Why I’m avoiding the siren call of the RBS share price

This is why I’m avoiding Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (LON: RBS) despite its low valuation.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

If it looks cheap, smells cheap, and acts cheap, it probably is cheap, and that’s the case with Royal Bank of Scotland Group (LSE: RBS) right now. Even as earnings recover and the firm restarts dividend payments, the share price continues to plunge, and I reckon there is a good chance RBS is cheap for a reason – and could get cheaper from where it is now, perhaps much cheaper.

Today’s third-quarter interim management statement hasn’t helped. The stock was down more than 5% in early trading this morning, continuing a slide since May of around 25%. Yet the figures are good. Operating profit is just over 10% higher than the equivalent period last year at £961m, adding to a total of £2,787m for the year so far, which is a far cry from the dark days of 2013 when the bank posted an operating loss for the year of £8,849m.

There may be trouble ahead

I reckon the market was spooked this morning because RBS has applied “an additional” £100 million impairment charge “reflecting the more uncertain economic outlook” and a £60 million impairment charge in its Irish business because of “ongoing sales from our loan book to further reduce the level of non-performing loans.” The bank is preparing for trouble ahead and, right on cue, the share price reacted in the way out-and-out cyclical shares are ‘supposed’ to behave – it fell.

I watched a discussion on Bloomberg TV this week where several ‘experts’ were discussing bank stocks in general. They argued that because banks have been building up their capital reserves they are better prepared than ever to withstand the next cyclical shock in the economy, or the next down-leg if you will. One even declared that banks are the new defensives because they are so safe and reliable for investors now. It was in essence that old stock-market chestnut that has been debunked many times over the years: ‘this time it’s different’. My response to that is, “Tosh! It’s never different.”

More of the same

If the economy dives, taking the profits of RBS with it, I reckon the shares will plunge too, and that reborn dividend that’s been so long in gestation will likely wither as well. We’ve seen today how responsive the shares are to even the slightest whiff of negative news in the outlook. It’s a huge risk for those participating in bank stocks right now, and the chance of a catastrophic plunge is always heightened when the banks are posting big profits, as now with RBS. What else can mark the top of a cycle but big profits? And after the top, comes the plunge to the bottom, otherwise it wouldn’t be a cycle and banks wouldn’t be known as cyclical stocks.

RBS said in today’s report that it retains the outlook guidance it provided with the 2017 accounts. Back then the firm said it is dealing with a range of “significant” risks and uncertainties in the external economic, political and regulatory environment and managing conduct-related investigations and litigation. The directors said then that “substantial additional charges and costs may be recognised in the coming quarters,” and we’ve seen some of that today. They’ve clearly got their eyes on the downside too, and said they “remain mindful of potential downside risks, particularly from single-name and sector-driven events.” I’m avoiding shares in RBS.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Portrait of elderly man wearing white denim shirt and glasses looking up with hand on chin. Thoughtful senior entrepreneur, studio shot against grey background.
Investing Articles

Here’s how much an investor would need in an ISA to earn a £10,000 second income this year (and every year!)

A five figure annual second income from a standing start? Christopher Ruane walks through the approach he's taking towards this…

Read more »

One English pound placed on a graph to represent an economic down turn
Investing Articles

The FTSE 100 hit an all-time high this week — but I still loaded up on this share!

In a ground-breaking week for the index, why has our writer been buying more of a FTSE 100 share that…

Read more »

A senior man and his wife holding hands walking up a hill on a footpath looking away from the camera at the view. The fishing village of Polperro is behind them.
Investing Articles

Here’s how an investor could find shares to buy for an early retirement

Our writer lays out some principles a retirement-focused investor could consider when scanning the market for possible shares to buy.

Read more »

Young mixed-race couple sat on the beach looking out over the sea
Investing Articles

8 pros and cons of buying shares as a passive income idea

Christopher Ruane buys dividend shares to generate passive income streams. Here's his candid assessment of some good and bad things…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Is £280 enough to start buying shares for the first time? Yes – and here’s why!

Christopher Ruane outlines how someone with under £300 available could start buying shares for the first time -- and why…

Read more »

Investing Articles

How an investor could use a Stocks and Shares ISA to target £1,120 in dividends annually

Here's how an investor could target four figures of passive income next year and every year from a £20K Stocks…

Read more »

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

5 pieces of Warren Buffett wisdom for new investors – and very old ones!

Christopher Ruane identifies a handful of lessons from billionaire investing legend Warren Buffett he uses himself in the stock market.

Read more »

Investing Articles

The 8% yield looks good but the Vodafone share price is still fighting for a recovery

Mark Hartley examines the reasons why the Vodafone share price continues to struggle and what this could mean for investors…

Read more »