This page is quite old hence its rather spartan appearance.
Why not check out our Latest Stories page for our newest articles or search our site for anything.
VALUE INVESTING
By
This is the latest regular two-monthly review of my high yield portfolios (HYP). The first, HYP1, is now about two and a half years old while the newcomer, HYP2, is just a couple of months old. The FTSE100 index has risen 9% since the last review at the end of March 2003. I stress that the primary aim is growth of income not capital, although some people do use the concept as a growth vehicle by reinvesting dividends which, in my view, is an excellent idea. Note that these are merely demonstration portfolios to illustrate a high yield approach that is characterised by no dabbling over long periods. They are not a recommended set of shares, nor would I necessarily choose the same portfolios today. It is worthwhile emphasising the highly attractive tax situation of dividend income compared with other types such as interest, rents or pension annuities. Dividends are tax free to a basic rate or lower rate taxpayer and liable to tax at only 25% on a higher rate payer. Here are the latest figures. Cost includes all purchase expenses.HYP1 start date 13 November 2000
£ orig. no. price val move
invest price shs. now now %
Un. Util. (LSE: UU.) 5000 690 718 620 4452 -11.0
Gallaher (LSE: GLH) 5000 416 1190 614 7306 +46.1
Scot. & New. (LSE: SCTN) 5000 490 1010 386 3899 -22.0
Royal & Sun (LSE: RSA) 5000 498 994 137 1362 –72.8
All. & Leic. (LSE: AL.) 5000 645 768 840 6451 +29.0
Britannic (LSE: BRT) 5000 1020 485 212 1028 –79.4
Lloyds TSB (LSE: LLOY) 5000 705 702 446 3131 -37.4
Intercon. Hotel (LSE: IHG) 1 2500 365 685 448 3068 +22.7
Mitchells & But (LSE: MAB) 1 2500 356 702 207 1453 -41.9
Boots (LSE: BOOT) 5000 575 861 628 5407 +8.1
Land Sec. (LSE: LAND) 2 5000 771 651 798 5195 +3.9
Ass. Br. Ports (LSE: ABP) 5000 321 1542 383 5906 +18.1
Hilton (LSE: HG.) 3 5000 232 2275 173 3936 -21.3
Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) 5000 1120 442 1216 5375 +7.5
Anglo American (LSE: AAL) 5000 942 526 952 5008 +0.2
Shell (LSE: SHEL) 5000 572 865 408 3529 -29.4
Totals 75000 66506 -11.3
FTSE100 6274.8 4071.9 -35.1
Income Yield on capital invested
Year ended 13/11/01 £3,451 4.6%
13/11/02 £3,474 4.6%
Notes
1 Intercontinental Hotels and Mitchells & Butlers were acquired as a result of the
division of the former Six Continents holding into these two new shares.
2 Land Securities reorganised in September 2002 resulting in a cash payment which
was used to purchase additional shares in the company.
3 Hilton replaced Blue Circle which was taken over for cash at a profit over the
£5,000 cost, the whole of the proceeds being reinvested. This is why the total
original cost of Hilton derived from the above table is more than £5,000. The
start investment of £5,000 has though been retained here so as to maintain the
original cost of the portfolio at its true figure of £75,000.HYP2 start date 02 April 2003
£ orig. no. price val move
invest price shs. now now %
Lloyds TSB (LSE: LLOY) 5000 338 1479 446 6596 +31.9
Scot. & New. (LSE: SCTN) 5000 348 1436 386 5543 +10.9
Dixons (LSE: DXNS) 5000 87 5762 113 6512 +30.2
Un. Util. (LSE: UU.) 5000 614 814 620 5047 +0.9
Hays (LSE: HAS) 5000 78 6435 84 5405 +8.1
Legal & Gen. (LSE: LGEN) 5000 75 6696 86 5759 +15.2
BA Tobacco (LSE: BATS) 5000 580 862 662 5706 +14.1
Brad. & Bing. (LSE: BB.) 5000 297 1685 350 5898 +18.0
Hanson (LSE: HNS) 5000 320 1563 346 5408 +8.2
Land Sec. (LSE: LAND) 5000 736 680 798 5426 +8.6
The BOC Group (LSE: BOC) 5000 795 628 778 4886 -2.3
BAA (LSE: BAA) 5000 465 1075 503 5407 +8.1
Shell (LSE: SHEL) 5000 394 1271 408 5186 +3.7
AMVESCAP (LSE: AVZ) 5000 311 1609 349 5615 +12.3
Anglo American (LSE: AAL) 5000 970 516 952 4912 -1.8
Totals 75000 83306 +11.1
FTSE100 3753.4 4071.9 +8.5
The initial forecast yield on HYP2 is expected to be around 6%, historically a very high figure for an equity portfolio and enormously attractive for that reason. Launching as it did at around a low point in the market over the last few years, I have great hopes for this portfolio in the long run. It has already got off to a cracking start in its very short history, leading the index by a decent margin whilst securing an income that it is way in excess of the market.
Even after only a couple of months, the typical diversified portfolio phenomenon of large individual share fluctuations has already asserted itself with Lloyds and Dixons gaining over 30% whilst the two losers are down 2%. Notice the powerhouse of the financials with Lloyds, Bradford & Bingley, Legal & General and AMVESCAP amongst the strongest performers, all beating the market by a large margin. This is classical market recovery behaviour. Financials are amongst the most volatile shares in major market moves, falling much further on the way down then reversing this trend on the way up.
HYP1 is down 11% but remains miles ahead of the market. Its performance is even better with income accumulated since its yield is much higher than the market. In fact with dividends reinvested it is almost break even by now. Still worse than cash of course but leaving trackers nowhere and beating almost all equity income funds. I'm satisfied with it for these reasons.
The familiar pattern of large individual movements continues. So we have our same two dogs, Royal & Sun and Britannic which, although having risen handsomely in recent months, remain down 70-80% whilst the top gainers are Gallaher and Alliance & Leicester, up 46% and 29% respectively.
It will be very interesting to compare the progress of HYPs 1 and 2 because they were launched at what seems to be, with hindsight, around a market top and bottom respectively. Many people have asked about timing HYPs but I have always claimed that the right time is now. Now yesterday, now now and now tomorrow. In other words when you have the cash available and you are convinced this is the strategy for you, you should go in at that point. It's not for waverers though, you have to remain with it for ten, twenty years, keep the faith and ignore all market comment. Despite good evidence that a high yield approach works over the long-term, there are no guarantees and there may be periods of market underperformance.
I believe this strategy will leave trackers behind. The early evidence, though too soon to draw any long-term conclusions, is highly encouraging. Given the lack of investor involvement required, indeed advised, and the similar long-term timescales, this makes HYPs eminently suitable alternatives for those considering tracker funds in my opinion.
The author holds Lloyds and Royal & Sun shares.