Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc vs Unilever plc: Which Should You Buy?

Results today show Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc (LON: RB) is making progress. How does it compare to rival, Unilever plc (LON: ULVR)?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

reckitt.benckiserToday’s update from Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB) showed that the company is making progress with its goal of increasing revenue by 5% per annum. Indeed, it believes that the best way to achieve this is to de-merge its pharmaceuticals arm into a separate, standalone company so that Reckitt Benckiser can focus on improving sales of hygiene, health and consumer products. This seems to make sense, especially since the company has cautioned that the second half of the year could see demand weaken due to a tough climate in the US and certain emerging markets.

UnileverThis sentiment was echoed by rival Unilever (LSE: ULVR) (NYSE: UL.US), which said in its recent update that it is experiencing pricing pressure in developed countries and a general slowdown in demand in Asia. Despite this, shares have posted strong gains in 2014, being up 5% versus just 1% for the FTSE 100, although they are some way behind Reckitt Benckiser’s 9% increase during 2014. Looking ahead, which of the two companies is the better investment?

Growth Potential

Despite both companies reporting disappointing levels of demand in emerging markets, Reckitt Benckiser and Unilever both have vast potential when it comes to long-term sales growth. Indeed, on this front, Unilever could have the edge, since its products tend to be more luxurious and more discretionary than many of Reckitt Benckiser’s. This could allow Unilever to take advantage of increasing wealth levels and the rapid growth in the middle class in emerging markets to a greater extent than Reckitt Benckiser.

Even in the short term, Unilever’s forecast growth in earnings is higher than that of Reckitt Benckiser. For instance, while Unilever is set to report growth in earnings per share (EPS) of just 1% this year, the company is expected to bounce back next year with growth of 9%. Reckitt Benckiser, meanwhile, is forecast to deliver a reduction in earnings of 6% this year, followed by growth of 5% next year.

Valuations

As two companies with considerable long-term potential, as well as a stable of highly lucrative brands, Unilever and Reckitt Benckiser are unlikely to ever be cheap. Indeed, their current price to earnings (P/E) ratios are 20.2 (Reckitt Benckiser) and 20.3 (Unilever). Although marginally higher, Unilever seems to offer better value than its peer as a result of its higher forecast growth rate, but also because it pays a higher yield. While Reckitt Benckiser’s yield is just 2.6%, Unilever currently yields 3.4%, which is in-line with the market average.

Looking Ahead

Indeed, when it comes to which is the better buy, Unilever seems to edge out Reckitt Benckiser. That’s because, while its current valuation is slightly higher, it appears to offer superior short and long term growth prospects to its rival, as well as a higher yield. While both companies could have strong futures, Unilever could have the slightly brighter one for investors.

Peter Stephens has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Unilever.

More on Investing Articles

Businessman hand stacking up arrow on wooden block cubes
Investing Articles

Up 9% today, is this FTSE 250 share’s recovery gaining pace?

This FTSE 250 share has had a welcome boost in the market today after it unveiled an upbeat trading statement.…

Read more »

Lady wearing a head scarf looks over pages on company financials
Investing Articles

5 years ago Barclays shares cost just 181p! Are they still a buy at today’s 434p?

Harvey Jones says investors have to pay a lot more to buy Barclays shares than just a few years ago,…

Read more »

Tanker coming in to dock in calm waters and a clear sunset
Investing Articles

Up 36%, could Shell shares still offer value for the long term?

Christopher Ruane has owned Shell shares before -- and got burnt by a dividend cut. Could recent oil price rises…

Read more »

A young Asian woman holding up her index finger
Investing Articles

£5,000 invested in FTSE 100 stock London Stock Exchange Group 1 month ago is now worth…

FTSE 100 powerhouse London Stock Exchange Group has been dragged into the software sell-off. However, recently, it has started to…

Read more »

Two business people sitting at cafe working on new project using laptop. Young businesswoman taking notes and businessman working on laptop computer.
Investing Articles

The Barratt Redrow share price trades at a 13-year low! Is it a screaming buy at 266p?

The Barratt Redrow share price has taken a battering in recent years but Harvey Jones says the FTSE 100 stock…

Read more »

Finger clicking a button marked 'Buy' on a keyboard
Growth Shares

Why is everyone buying Rio Tinto shares?

Rio Tinto shares are the flavour of the week among investors. Paul Summers is asking whether this momentum will continue.

Read more »

A rear view of a female in a bright yellow coat walking along the historic street known as The Shambles in York, UK which is a popular tourist destination in this Yorkshire city.
Investing Articles

How much do you need in an ISA for £100 a day in passive income?

Ben McPoland explains why he thinks this cheap FTSE 250 stock could contribute nicely towards an ISA pumping out passive…

Read more »

Departure & Arrival sign, representing selling and buying in a portfolio
Investing Articles

Warning: hedge funds expect this FTSE stock to tank

This FTSE stock has already taken a huge hit due to the conflict in the Middle East. However, institutional investors…

Read more »