Will Christmas dinner kill off Tesco plc?

What will the festive season say about the future of Tesco plc (LON: TSCO)?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Christmas is typically seen as a test of our top retailers, and it can provide a good barometer of fortune for our supermarkets. This year’s Yuletide could be a telling one for Tesco (LSE: TSCO), though I fear the tidings might not be good.

Good Housekeeping magazine has just published its annual survey of the cost of Christmas dinner, and it contains good news for feasting revellers — the 11 ingredients are now 10.8% cheaper than they were in 2009. But that’s not such good news for high street names like Tesco, who are facing growing competition and ever-thinner margins.

Relentless competition

This year it’s firmly down to those two interlopers Lidl and Aldi. The Christmas dinner index put Aldi firmly in the lead in the low-cost stakes, with an 8-person meal costing as little as £22.03p — notably cheaper than second-place Lidl at £24.57.

Tesco was squeezed out of third by Iceland, only managing fourth place at £28.08, just ahead of Asda at £29.68.

On its own, this survey perhaps shouldn’t be taken too seriously, but it does make me question the expectations some have for Tesco’s recovery over the next couple of years — analysts are predicting significant EPS growth, but it seems like it’s been “recovery next year” for years now.

And we’d still be looking at a forward P/E of more than 28, dropping only to around 21.5 based on 2018 predictions. I can’t, at this moment, see why Tesco should command a multiple of around twice the FTSE 100‘s long-term average, especially not with dividends still expected to be very low.

Competition hurting too?

Morrisons (LSE: MRW) is another one that could do poorly this Christmas, if the survey is anything to go by. With its dinner costing £31.12, Morrisons only managed a poor sixth place in terms of low cost, with its total price a full 40% more expensive than winner Aldi.

I remember the early days when Morrisons was expanding and capturing market share — and it was doing it by undercutting its rivals. Without a cost advantage, I really couldn’t think of any reason why I’d go there for any Christmas food shopping this year — or why I’d buy the shares.

And while Morrison is also expected to turn its fortunes around this year, we’d still be seeing earnings per share of only around half their pre-crunch levels, with the shares on a P/E of 21.

Most expensive?

At the other end of the list came Marks & Spencer (LSE: MKS) with its reassuringly expensive Christmas dinner at £49.90. I say reassuring, because higher quality food is the one thing that M&S does really well, and it’s going to be bought by shoppers who really don’t mind the cost of putting on a top spread each year.

M&S is struggling in other departments, and has repeatedly shown its inability to turn its clothing business round into growth. That means there’s a further fall in earnings on the cards this year, putting the shares on a P/E ratio of around 11.5. Dividend yields should be about 5.6%, though, albeit with cover that’s perhaps a little stretched.

But you know what? Of these three shares, M&S’s are the ones I’d be most likely to buy now.

And Christmas food shopping? I’ll be heading to a new shopping development half a mile from home that contains only two stores — Aldi and M&S Food.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

The key number that could signal a recovery for the Greggs share price in 2026

The Greggs share price has crashed in 2025, but is the company facing serious long-term challenges or are its issues…

Read more »

Rolls-Royce's Pearl 10X engine series
Investing Articles

Can the Rolls-Royce share price hit £16 in 2026? Here’s what the experts think

The Rolls-Royce share price has been unstoppable. Can AI data centres and higher defence spending keep the momentum going in…

Read more »

Businessman with tablet, waiting at the train station platform
Investing Articles

Up 150% in 5 years! What’s going on with the Lloyds share price?

The Lloyds share price has had a strong five years. Our writer sees reasons to think it could go even…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Where will Rolls-Royce shares go in 2026? Here’s what the experts say!

Rolls-Royce shares delivered a tremendous return for investors in 2025. Analysts expect next year to be positive, but slower.

Read more »

Emma Raducanu for Vodafone billboard animation at Piccadilly Circus, London
Investing Articles

Up 40% this year, can the Vodafone share price keep going?

Vodafone shareholders have been rewarded this year with a dividend increase on top of share price growth. Our writer weighs…

Read more »

Buffett at the BRK AGM
Investing Articles

Here’s why I like Tesco shares, but won’t be buying any!

Drawing inspiration from famed investor Warren Buffett's approach, our writer explains why Tesco shares aren't on his shopping list.

Read more »

Investing For Beginners

If the HSBC share price can clear these hurdles, it could fly in 2026

After a fantastic year, Jon Smith points out some of the potential road bumps for the HSBC share price, including…

Read more »

Investing Articles

I’m thrilled I bought Rolls-Royce shares in 2023. Will I buy more in 2026?

Rolls-Royce has become a superior company, with rising profits, buybacks, and shares now paying a dividend. So is the FTSE…

Read more »