Skip Navigation
 

Five Ways To Beat The Credit Crunch

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

The Right Financial Decision

Published in Your Money on 15 September 2008

As stock markets and house prices lurch downwards, we suggest some simple steps to strengthen your finances.

I’m writing this article during a day that has already been christened ‘Meltdown Monday’ or ‘Black Monday’. News of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, the fourth-largest investment bank in the US, has sent stock markets tumbling across the world. Also across the Atlantic, fellow ‘bulge bracket’ bank Merrill Lynch has been bailed out by Bank of America while America’s largest insurance company, AIG, has requested $40 billion of emergency funding from the US Federal Reserve.

To be blunt, today has been a brutal ‘bonfire of the banks’. As I write, the share price of HBOS, the UK’s biggest mortgage lender, has crashed by almost three-eighths (37%) with other British banks’ shares down between 4% and 16%. Blimey!

From Wall Street to our high streets

Even if you own no stake in the financial firms floored by today’s news, you could still lose out in future. That’s because plunging asset prices have wiped out tens of billions of the banks’ spare capital, leaving them unable or unwilling to lend to any but the most credit-worthy individuals and firms. Hence, as banks reduce their leverage (borrowing heavily in order to make greater but riskier returns), I expect the credit crunch to worsen in the weeks and months to come.

This will cause two immediate problems for hard-pressed borrowers. First, the cost of credit will rise: we’ve already had interest-rate rises on credit cards, mortgages, personal loans and overdrafts. Second, the availability of credit will fall further, making it difficult to borrow more or refinance existing borrowings.

It’s time to turn the tanker around...

It’s quite clear that the next leg of the credit crunch -- fuelled by missed payments and bad debts -- will be downwards. Hence, even if you have already taken some steps towards improving your financial health, it makes good sense to batten down the hatches in case the hurricane strikes. Here are five simple ways to improve your household finances, starting today:

1. Be better at budgeting

The people most at risk during downturns are those who, knowingly or unwittingly, live well beyond their means. Of course, constantly spending more than you earn is a recipe for financial ruin. However, in recent years, raised consumer confidence (bolstered by seemingly ever-rising house prices) has masked Britain’s spendthrift ways. Thus, it’s vital to build a strong foundation to your personal finances by learning how to budget.

2. Massage your mortgage

With over 11.8 million mortgages in the UK, close to half of all UK households have a hefty debt to service every month. Indeed, the interest alone on our £1,218 billion of home loans exceeds £6 billion a month. 

Of course, as with all debts, the secret to a happy home loan is to minimise how much you pay in interest and fees. By remortgaging, you can try to trim your monthly repayments down to size, so give our award-winning, no-fee mortgage service a try.

3. Bash your borrowing

On top of mortgages, we’ve also built up an impressive £231 billion in non-mortgage debt, such as credit and store cards, car and personal loans, and overdrafts. 

To avoid paying excessive rates of interest and sky-high fines for unauthorised borrowing, it makes sense to tidy up your existing borrowing. For example, by transferring your card debts to a credit card offering 0% balance transfers, you can freeze interest until as far ahead as January 2010.

4. Prune your premiums

Another good habit to adopt is to avoid automatically renewing your insurance policies. In other words, when your yearly renewal notice arrives, don’t just lazily accept your insurer’s latest premium hike. Instead, shop around in order to find quality quotes for car, home, life and travel insurance. Your aim is to get the same or better cover for less cash and, thanks to the wonders of the Web, this is quicker and easier than it’s ever been.

5. Strengthen your savings

Once you’ve knocked your finances into reasonable shape, put some effort into boosting your savings. By earning more interest and avoiding tax on it, you can raise the returns from your spare cash. To get started, read Top Savings Accounts For £25 and £25,000 and Don’t Get Caught In This Savings Trap.

Lastly, by getting to grips with your day-to-day finances, you can limit the impact of any economic slump and, therefore, reduce your risk of ruin. What’s more, it should help you to sleep easier at night!

More: Save money with cheaper gas and electricity tariffs | Why It Pays To Be A Tart | When Debt Turns To Despair

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Beagle2Mars 16 Sep 2008, 8:35am

You need the Foolish tip of buying shares with any leftovers after longterm saving.

Thanks for number 5. I automatically renewed my Tesco home insurance to find it had gone up by £100 - I've had no claims! I fared much better on my car insurance by going with More Than - treat price, great customer service. I'm £150 better off with that so £50 up. Better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick as my Grandad used to say.

karatekate 16 Sep 2008, 9:09am

Lots of common sense tips here, however on the one hand you state that re-financing is going to be tougher, and interest rates will increase, whilst on the other hand you suggest 're-mortgaging' at lower rate and swapping credit cards - with the credit crunch/freeze, it will be nearly impossible to re-mortgage or swap credit card unless you are in a position where the credit crunch doesn't actually affect you - where you credit rating is AAAAA***** and actually you don't NEED a mortgage....

SaidRich 16 Sep 2008, 9:52am

Frankly I find it disgusting that our government/s have allowed such lax conduct by banks and building societies etc., to enable a vast number of people to get into so much debt. Whilst self discipline and self control of spending is obviously the best form of avoiding Debt/High Interest charges and ultimate poverty, there used to be strict rules of limitation on what 9ndividuals could take on- based upon the level of their income. My view is that banks and building societies etc., who have done this mis-service should now pay the price and stand the cost of extended borrowing and NOT be allowed to foreclose( a simple word with massive impact. Their greed has been the ultimate motivation!

RosemaryPettit 16 Sep 2008, 10:17am

It's not just the banks that have been greedy and imprudent. So have individuals. Those that have got into debt have forgotten Mr Micawber's advice about income and spending - misery and happiness.

ARTFool54321 16 Sep 2008, 10:28am

"Frankly I find it disgusting that our government/s have allowed such lax conduct by banks and building societies etc., to enable a vast number of people to get into so much debt."

Frankly I find it disgusting that people have allowed themselves to get into so much debt. I wish people would actually take some responsability for their own lives and not expect the government to lead them every step of the way. Does the government go to the bank, take out a loan and pack you off on holiday? Does the government max out your credit card and limit you to minimum payments? Has the government been warning about over-extended debt for the last 3 years?

BabyBoomer1 16 Sep 2008, 10:46am

Well, I put solely the blame on this Goverment, for debt. This Goverment has been continually borrowing, as if there is no tomorrow, and telling people that the economy is in good shape! No more Boom and Bust. I think personally this is the biggest bust of All times!

And this Goverment have no money in the kitty, which they should have reserved for a rainy day!

muncher100 16 Sep 2008, 11:19am

ARTFool54321 - It is true that people have to take responsibility for their own actions however there are a multitude of reasons why people find themselves in debt. And, it not always their fault (take the thousands of people who may be made redundant at Lehman Brothers). Many of them may not have a savings pot to fall back on. What will they do in these cash strapped times? I have to agree with karatekate too, many people will not be able to transfer balances or re-mortgage full stop so offering this kind of advice to the majority of people who cannot benefit from it seems slightly confusing - thanks all the same Cliff!

keith1942 16 Sep 2008, 11:36am

2 of your corespondents berate the goverment for not stepping in and telling the banks to control lending. I can see the banner headlines now 'goverment interferes in finacial services' and the indignation spouting from the various comment columns. this problem is solely the problem of the banks who must accept responsibilities for their own actions, something sadly lacking through out the modern world.

boykog 16 Sep 2008, 12:23pm

Have you ever thought that the system is doomed for ever!!
And its not from yesterday! Since the Big Bang, the Big Depression in 1929, it became obvious that something must be done. 80 years down the road we are in the same situation?? Are humans so stupid or what?
Greed and irresponsibility - this is the answer? Individually and as groups or majestic economists/bankers/highflyers etc.
This is pure crime and must be outlawed!
All thouse big financial institutions can not control themselves! They proved it once again? And I have no pity whatsover for all those "work hard play hard" men and women motivated only by money! (Remember the glee on their faces around Christmas magabonuses-giveaway time?
I just pity those 25,000 old people who will die this winter either from cold or hunger?

soapwelder 16 Sep 2008, 12:27pm

The credit crunch has absolutely nothing to do with the Government. The root cause was the aggressive and unscrupulous marketing of expensive mortgages to America's poor, who hadn't a cat in hell's chance of keeping up the payments once the attractive introductory terms had expired. Before they did and the inevitable problems began the lenders parcelled up the loans, gave them fancy names and sold them on to major banks and building societies across the world, who lapped them up as high-yield property-secured investments. Perhaps if their due diligence had been more thorough they might have seen how insecure these securities really were. But, hey, there are profit targets to be met and bonuses to be paid, right?

I suspect this will go down in history as one of the biggest confidence tricks ever perpetrated among the world's financial institutions. Belatedly, the FBI is now seeking to bring charges of fraud against some of the original mortgage lenders but that will do nothing to help the thousands whose homes have been repossessed. Meanwhile the banks and other lenders, having discovered that a large slice of their assets are worthless, have less money to lend to the rest of us.

MoneyMat 16 Sep 2008, 12:35pm

Million dollar, and pound, bonuses to push management and staff into encouraging ever more risky lending to less and less suitable borrowers has made sad reading for many years. It has also made many hard working, honourable folk feel less able since they have not been endulged with such ridiculous bonuses, extravagant freeby holiday awards, and been able to go out buying ridiculously expensive pink champagne, cocktails, cars, and push up prices of tinsel properties.

We are all going to feel the effects of such extravagant behaviour by the bosses and then the staff for some considerable time - will we learn from these excesses and their consequence, history unfortunately suggests that we shall not, well not for very long anyway.

australia99 16 Sep 2008, 1:17pm

does this mean that I would be wise to cash in my endowment policy asap?

colin106 16 Sep 2008, 1:21pm

Well said soapwelder - though the government is NOT blameless - spending money it hasn't got mainly to buy votes to keep the leaders and MPs in jobs, and therefore running a massive deficit, which our children will have to pay the interest on, and leaving no room for manoevre now the chickens have come home to roost.

colin106 16 Sep 2008, 1:27pm

To avoid the coming financial tsunami - virtually inevitable - suggest those with savings, investments put half into Swiss Government Guaranteed 3.5% bonds and half into gold bullion via Bullion Vault - an excellent company I have been using for years. Gold is now about £433 per ounce and is forecast to go much higher as a source of value, as Governments print more and more money thereby devaluing it. And the Swiss bonds may well appreciate as the pound goes down against the franc.

teaboy100 16 Sep 2008, 1:38pm

Muncher100 - Lehman employees were earning very good salaries and bonuses up until Friday. If they had been prudent, and saved, then they will be able to survive the current problems.
There are very few people who don't have any control over the debt position they find themselves in today.
As other posters have already stated quite correctly, there is no-one else to blame but yourself.
PS this government is too busy gorging on all its self-awarded freebies, so please don't rely on them sorting out any of this country's problems.

Penelopedot 16 Sep 2008, 1:48pm

I have saved and been prudent like a lot of other people and now, aged 62, find a reduction in my pension payout more than likely, (after losing one pension to Mr Brown's moneygrab).
I have an Endowment policy which finishes in April 2009 - how much is that likely to be short now (although I have been told continuously for the last eight years that it is on track) I have no time to make up any deficit!
My home, which is my home and was bought to live in, not as an investment, is now far too large for just me and my husband, but, of course, I can't sell it now to allow us to downsize.
I am so much better off than many, and I am thankfull for that, but what was the point of being thrifty when other people can affect our lives so badly. I feel quite distraught by it all.

churchill123 16 Sep 2008, 1:55pm

Just goes to show how little the present government has done. If they have no control over the markets, which is very self evident, how can they claim victory for low unemployment in the past? Free market economics I think...

Fact is that we have the highest tax burden since ww2 and really nothing to show for it, and nothing in the treasury to help people who are about to or have lost their only means of income.

Labour seem to have a habit of doing this.

kbaily 16 Sep 2008, 2:32pm

The FSA are supposed to regulate our banks to ensure that they don't trade in such a risky manner, they obviously haven't been doing their job very well.
Also, the FSA have implemented an initiative for banks and insurance companies called Treating Customers Fairly. I think most banks have ignored this principle when they decided to lend money to those that they know have little chance of being able to pay it back!

onetrackminds 16 Sep 2008, 2:52pm

Don't mean to be funny but why is it that all the the so called "governing bodies or watchdogs" such as oftel, fsa etc.. seem to be run in a manner whereby they require permission from the very companies they're meant to oversee in order to lay down guidance rules? I feel very sorry for all those who have lost their jobs and or savings in this serious error of fiscal management but I had hoped that after Nothern rock, Fannie mae etc.. the FSA might develop some teeth. Would it be possible to bring civil or criminal proceedings against a bank for negligence resulting in loss of financial stability (as a customer whose faith has been severely shaken in ones ficundiary) or is that a long shot?

gordonbanks42 16 Sep 2008, 5:10pm

I think it is probably true that the senior managements of banks did not know until relatively recently how much dodgy debt they really had on their books (cos it didn't seem to be that dodgy), so how was the FSA supposed to know?
There is a fine line between under-regulation (which permits occasional bad practice) and over-regulation( which prevents innovation). Most of the time the FSA will be one side of that line or the other, not bang on it. If we want the UK to be a major financial centre, that will only happen if the FSA stays on the "pro-innovation" side of the line. Each crisis has the same structure but different content - that's the way crises are.
Any by the way - the relatively large effect of the credit crunch on the UK has a lot less to do with the presence of big banks in the City than it has to do with the way we house ourselves - debt-financed ownership(like the Americans) rather than renting (like the Europeans). Remember - the credit crunch first hit the man in the street via a shortage of mortgage funds. That is largely the sum of a lot of personal choices rather than Government incompetence or banks' misdeeds. I should add that it is also partly the result of Mrs T's "reform" of the Bank/Building Society sector which allowed (perhaps even encouraged) the mortgage lenders to flood the market with hot money whenever they dared.

DavidJHearn 16 Sep 2008, 7:38pm

Onetrackminds: by "ficundiary" (non-word) I think you meant fiduciary.

But I had to think a bit!

geraldrbridges 16 Sep 2008, 8:16pm

Most of the people getting hurt by this credit crunch have possibly only got them selves to blame by telling lies on their application forms, also borrowing more than they can afford in repayment terms, so unlucky them,

minimumwager 16 Sep 2008, 9:42pm

I don't think the blame lies with any one side in the sloppy lending by the banks verses irresponsible borrowing by people debate. Rather in various circumstances blended together to create this problem. I think there has indeed been some borrowing by people for ridiculous reasons such as having the latest designer gear. But also some individuals have been placed in financial dire straights through no fault of their own, such as unemployment. There has been a dramatic shift of emphasis in financial institutions away from responsible lending, to an all out aggressive sales pitch of loans and credit cards, but you can just say no. (That is if your not using them to try to meet essential bills, whereby your options are limited and you will be desparate to keep the house, or pay for food etc) But also our consumer culture plays a part. "Buy it now, the latest gadget, why wait?" Seems to be the message in capitalist land. There is no incentive or rights for prudent behaviour it seems. For example,(and please correct me if I am wrong as I am an ignoramous) the Sale of Goods Act entitles consumers to return goods if not fit for purpose for 6 years. But instead all shops ignore this to try to sell you guarentees for three years, when your rights are enshrined in law. And if your TV blew up after 4 years you get bounced between the shop you bought it and the manufacturer it came from if you try to discscuss this act. Its far less hastle to buy a new one. We need quality purchases not quantity. And thrift should be encouraged!!

john8pies 16 Sep 2008, 11:00pm

.....erm, what happens when we have followed all the above tips, lived within our means, shopped around for competitively priced financial products, etc, only for American banks to recklessly lend money to people who haven`t got a hope in hell`s chance of repaying it, meaning the banks charge us mugs higher interest and the like to recoup their self-inflicted losses???!

skina 17 Sep 2008, 7:46am

Blaming the Government on this is ridiculous and a little disengenious: people and businesses have to face the consequences of their financial decisions in order to understand that THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES. I work in consumer credit and to be honest the people I am dealing with will max out one card and then start on another. You can't stop them as they feel 'entitled' to run round shops indulging themselves, until the time comes where their payments are hurting them so much that they are using the cards to pay for their food shopping, petrol and bills. Now the attitude appears crazy, but when the property prices were rising by the month we could all absolve our consciences by telling ourselves that one day we could sell our houses, pay off our cards and relax in the sunshine. Where I see secured lending I am often seeing defaulted payments: where is the fun in paying your debts?This is consumer naivety. That said, I have low balances on my cards, and am now receiving monthly limit increases and letters offering me financial rewards for using my cards. Perhaps this consumer naivety has been fostered and encouraged by the banks (though, again, would we really be happy if the Government took a hard line on this and started interfering?). We can all learn something in the coming slowdown, but something tells me that the majority of people (and businesses) will choose not to. Just look at the paper millionaries of the 80's who became the bankrupt litigants of the 90's. I think we have been warned by history more than a few times.

jamesunsen 20 Sep 2008, 7:01pm

Houses are overpriced at the moment, I believe by a factor of 2 to 3. Until this is rectified, we have all built our houses on the sand, and the storms will come.
more strife for banks and homeowners.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.