Can GlaxoSmithKline PLC Rule The World?

Does GlaxoSmithKline PLC (LON:GSK) have the fundamentals to rule the world?

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

The world needs vaccines: these products are as vital to the human race as food, water and shelter, so it must follow then that the companies developing and producing medicines and vaccines must command significant global influence. Without vaccines, the human race might face extinction.

GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) was established in 2000 by the merger of GlaxoWellcome and Smith Kline Beecham. It is a UK-based pharmaceutical company, and using market capitalisation, it is the world’s fourth-largest pharmaceutical company after Novartis, Pfizer and Merck.

Glaxo employs almost 100,000 people in over 100 countries — more than 13 thousand of these employees work in research — and development and by their own admission Glaxo claims to be one of the world’s leading research-based pharmaceutical and healthcare companies”.

  Market Capitalisation (US$ Billion)
Novartis                                                                 207.33
Pfizer                                                                     196.98
Merck & Co                                                            168.35
GlaxoSmithKline                                                    127.25

Operating in several sectors, Glaxo make prescription medicines, vaccines, over-the-counter medicines, oral care and nutritional healthcare products. However, following a worldwide review of business, Glaxo has made the decision to sell its oncology portfolio and strengthen its vaccines business as an asset swap with consideration to Swiss drugs producer Novartis. Glaxo said it wanted to narrow its focus on the “key areas of vaccines, respiratory, consumer and HIV medicines, and this deal could be followed by the disposal of its portfolio of older drugs.”

gskChief executive Andrew Witty said that these core areas made up 70 percent of the business and it was accelerating a review of its product portfolio that made up about half of the remainder. In addition, Glaxo and Novartis are set to create a ‘world-leading’ consumer healthcare business, in which Glaxo will assume majority control with a 63.5% equity interest. This is expected to have a revenue stream of over US$ 6bn annually.

As Novartis confirmed this deal, it also announced Eli Lilly will buy its animal health division for about $5.4bn.  If this is the first wave of realignment of assets throughout the pharmaceutical industry, it is difficult to forecast how the major league tables will change over the years ahead. Its seems the days of traditional large-scale M&A deals, where previously pharmaceutical companies amalgamated, are gone and instead the major industry players are taking position in niche areas in which they can be the leading player and command market dominance.

Can GlaxoSmithKline rule the world? Well, it certainly has its sights set on being the market leader in vaccines… this is an important sector, and if any one drug manufacturer can take monopolistic control over the world’s vaccine production, then yes, it can rule the world.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Lisa does not own any share in GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

No savings? I’d use the Warren Buffett method to target big passive income

This Fool looks at a couple of key elements of Warren Buffett's investing philosophy that he thinks can help him…

Read more »

Investing Articles

This FTSE 100 hidden gem is quietly taking things to the next level

After making it to the FTSE 100 index last year, Howden Joinery Group looks to be setting its sights on…

Read more »

Investing Articles

A £20k Stocks and Shares ISA put into a FTSE 250 tracker 10 years ago could be worth this much now

The idea of a Stocks and Shares ISA can scare a lot of people away. But here's a way to…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

What next for the Lloyds share price, after a 25% climb in 2024?

First-half results didn't do much to help the Lloyds Bank share price. What might the rest of the year and…

Read more »

Investing Articles

I’ve got my eye on this FTSE 250 company

The FTSE 250's full of opportunities for investors willing to do the search legwork, and I think I've found one…

Read more »

Investing Articles

This FTSE 250 stock has smashed Nvidia shares in 2024. Is it still worth me buying?

Flying under most investors' radars, this FTSE 250 stock has even outperformed the US chip maker year-to-date. Where will its…

Read more »

Investing Articles

£11k stashed away? I’d use it to target a £1,173 monthly passive income starting now

Harvey Jones reckons dividend-paying FTSE 100 shares are a great way to build a long-term passive income with minimal effort.

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

10% dividend increase! Is IMI one of the best stocks to buy in the FTSE 100 index?

To me, this firm's multi-year record of well-balanced progress makes the FTSE 100 stock one of the most attractive in…

Read more »