Trading Losses At Credit Suisse AG: A Warning Shot For All Investors!

A warning shot across the bow for investors as Credit Suisse AG (NYSE:CS) reports more losses on bond holdings.

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

While investors have spent much of the recent few quarters looking toward commodities as a source of risk, a new saga has been opening. One that all investors should at least be aware of. The second chapter of this saga was concluded this week.

In an addendum to February’s 2015 results Credit Suisse (NYSE: CS) explained to investors that, among other things, it would be accelerating the pace of its restructuring and further downsizing its Global Markets business. This was after a series of bad bets on junk bonds and complex derivatives pushed the bank into the red.

Soured trading positions cost Credit Suisse $633m in the fourth quarter after spreads widened and client activity fell off the edge of a cliff. They also cost it a further $346m in the first quarter, prompting management to exit some parts of the market and reduce scale in others.

It remains an open question as to how soon the bank will be able to walk away from some of these lines of business given that the current illiquid condition of the underlying assets has been a major driver of the above trading losses.

The elephant in the room

The source of Credit Suisse’s trading woes are largely the result of conditions at the lower rated end of the bond market.

Many will remember how the financial world shuddered in late 2015 as a deteriorating junk bond market, which was mostly the result of Fed tightening, forced a small number of US mutual funds to suspend client withdrawals in a series of events that almost echoed those of 2008.    

The problem today is that these conditions have not eased so far into the new year. Spreads are still prohibitively wide and uncertainty pervades.

Moreover, Bloomberg recently reported that 40% of US junk bonds didn’t trade, or change hands at all, in the first two months of the year. This is while most high yield corporate bond indices have fallen to 2009 lows, surpassing levels last experienced during the taper tantrum of 2013 and the European debt crisis.

Casualties and other implications

This article isn’t meant to be a prediction of pending doom or anything close to it. After all, the Fed now appears to be taking a slower path toward a tighter policy environment, while the shift to negative rates in Japan and the increasing scale of the ECB’s intervention may also mean that a certain level of ‘reaching for yield’ continues regardless of what happens in the US.

However, it does not take a rocket scientist to see the potential for casualties on both sides of the market in the coming quarters. Some investors are clearly concerned about the implications of tighter policy in the US and economic conditions elsewhere in the developed world, while there remains a large universe of highly leveraged companies out there, many of whom depend upon access to capital markets for survival.

If the current environment persists then there are going to be further implications for investor confidence in the ability of these companies to service and eventually repay their debts. Such concerns may even spread to encompass some of the more highly rated, but similarly geared issuers.

Other banks with large fixed income operations, like Barclays, could suffer from trading losses if the market does not improve, while some of the lower rated issuers could face insolvency if the market deteriorates further and they are deprived of access to funding.

One thing that seems almost certain is that, as private investors, it is probably time to rethink expectations for returns from the banking sector and to steer clear of highly geared companies. Particularly those at the lower end of the ratings spectrum.

 

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

James Skinner has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Happy parents playing with little kids riding in box
Investing Articles

A 9.7%-yielding FTSE 100 dividend gem that could create generational wealth

A sizeable investment pot that can be passed onto the next generation could be built with much smaller investments over…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Up 31%, do Lloyds shares have more to give?

Shares in major FTSE 100 bank Lloyds are on a charge. But what could be in store for the stock?…

Read more »

Three signposts pointing in different directions, with 'Buy' 'Sell' and 'Hold' on
Investing Articles

Time to sell this FTSE 100 underperformer, says Goldman Sachs

Analysts at one investment bank have a ‘sell’ rating on FTSE 100 stock Diageo. But could a short-term weakness in…

Read more »

Arrow symbol glowing amid black arrow symbols on black background.
Investing Articles

Down 5%, Glencore’s share price looks a serious bargain to me now

Glencore’s share price looks undervalued to me, supported by strong earnings growth prospects and the potential resumption of extra shareholder…

Read more »

Young brown woman delighted with what she sees on her screen
Investing Articles

I’d invest £6,580 in this FTSE 250 REIT for £500 passive income

This FTSE 250 renewable energy enterprise is on track to become a Dividend Aristocrat! Here’s how I’d invest to earn…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Buying 1,000 of some dividend shares today unlocks £45 in weekly passive income!

These shares are among the biggest dividend payers in the FTSE 100. Should investors be buying them now to earn…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

If I’d put £5k in index funds 5 years ago, here’s what I’d have now

Investing in index funds is an excellent way to grow wealth with minimal effort. But how much money can investors…

Read more »

Investing Articles

10.2% yield! 1 of the top income stocks to buy in July?

A 10% yield's pretty rare, but this firm's been growing shareholder payouts for nine years! Does that make it one…

Read more »