Investing in banks is like playing financial Russian roulette

Judging by the Bank of England’s actions, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LON: LLOY) and its peers are dangerous.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

The Bank of England’s (BoE) mission is to promote the good of the people of the United Kingdom by maintaining monetary and financial stability.

The central bank of the UK sees great risk to the people of Britain from the nation’s big banks. That much is clear from a press release issued this week regarding a proposed timetable for bank stress testing.  

A veiled warning?

The tests are set to become more comprehensive because the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street sees a wide range of potential threats to the businesses of Britain’s big banks. I reckon investors should heed this veiled warning as any one of these risks could send profits and share prices plunging — perhaps permanently — at big banks such as Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY). 

Investing in banks now is like playing financial Russian Roulette with your savings, I reckon. You never know when the chamber is loaded. The potential financial carnage resulting from a ‘hit’ with one of the risks to banks is too great a price to pay for any upside that may materialise from an investment in them.

The BoE’s press release sets out the timetable for publishing the UK stress test results for 2016 and announces the firms that will take part in what the central bank calls its 2017 biennial exploratory scenario.

Cyclical risk

The 2016 stress test aims to assess the resilience of the UK banking system to a severe slowdown in the UK and global economies. In other words, risks associated with the natural rollout of the financial cycle. The BoE is analysing the results of initial stress test submissions received from Barclays, HSBC Holdings, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide Building Society, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Santander UK and Standard Chartered, and aims to publish the results alongside its Financial Stability Report on 30 November.

The BoE explains that the 2016 stress test assesses the resilience of the UK banking system to a severe slowdown in the domestic and global economies by applying a ‘tail risk’ scenario designed to be severe and broad enough to assess the ability of UK banks to withstand a severe shock. Not a forecast, the BoE insists, just a ‘what if’. However, for 2017 the tests will go much further than appraising the banks’ abilities to withstand mere cyclical shocks.

Testing resilience against wider threats

Next year the stress test of major banks will for the first time include two scenarios, the BoE says. In addition to the annual cyclical one, there will be an additional ‘exploratory’ scenario, which will allow the BoE  to assess banks’ resilience to a wider range of potential threats. Potential threats that are real and probable, I would argue. The longer investors hold on to their banking shares at this mature stage in their recovery from the financial crisis, the more likely they are to be hit by the manifestation of one of the risks — just like pointing a loaded gun at your head in a game of Russian Roulette.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Barclays and HSBC Holdings. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Warren Buffett at a Berkshire Hathaway AGM
Investing Articles

I’d follow Warren Buffett and start building a £1,900 monthly passive income

With a specific long-term goal for generating passive income, this writer explains how he thinks he can learn from billionaire…

Read more »

Investing Articles

A £1k investment in this FTSE 250 stock 10 years ago would be worth £17,242 today

Games Workshop shares have been a spectacularly good investment over the last 10 years. And Stephen Wright thinks there might…

Read more »

Asian man looking concerned while studying paperwork at his desk in an office
Investing Articles

10%+ yield! I’m eyeing this share for my SIPP in May

Christopher Ruane explains why an investment trust with a double-digit annual dividend yield is on his SIPP shopping list for…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Will the Rolls-Royce share price hit £2 or £6 first?

The Rolls-Royce share price has soared in recent years. Can it continue to gain altitude or could it hit unexpected…

Read more »

A senior man and his wife holding hands walking up a hill on a footpath looking away from the camera at the view. The fishing village of Polperro is behind them.
Investing Articles

How much should I put in stocks to give up work and live off passive income?

Here’s how much I’d invest and which stocks I’d target for a portfolio focused on passive income for an earlier…

Read more »

Google office headquarters
Investing Articles

Does a dividend really make Alphabet stock more attractive?

Google parent Alphabet announced this week it plans to pay its first ever dividend. Our writer gives his take on…

Read more »

Young mixed-race couple sat on the beach looking out over the sea
Investing Articles

Could starting a Stocks & Shares ISA be my single best financial move ever?

Christopher Ruane explains why he thinks setting up a seemingly mundane Stocks and Shares ISA could turn out to be…

Read more »

Investing Articles

How I’d invest £200 a month in UK shares to target £9,800 in passive income annually

Putting a couple of hundred of pounds each month into the stock market could generate an annual passive income close…

Read more »