The Hidden Nasty In AstraZeneca plc’s Latest Results

AstraZeneca plc (LON:AZN) is a fine company, but Roland Head has noticed a disturbing trend in the firm’s clinical trials that investors should be aware of.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US) is a firm that I rate highly, but I recently discovered a ‘hidden nasty’ in the firm’s operations, which I feel potential shareholders should be aware of.

In this case, the problem isn’t financial — indeed, Astra’s balance sheet, which has minimal debt and plenty of cash, looks much more attractive than GlaxoSmithKline‘s debt mountain.

However, Astra’s earnings keep falling, as key products lose patent protection without being replaced by new products. My hidden nasty suggests that Astra is going to have to do some serious spending if it is to overcome this challenge in the next couple of years.

Phase lag

When a pharmaceutical company develops a new medicine, it goes through three sets of trials — phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3.

The majority of phase 1 and 2 trials don’t result in products that make it through to production, so as investors, it makes sense to concentrate our attention on phase 3 trials, around three-quarters of which do result in commercial products.

I’ve taken a look at the latest published pipeline documents for both AstraZeneca and Glaxo, and I’ve noticed what I believe to be a significant difference.

Approximately 30% of Glaxo’s current clinical trials are in phase 3, compared to just 15% of Astra’s.

When you consider that even after a successful phase 3 trial, medicines require regulatory approval, and can take several more years to reach the market, you can see what a mountain AstraZeneca has to climb in order to replace core products such as Nexium and Seroquel IR.

The fact that such a small proportion of Astra’s trials are in late stages is worrying for future revenues, and to me, this suggests that Astra’s pipeline is lagging significantly behind that of Glaxo.

Worth the wait?

AstraZeneca currently trades on a forecast P/E of 11.7 and offers a prospective yield of 4.8%. I think that’s an appealing valuation, despite the fact that Astra’s earnings per share are expected to fall by a further 9% this year, placing it on a 2014 forecast P/E of 12.8.

As a long-standing Glaxo shareholder, I’m going to sit tight, but if I were starting afresh today, I would almost certainly choose to invest in AstraZeneca, thanks to its strong balance sheet and cheap valuation. Over the medium term, history suggests that these attributes will provide above-average returns.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

> Roland owns shares in GlaxoSmithKline but does not own shares in AstraZeneca. The Motley Fool has recommended shares in GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

3 FTSE 100 shares with ex-dividend dates next week!

Fancy grabbing some juicy dividends in the coming weeks? These FTSE 100 shares all go ex-dividend during the next seven…

Read more »

Young Woman Drives Car With Dog in Back Seat
Investing Articles

Can the Tesla share price beat September’s 22% climb in October?

All the techie attention seems to have drifted away from the Tesla share price at the moment. But October could…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Up 27% yesterday, but I think my favourite growth stock under $10 still has room to run

Our writer looks at why up-and-coming growth stock Joby Aviation (NYSE:JOBY) just exploded 27% higher on the New York Stock…

Read more »

Investing Articles

1 stock I’d love to buy from the FTSE 100 in October

I think this FTSE 100 business has great potential to perform well long term and the valuation looks attractive to…

Read more »

Investing Articles

If I’d put £1,000 in Lloyds shares 5 years ago, here’s what I’d have now

Lloyds shares are among the most closely watched on the FTSE 100. The stock might not have delivered for investors…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Top UK shares I’d consider buying for growing dividends

Some UK shares have been super-reliable when it comes to throwing cash back at investors. Paul Summers picks out some…

Read more »

Investing Articles

After a bumper first half gives the Tesco share price a boost, should I buy?

The Tesco share price is having a great year, and these first-half figures show us why. Here's how the stock…

Read more »

One English pound placed on a graph to represent an economic down turn
Investing Articles

Fear sends FTSE 100 stocks flashing red. But why are these two stocks winning?

The FTSE 100 continues to deliver a strong performance despite several stocks dipping earlier this week. Our writer looks at…

Read more »