Neil Woodford Buys Wm. Morrison Supermarkets Plc

Published in Company Comment on 11 March 2013

Harvey Jones digs into WM. Morrison Supermarkets plc (LSE: MRW).

It's time to go shopping for shares again, but where to start? There are loads of great stocks to choose from, and I've got my wallet out. So should I buy WM. Morrison Supermarkets plc (LSE: MRW)?

Supermarket purchase

When dividend maestro Neil Woodford takes a major position in a FTSE 100 stock, it is worth taking notice. He has just bought a fat slice of WM. Morrison Supermarkets, making him the company's largest investor at 7.69% (up from 5.33%). So what's so special about Morrisons? And should I buy it as well?

Woodford is picking and choosing his supermarkets carefully these days. Last year, he sold out of the UK's biggest supermarket chain Tesco (LSE: TSCO) (NASDAQOTH: TSCDY.US), complaining it wasn't the defensive stock he had hoped. But is Morrisons? Is any UK retailer defensive, in these troubled times? Life is tough for UK grocery chains as their customer's wages fall behind inflation, but it has been particularly tough for Morrisons, which has come off worse in a dogfight with discount chains Aldi and Lidl. Its most recent trading update, published in January, showed a 2.5% drop in like-for-like sales. That was enough for fund manager BlackRock, which ditched more than half its 10% stake. Enter Woodford.

Horses for courses

It has been a dismal five years for Morrisons, the UK's fourth-largest supermarket. Its share price is still down 10% on five years ago, although Tesco also posted a 5% drop, while Sainsbury's (LSE: SBRY) (NASDAQOTH: JSAIY.US) barely managed 1% growth. Morrisons is struggling to reverse its recent slide in sales this year, although at least it avoided the horse meat scandal, unlike rivals Tesco, Asda, Lidl, Iceland, the Co-Op and Aldi, who were all forced to withdraw products. Yet Sainsbury's was the only supermarket to race ahead as a result, registering a 4.6% rise in sales in the 12 weeks to 17 February, according to data from Kantar Worldpanel. Blameless Morrisons suffered a 1.3% sales drop, losing yet more ground on its rivals. So what does Woodford see in it?

As a value investor, he may be impressed by Morrison's turnaround potential. Management has blamed the recent slide on its lack of smaller, convenience stores and internet no-show, and is working to reverse both omissions, and has claimed some success for its 10,000-product Own Brand relaunch. Its financial position is strong, with net debt of around £2.1 billion, and it is running a share buyback programme. Morrison currently yields 4.1%, covered 2.4 times, and management has a progressive dividend policy. That is a more generous return than Tesco, which yields 3.9% covered 2.4 times, but less than Sainsbury's, which yields a meaty (but not horse-meaty) 4.7%, covered 1.7 times.

A reason to buy Morrison

Given its recent travails, Morrisons is trading on a tempting valuation of 10.3 times earnings, roughly in line with Tesco, but cheaper than admired rival Sainsbury's at 12.2 times. An undemanding valuation and attractive dividend are the most tempting reasons to buy Morrisons. But with projected earnings per share growth of -1% to January 2014, and just 4% to January 2015, please don't expect instant results. Especially if the Bank of England's easy inflation policy further erodes Morrison's customer spending power. Tesco is the only supermarket I hold, after recent share price falls made it seem irresistibly cheap. Right now, one is enough for me.

This may be a more rewarding growth prospect. Motley Fool share analysts have found what they believe is the single best UK growth stock of this year. They are so impressed, they have named it Motley Fool’s Top Growth Share For 2013. To find out more, download our free report. It won’t cost you a penny, so click here now

> Harvey owns shares in Tesco, but doesn't own any other company mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares in Tesco.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

ProfessorMarcus 11 Mar 2013 , 10:27am

It's interesting that Woodford has bought before Morrison's results on Thursday 14th March.

theRealGrinch 11 Mar 2013 , 2:23pm

I picked these shares up earlier in the year alone with vodafone and rio tino.

TheHowler 11 Mar 2013 , 4:49pm

He might have been better off holding onto Tesco, isn't it up ~15% since he sold?

Donaferentes 11 Mar 2013 , 4:58pm

Have dipped modestly into MRW today. Some +'s would include:
favourable p/e; good dividend record, cover and current level;
slashed management bonuses following 2012 disaster; no horese meat in Morrisons as they control their own meat supply chains; emphasis on fresh products and diversifying into clothes, household etc; current retail crisis means property slump/surpluses help planned expansion; long lead time to replace FD (do we have name of replacement yet?); comparing our local MRW with TESCO - latter is still struggling to offer positive customer experience and, finally, Woodford has bought in more and he's a canny stock picker.

Jonesey12 11 Mar 2013 , 5:02pm

Wise thoughts, Donaferentes.

And TheHowler: Vodafone has also thrived since Woodford sold. But of course, these are short-term moves. He has both eyes on the long-term.

Harvey Jones, article author

jaizan 11 Mar 2013 , 7:50pm

In principle, I prefer to learn off great investors.
However, analysing the Buffet-Woodford-Tesco thing again & again teaches us nothing new. Now there are other fine investors out there, so perhaps some of them might feature in future articles?

eccyman 11 Mar 2013 , 9:06pm

@jaizan

Agree 100%.

There's no doubt Neil Woodford is a great fund manager, however I would like to hear from others on here.One obvious candidate would be Terry Smith of Fundsmith...

LiverpoolDelta 12 Mar 2013 , 1:12am

None of the Fool reader rate or like Woodford... Please stop defending his bad decision to sell Tesco and trying to hype his name. He's nothing but a two-bit trader!

DVB99 12 Mar 2013 , 10:08am

Most people are looking at it from a short-term perspective, whereas Woodford takes a long-term perspective.
Yes he sold Tesco a few months ago and it has gone up since, similar with Vodafone, but these are just short-term price movements. We won't be able to judge him until 3\4\5 years from now regarding these decisions
Secondly, why not Morrison, it probably has the most potential - no\underdeveloped online offering etc...

GoldenSoldier 12 Mar 2013 , 2:08pm

“Its share price is still down 10% on five years ago”

I find such statements confusing. Presumably this refers to the nominal price, although I thought it was nearer to 5%. The real price is down almost 20%.

I think that when comparing current prices to prices in the past, the word “price” should always be qualified to indicate whether real or nominal. For me only real prices are meaningful.

GS

lameuse 12 Mar 2013 , 5:31pm

Tesco's lack of "positive customer experience" is often mentioned. It's a pretty subjective notion so I cannot argue with it but I can't see how people would find Morrison's more 'exciting'. For me, the only negative about Tesco is that it is big and many people don't like it purely for that reason.
I remain a long term fan of Tesco. Whilst I wish Morrison's well, I do not see any way they are going to 'amaze' us in the short to medium term.

ANuvver 12 Mar 2013 , 11:02pm

LiverpoolDelta:

Woodford's TSCO and NG calls recently have come in for criticism, it's true. I happen to agree with him over regulatory risks on the latter.

That's the point, really. He may be many things, but seemingly first and foremost a risk manager, and certainly not a trader.

I'd be far more interested personally in the question of how he's repositioning with the proceeds. His "limit the downside" approach is close to my heart, and seems to be increasingly out of vogue in these "dash for growth when the fundamentals don't support it" days.

So he's so far missed 15% on TSCO. Both he and Buffet missed far more than that over dotcoms and banks. Worth considering.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.