A Discount To Cash And Profitable

Published in Company Comment on 5 June 2009

A company operating in China under poor trading conditions may not seem like a great investment opportunity. But when it's valued at less than cash…

Any company valued at less than its cash holdings, with other assets and a tiny historic price-to-earnings ratio (PER) must be worth of consideration. Add to that a degree of excitement over future products, and you have to take it seriously.

But dig down a little under the surface of Taihua (LSE: TAIH), it's easy to see why its valuation has become so depressed. Trading has been difficult and anything operating in China isn't anywhere near as fashionable with investors as it was a couple of years ago. And they don't come much more Chinese than this Chinese traditional medicines and pharmaceuticals company.

The products

But if you're thinking it's all about mixed dried herbs and quack remedies, think again. Taihua manufacturers and supplies some very serious drugs indeed for the treatment of leukaemia and other cancers. Traditional and modern medicines largely rely on plant extracts for their key ingredients, although once identified these can often be replicated in the lab. However, preservation and further planting remains extremely important in order for new cures and drugs to be identified and developed. 

Taihua's main specialities are in producing paxlitaxel which is used in used in cancer chemotherapy and homoharringtonine which "could be of potential significant benefit for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia because it may act in a different way than the already authorised drugs" according to the European Medicines Agency.

These products are produced to very high levels of purity that meet Western standards. The company has secured continuous access to raw materials as a result of long term supply agreements with Chinese yew tree growers and is also developing its own yew tree nurseries and plantations.

Problems, problems

But things haven't been going so well.

First of all, the Chinese government banned the production of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) following a series of fake drug scandals across the country, which meant that Taihua's subsidiary, Taihua Natural Plant Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd was unable to continue with sales into its domestic market. TCM sales accounted for 20% of turnover in 2007.

Then a trading statement in February revealed that sales of its two main specialist drugs, paclitaxel and homoharringtonine were down 16% and 28% respectively. This was mainly due to tighter lending conditions which meant Taihua's customers couldn't secure the credit needed to buy the drugs. 

Its customers asked for credit from Taihua and more favourable terms, which increased the company's risk of recovery from some customers, so it turned some orders down from those it considered to be higher risk. Also, the introduction of a semi-synthetic paclitaxel by competitors hit sales of Taihua's all-natural version -- whilst foreign exchange rate fluctuations in Russia and South America impacted on sales there.

What's the attraction?

In short, it's the company's cash position and its potential for a recovery in earnings.

In 2007, Taihua's first full year since the company's admission to AIM in December 2006, it managed to bring in pre-tax profits of Renminbi (RMB) 39.8m (£2.6m) on a turnover of RMB 71.79m (£4.7m). This would put the shares today on a historic PER of just 3.8 at that time, or around 2.2 at today's exchange rates. This clearly isn't going to happen for 2008, but any kind of recovery to this sort of level over time would make the shares look ludicrously cheap.

Cash rich

Then there's the cash. At the interim stage to the end of June, Taihua had a net asset value of over RMB 123m (£11.2m) and cash of over RMB 82m (£7.5m) but at the current mid price of 7.12p, it is valued at less than £6m.

Taihua's final results for 2008 are due out on 26 June and, judging by the trading statement, they aren't going to be pretty. But this news is already in the price and then some. And although we learned that sales revenue and pre-tax profit are expected to be "significantly" below previous expectations, it doesn't sound like the company is expecting to lose money on their "annus horribilis" of 2008.

Meanwhile Taihua is waiting for a result from its application for a certificate of suitability for paclitaxel from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines. Approval here could see the shares significantly re-rated, but the cash position offers huge downside protection if not.

More from David Holding:

David owns shares in Taihua.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Proselenes 06 Jun 2009 , 2:34am

You fail to take into account many things, and the comment about European approval and "significant rerating" is utter nonsense IMO.

Firstly, margins are under pressure. Taihua produces in RMB and as you know the RMB is getting strong and stronger. They also sell in RMB and all basic selling prices are costed in RMB. Given the strength (and its going to get stronger) of the RMB they are now seriously struggling to compete with other producers on the export market. What they have done appears to be hold prices (US$) and suffer the drastic loss of margin when the sales are converted back to RMB.

Thats not the only pressure. Synthetics are proving very popular, just as efficient and cheaper to produce it seems. This means sales, and again margins are under severe pressure from synthetics.

I would strongly recommend looking into the synthetics issue, most Taihua holders avoid it like the plague and waffle on about Euro approval.

They have to upgrade their production plant and process in order to bring in efficiency gains that will help protect margins going forward, this will cost money and mean the cash pile will go on Capex, if and when they decide to do it.

And finally, European approval means nothing on its own. All it means is that they can, at that time, attempt to go through the demanding and costly process of setting up distribution and sales networks and attempt to sell their more costly (RMB strength) stuff into a market that has plenty of suppliers already and where price is key.

Taihua could get European approval and then never sell anything in Europe. Anyone who attempts to play the "Euro approval = rerating" is simply saying that on a similar basis if Taihua buys a Euro Lottery ticket they will rerate as they might win 10 million on it.

Approval is one thing, selling into it is totally different. And if Taihua is already struggling in the Asian export markets due to the strength of the RMB and competition from synthetics, why on earth do you think they can be "super successful" in selling into Europe.

miranda99 06 Jun 2009 , 9:24am

Proslenes

I was enjoying your post until the last a line when you posted David said Taihua would be 'super successful' if selling into Europe. What David actually wrote was

"Approval here could see the shares significantly re-rated"

The word "could" is italicised for emphasis.

Why have you put words into the author's mouth? If you were were writing for a newspaper you could probably be sued for libel. Unfortunately your entire post has been rendered worthless since your credibility is shot. Accuracy is important, doubly so when you are implying a direct quote from someone.

Proselenes 06 Jun 2009 , 4:19pm

LOL....Errrr... you say accuracy is important. Take a long hard look in the mirror.

My post says "can be" which is the same as "could be" as I am asking why he "thinks they can be"

You say "would be" not me. I think you are trying to make up problems to suit your desires. Why have you said I said "would be" when in fact I used the same terms as David, he said "could be" and I said "why on earth do you think they can be "super successful" in selling into Europe."


Please do not try to confuse people with blatent lies.

I said, and its above, and it is not possible to edit........ "CAN BE" not as you try to suggest "would be".


ACCURACY IS IMPORTANT - trying being accurate.

miranda99 06 Jun 2009 , 4:40pm

I'll ask you again. Why did you imply David said Taihua can be "super successful" selling in Europe. Thats a blatant lie.

gmac111 08 Jun 2009 , 2:11pm

Admit when you're wrong Proselenes. It's an endearing quality!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.