BP made the far-reaching decision to increase its debt but continue paying a dividend to shareholders. Shell opted to cut its dividend by 66% to avoid the burden of further debt.
This was a major decision by Shell and unexpected by many, myself included. Shell had enjoyed a perfect dividend-paying record for over 70 years!
Are the days of ‘Big Oil’ investment numbered?
With so much negativity already stacking up against the oil industry, the coronavirus pandemic and geopolitics have landed it in a precarious position. Environmental issues are of mounting concern, demand has come to a standstill, and storage options are running out.
Saudi Arabia and Russia began escalating their oil price war in March, kicking off the historical price slide. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions are running high between the US and Iran.
The pandemic has caused oil demand to halt, but this is an unnatural and unexpected pause in an otherwise demand-driven industry.
Storage is a whole other matter. Where does the world store the millions of excess barrels of oil it has pumped out of the ground? Storage options are few and their scarcity has driven storage costs through the roof.
I don’t know which company made the most sensible decision for the long term. For shareholders, dividends were the principal attraction to oil companies. BP and Shell also feature highly in equity income funds, precisely for this reason.
Without dividends, you’re left investing in a company that’s increasingly unfavourable in its global position.
For this reason, I think Shell will hurt from cancelling its dividend. However, if it pays down its debt and comes through the oil downturn positively, oil demand will return, and it can reinstate its dividend with confidence.
The BP dividend gamble
BP has possibly made the right decision for now. There are so many companies slashing dividends that income investors are running out of options. This could make BP attractive to some. However, saddling a company with even more debt when the outlook for the oil industry is so poor, is risky.
Perhaps its thought process hinges on the fact interest rates are so low just now. Taking a loan could prove a better gamble than alienating shareholders. All very well if the oil price regains previous highs, and production can be ramped up again. Neither of which is certain.
I think the demand for oil will increase again, but not in the near term. There is the surplus to get through first and in doing so, companies must restructure and streamline. There will no doubt be buyouts, bailouts, and bankruptcies along the way.
I still think both BP and Shell will survive, but they could be quite different versions of themselves come time.
If I were buying shares in either of them today, I would opt for BP. It seems to have a forward-thinking CEO; it takes investors’ interests into account and I think its firm stance on renewables will stand it in good stead going forward. If it can get through the production cuts, then I think its share price will recover the quickest.
According to one leading industry firm, the 5G boom could create a global industry worth US $12.3 TRILLION out of thin air…
And if you click here, we’ll show you something that could be key to unlocking 5G’s full potential...
It’s just ONE innovation from a little-known US company that has quietly spent years preparing for this exact moment…
But you need to get in before the crowd catches onto this ‘sleeping giant’.
Kirsteen has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.