The Hidden Nasty In Royal Mail PLC’s Latest Results

Roland Head takes a closer look at the latest figures from Royal Mail PLC (LON:RMG) — and uncovers a worrying trend.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

royal mail

The recent deal between Royal Mail (LSE: RMG) and the Communication Workers Union looks like it should solve most of Royal Mail’s industrial relations problems.

However, I recently took a closer look at the firm’s latest results, which confirmed my suspicions that the business has a bigger problem; one that could seriously affect its long-term growth prospects.

Volume vs price

Royal Mail’s letters business reported a 5% decline in volumes and a 3% decline in revenues during the first nine months of last year, but investors shrugged this off. After all, we all know that letters are history, and the new growth area is parcels from internet retailers, right?

Well, yes. According to the CAP Gemini e-retail sales index, the online retail market grew by 16% in 2013. You would probably expect Royal Mail to have picked up a slice of that action. But it didn’t.

That’s right — Royal Mail’s parcel volumes were flat during the first nine months of its current financial year, which included Christmas. Although Royal Mail reported an 8% increase in parcel revenues, this was simply the result of price rises and new, size-based, pricing.

Price hikes like this can’t be repeated very often, and although Royal Mail handles more parcels than anyone else, it’s losing market share to its competitors, who are reporting rising volumes.

Ignoring the internet?

One problem may be that Royal Mail’s exclusive contract with the Post Office means that it cannot sell its services anywhere else.

This means that it is shut out of the entire online parcel shipping market, and is excluded from the rapidly-growing parcel drop-off market, where couriers collect and deliver parcels to a network of drop-off points, such as the 5,000+ branch CollectPlus network run by Yodel.

Although Parcelforce Worldwide services are available online, Royal Mail’s parcel services are restricted to the Post Office, which also refuses to do business with online parcel services, forcing customers to visit its branch network if they want to send parcels.

I know what I think

As a regular user of both Royal Mail and courier services, I increasingly choose the online option and send via a courier.

For all but the smallest parcels, it’s just as cheap, and the convenience of booking online and having a collection from my home makes the tedium of lunchtime queuing in my town centre post office completely unnecessary. 

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

> Roland does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

2 mouthwatering FTSE growth stocks I’d buy and hold for 10 years

Growth stocks purchased today could be the gateway to many years of capital growth and returns. Here are two picks…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Can the IAG share price really be as dirt cheap as it looks?

While most shares have recovered since the Covid days, the IAG share price is staying stuck to rock bottom. Surely…

Read more »

Investing Articles

BAE Systems shares are flying! Have I missed the boat?

Sumayya Mansoor looks into whether or not BAE Systems shares are still a good buy for her portfolio after the…

Read more »

British flag, Big Ben, Houses of Parliament and British flag composition
Investing Articles

1 heavyweight FTSE 100 share I’d buy as London retakes its crown

Some Footsie firms are extremely large, but that doesn't mean they couldn't get even bigger. Here's one such FTSE 100…

Read more »

Investing Articles

I’d buy 5,127 National Grid shares to generate £250 of monthly passive income

With a dividend yield of 6.5%, Muhammad Cheema takes a look at how National Grid shares can generate a healthy…

Read more »

Investing Articles

The FTSE 100’s newest member looks like a no-brainer to me!

This Fool explains why she sees the newest member of the FTSE 100 as a great opportunity after its recent…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Empty Stocks and Shares ISA? Here’s how I’d start earning a second income from scratch

Like the thought of earning extra cash tax free? Our writer explains what he'd do to begin earning passive income…

Read more »

Happy young female stock-picker in a cafe
Investing Articles

No savings at 25? I’d start by investing £3k in these 3 red-hot FTSE 100 shares

Harvey Jones thinks these three FTSE 100 stocks would be a great way to kickstart a portfolio of UK shares.…

Read more »