Is Neil Woodford-backed Allied Minds plc a falling knife to catch after dropping 15% today?

Is a costly restructuring plan a reason to buy shares of Allied Minds plc (LON: ALM)?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

Shares of life sciences and technology incubator Allied Minds (LSE: ALM) are down over 15% in early trading after it announced it was cutting funding to seven of the 21 start-ups it has provided funding to. This will be a costly process for the company, which is 28% owned by Neil Woodford, and will result in a $146m writedown to the firm’s adjusted value.

But does this represent a stellar opportunity for investors to begin a position?

The bullish case

Cutting ties to a full third of the businesses it supports wasn’t an easy or, judging by the market reaction, popular decision to make. Yet, there is reason to be optimistic as it shows incoming CEO Jill Smith is taking to heart her remit to concentrate on commercialising the business lines with the most potential.

It was clearly time that the company shifted its focus to commercialisation as to date it has invested over $239m into portfolio businesses yet realised only $1.3m in revenue in H1 2016.

The bearish case

Allied Minds has sold itself to investors as a smart way to go through potential start-ups to find businesses that are worth investing in. But today’s admission that sevrn of these businesses aren’t panning out does not engender much confidence that the business plan is working.

With a huge write-off on the way, actual sales close to nil and a constant need to tap shareholders for further cash, would-be investors have plenty of reason to be wary. Investing in start-ups is exciting but Allied Minds’ plunging share price shows just how volatile a business model it is. Neil Woodford’s backing lends a great deal of credence to the company’s claims but it is simply too opaque and risky an investment for me.

A profitable path forward?

But not all funds looking to commercialise intellectual property fail to pan out completely. Another of Woodford’s big bets is on Touchstone Innovations (LSE: IVO), the company formerly known as Imperial Innovations, in which his funds hold a 23% stake.

While the firm’s shares are down around 33% from their 2015 peak it has at least shown it can successfully back and profit from its investments over a long period of time.

Two of its portfolio companies have recently signed licensing agreements with major pharma players Takeda and Bristol-Myers Squibb that could total $790m and $936m over time. These eye-wateringly high payments are far from assured as they’re based on reaching ambitious development, clinical, regulatory and sales milestones over many, many years. But the agreements are still a step in the right direction.

But the risks of this business model don’t end once a product is commercialised. For evidence of this we have to look no further than Touchstone’s spin-off, Circassia Pharmaceuticals, which it still owns a 9.3% stake in. Shares of the popular biotech firm plunged by two-thirds in June after its flagship cat allergy treatments turned out to be no more effective than a placebo in clinical trials.

What does this mean for potential investors? Small-scale tech and pharma firms are risky and even experts in these fields have a tough time picking long-term winners. That shares of Touchstone are sitting below their 2006 IPO price despite successful spin-offs tells me all I need to know about why small shareholders should avoid this volatile and opaque sector.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Ian Pierce has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Young Asian woman holding a cup of takeaway coffee and folders containing paperwork, on her way into the office
Investing Articles

How I could make a 10% yield for high passive income a reality

Jon Smith explains how he can target high passive income from top-yielding stocks, including one specific example he'd consider.

Read more »

Investing Articles

I’d buy 1,784 shares of this FTSE 100 stock to target £350 of monthly passive income

Muhammad Cheema takes a look at how British American Tobacco shares, with a dividend yield of 10.1%, can generate a…

Read more »

White female supervisor working at an oil rig
Investing Articles

1 ex-FTSE 100 stock that I think will get promoted soon

Jon Smith flags up an energy stock that used to be in the FTSE 100 and currently has strong momentum…

Read more »

Shot of a young Black woman doing some paperwork in a modern office
Investing Articles

With an 8% dividend yield, I think this undervalued FTSE stock is a no-brainer buy

With an impressive yield and good track record of payments, Mark David Hartley is considering adding this promising FTSE share…

Read more »

Passive income text with pin graph chart on business table
Investing Articles

£9,500 in savings? Here’s how I’d try to turn that into £1,809 a month of passive income

Investing a relatively small amount into high-yielding stocks and reinvesting the dividends paid can generate significant passive income over time.

Read more »

Businesswoman analyses profitability of working company with digital virtual screen
Investing Articles

Dividend star Legal & General’s share price is still marked down, so should I buy more?

Legal & General’s share price looks very undervalued against its peers. But it pays an 8%+ dividend yield, and has…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Dividend shares: 1 FTSE 100 stock to consider buying for chunky shareholder income

This company’s ‘clean’ dividend record looks attractive to me and I’d consider buying some of the shares to hold long…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 of my top FTSE 250 stocks to consider buying before April

Buying undervalued UK shares can be a great way to generate long-term wealth. Here, Royston Wild reveals a handful on…

Read more »