Should I Swap HSBC Holdings plc For Legal & General Group Plc?

You might expect HSBC Holdings (LSE: HSBA) (NYSE: HSBC.US) and Legal & General Group (LSE: LGEN) to deliver fairly similar shareholder returns: a decent yield, steady earnings growth, but nothing too spectacular.

You’d be wrong.

Over the last five years, shareholder returns from Legal & General shares have hammered those of HSBC:


Legal & General


5-year share price gain



5-year average annual total return



Of course, much of this is due to the impact of the financial crisis, and the bad debts and increased regulatory demands banks have had to deal with since then. Before the financial crisis, the returns from these two businesses were more similar.

However, this has made me wonder whether banks are worth owning at all, given high-quality financial alternatives such as Legal & General.

Results time

L&G published its full-year results for 2014 today, prompting a 3% fall in the firm’s share price.

However, there was nothing much to dislike in the numbers, which compare very well to HSBC’s recent full-year results:

2014 results

Legal & General


Earnings per share growth



Dividend growth



Return on equity



Obviously part of the problem is that HSBC spent $3,012m on various legal settlements and compensation payouts in 2014, whereas L&G’s business manages to operate without incurring epic charges for misconduct, so is able to return more money to shareholders.

Is it too late to switch?

The question now is whether it’s too late to switch: will banks like HSBC soon have their day in the sun, while growth slows at L&G?

That’s definitely a possibility — and it could be the reason why L&G shares slipped lower today.

L&G depends on selling annuities for a large part of its income. Following the recent changes to the pension rules, which mean that individual retirees will no longer have to use their pension pots to buy an annuity, L&G has switched its focus to selling large-scale annuities to corporate pension schemes.

However, some analysts are warning that these sales are unlikely to be as profitable as individual annuities, because corporate annuity buyers will drive a much harder bargain than most individual annuity buyers.

There’s also the question of valuation: HSBC currently trades on just 10.6 times 2015 forecast profits, and offers a 5.9% prospective yield. That’s cheap, by any standards.

In contrast, L&G trades on 14.2 times 2015 forecast earnings and offers a 4.9% prospective yield. It may be that for investors in both firms, the best choice is to stay put: as an HSBC shareholder, that’s what I’m going to do.

However, if you're searching for the most reliable dividends, it might be best to avoid the financial sector altogether.

That's what the Motley Fool's market-beating analysts decided recently, when they chose 5 top income stocks to retire on.

The companies concerned all have an impressive track record of dividend and earnings growth, and unlike HSBC and L&G, these companies are very unlikely to be affected by regulatory changes.

You can find full details of all five stocks in "5 Shares To Retire On".

It's free, without obligation and available now -- just click here.

Roland Head owns shares in HSBC Holdings. The Motley Fool UK has recommended HSBC Holdings. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.