Want to build wealth? Investing beats playing the National Lottery

James J. McCombie demonstrates with simulations that investing, rather than playing the National Lottery, is far likelier to leave you with real wealth.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

The chances of winning big on the lottery are slim, and every ticket is likely to return much less than you paid for it.  But would you really be better off investing rather than buying lottery tickets? Sometimes a simulation can be illuminating, even when the answer seems obvious.

What we will do is assume that we either invest £26 a month for 25 years in a fund or spend it on lottery tickets. I chose £26 a month because it’s an amount just above the minimum regular contribution threshold for a few ISAs, and spending this amount on the lottery does not sound outlandish. Plus 25 years might be the period over which someone saves for retirement.

Let’s play the (simulated) lottery

Using numbers drawn from the National Lottery website, matching five numbers and the bonus ball pays £1,000,000 on average, matching five numbers gets you £1,750, four wins £140, three pays £30, and two nets you just £2. Matching all six numbers will pay an average jackpot of £5,000,000.

I randomly generated 300 lottery results and 13 lucky dip ticket numbers for each draw to simulate 25 years of monthly play, for which the player would be £7,800 down if they won nothing. This was done 1,000 times, so we have a range of simulated winnings (or losses). None of these players would have been celebrating.

Demonstrate simulated results from playing the lottery for 25 years

Our lottery players lost £5,105 on average, with £5,846 being the worst loss recorded and being £2,838 down the best performance. No life-changing amounts were won.

Smart investors?

What we will simulate investing in is the iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility ETF offered by Blackrock. This will track the performance of a European, large-cap equities benchmark, and returns 0.78% per month on average after fees, with a standard deviation of 2.76%.

How did our 1000 investors do? They invested £26 every month for 25 years and received a monthly return (randomly generated from a normal distribution based on our fund’s monthly mean return and standard deviation) on whatever they had invested at the time. They did much better than the lottery players.

demonstrate expected wealth investing 25 pounds a month into a fund

The simulated investors ended up with £30,390 on average with one lucky investor walking away with £105,842. Even the worst performance of £9,664 was far better than the luckiest lottery player and beats stuffing £26 a month under the mattress.

The winning ticket

Past performance is not a guide to future performance, and yes, the fund results are based on historical numbers and investing is not without risk. If I had simulated 10,000 or 100,000 lottery players we may have had a jackpot winner, and maybe the average winnings do not represent the true range of prizes given now or in the future.

But I think the assumptions are reasonable, and the difference in fortunes is so stark that we can say with confidence that wealth is more likely to be built by investing in this single fund (and do not forget the many others that are out there) compared with playing the lottery. Of course, in the real world, a portfolio should be appropriately diversified and reflect the investor’s risk and return preferences.

If someone enjoyed playing the lottery, perhaps for the chance to dream about winning, I would not say they must stop. But I would suggest that they invest what they can afford first, and then buy lottery tickets.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

James J. McCombie has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Passive income text with pin graph chart on business table
Investing Articles

Yields of up to 7%! I’d consider boosting my income with these FTSE dividend stocks

The London market has some decent-looking dividend stocks right now, and I’m tempted by these two for growing income streams.

Read more »

Young mixed-race couple sat on the beach looking out over the sea
Investing Articles

I’d put £20K in an ISA now to target a £1,900 monthly second income in future!

Christopher Ruane shares why he thinks a long-term approach to investing and careful selection of shares could help him build…

Read more »

Mature couple at the beach
Investing Articles

6 stocks that Fools have been buying!

Our Foolish freelancers are putting their money where their mouths are and buying these stocks in recent weeks.

Read more »

Black woman using loudspeaker to be heard
Investing Articles

I was right about the Barclays share price! Here’s what I think happens next

Jon Smith explains why he still feels the Barclays share price is undervalued and flags up why updates on its…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Where I’d start investing £8,000 in April 2024

Writer Ben McPoland highlights two areas of the stock market that he would target if he were to start investing…

Read more »

View of Tower Bridge in Autumn
Investing Articles

Ahead of the ISA deadline, here are 3 FTSE 100 stocks I’d consider

Jon Smith notes down some FTSE 100 stocks in sectors ranging from property to retail that he thinks could offer…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

Why I think Rolls-Royce shares will pay a dividend in 2024

Stephen Wright thinks Rolls-Royce shares are about to pay a dividend again. But he isn’t convinced this is something investors…

Read more »

Investing Articles

1 of the best UK shares to consider buying in April

Higher gold prices and a falling share price have put this FTSE 250 stock on Stephen Wright's list of UK…

Read more »