.5x 1.4x 1.4x

As you can see, while Glaxo has been suffering falling earnings, L&G has been knocking out regular double-digit annual growth — and increasing the dividend at twice the rate of earnings.

Management has been keen that shareholders benefit from the recovery since the financial crisis, but we should note that the generous dividend payouts have brought cover down from 1.8x to an expected 1.4x this year. The boom period for dividend growth is over, and L&G is expected to increase payouts in line with earnings growth going forward, maintaining dividend cover at around 1.4x.

L&G is a strong business, and mid-to-high single digit earnings and dividend growth looks sustainable for the foreseeable future. The forecast 2016 dividend gives a yield of 5.2%, which appears highly attractive when combined with the company’s decent growth prospects for the years ahead.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

G A Chester has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Close up of manual worker's equipment at construction site without people.
Investing Articles

With H1 profits back on track, is this FTSE 250 housebuilder ready to bounce back?

Operating profits are down 22% at Vistry. But as cost issues give way to government support, could the FTSE 250…

Read more »

Investing Articles

2 fantastic UK growth stocks to consider for a Stocks and Shares ISA

Looking for opportunities for a Stocks and Shares ISA portfolio? Our writer shares two ideas from the London Stock Exchange.

Read more »

DIVIDEND YIELD text written on a notebook with chart
Investing Articles

Investors could target £8,840 of annual dividend income from 5,851 shares in this FTSE 250 high-yield star!

Shares in this FTSE 250 stock generate a much higher dividend yield than the index average and can produce potentially…

Read more »

Arrow symbol glowing amid black arrow symbols on black background.
Investing Articles

HSBC’s share price has dipped 5% to just over £9, so should I buy more right now?

HSBC’s share price has dipped in recently, but this could signal a bargain to be had. I ran the key…

Read more »

many happy international football fans watching tv
Investing Articles

Is this FTSE 250 stock gearing up to more than double its market cap by October?

Our writer considers the implications of a recent stock market announcement for the share price of this FTSE 250 retailer.…

Read more »

Inflation in newspapers
Investing Articles

3 overlooked UK shares growing dividends faster than inflation

Mark Hartley highlights three lesser-known UK shares offering inflation-beating dividends, while noting key risks investors should watch.

Read more »

Belfast City Sunset with colorful twilight over Lagan Weir Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge spanning over the Lagan River in downtown Belfast
Investing Articles

My 3 ‘secret’ rules I always follow when hunting passive income stocks

Mark Hartley reveals three perhaps not-so-secret tips he uses to ensure his passive income strategy doesn't come back to bite…

Read more »

Man riding the bus alone
Investing Articles

Is there a good reason to consider Greggs shares?

Greggs' shares have been in a state of decline over the past 12 months. However, Dr James Fox remains concerned…

Read more »