This page is quite old hence its rather spartan appearance.
Why not check out our Latest Stories page for our newest articles or search our site for anything.
VALUE INVESTING
By
___________________________________ Stephen Bland on Value Investing The Motley Fool and Stephen Bland (TMF Pyad) have combined with Incademy Training to offer a specialist course for value investors called, Stephen Bland on Value Investing. Over an extended period of time, Stephen has proven himself to be an incredibly successful private investor. Now you can spend over 6 hours with Stephen face-to-face, learning the techniques of successful value investing. Seminar places are strictly limited. To book your place on the Stephen Bland on Value Investing seminar, to be held in London on Friday April 19th 2002, click here. ____________________________________________ It's time for another review of my high yield portfolio (HYP) which I carry out every two months or so. I started it in November 2000 so this article brings us up to date some sixteen months from inception. For new readers, I stress that the primary aim of the portfolio is growth of income not capital, although some people do use the concept as a growth vehicle by reinvesting dividends. It was designed essentially for income investors, to be held forever with no dabbling, and aims to deliver a decent initial yield around twice that of the FTSE100 index and crucially, inflation beating income growth over the long term for investors prepared to take the risks of investing in equities for income. I believe that capital growth will go hand in hand with income growth, but as I say that is a secondary motive for this particular portfolio. Here are the latest figures. The start date was 13 November 2000 and the cost includes all purchase expenses. *Hilton replaced Blue Circle which was taken over for cash at a profit over the £5,000 cost, the whole of the proceeds being reinvested. This is why the total original cost of Hilton derived from the above table is more than £5,000. The start investment of £5,000 has though been retained here so as maintain the original cost of the portfolio at its true figure of £75,000, which has to be done in order to facilitate accurate measurement of capital value fluctuations. The income in the first year to November 2001 was £3,451 representing an actual yield on the £75,000 invested of 4.6%. The forthcoming year to November 2002 will be a baptism of fire for the second year of this HYP because two companies so far announced, Royal and Britannic, will be cutting their dividends. The big question is whether the increases on those holdings that do raise their dividends will compensate for the cuts, in order to produce the desired inflation beating rise over the first year figure shown above. It is too far away yet to predict anything. Note that the forecast start yield for an investor buying this portfolio now is 4.6%. This is a fall over the initial forecast of 4.8% back in November 2000 primarily due to the rise in the capital value of most of the HYP shares. That rise in a lot of cases has outstripped the dividend increases thus lowering yields on many of the constituents. Similarly, dividend cuts can lower a yield if the share price falls by proportionally more but here, rises are the main cause of the overall lower yield. Even 4.6% though is way over the index yield and more than most bank deposits. The capital performance of the portfolio continues to be very satisfactory compared with the index, actually showing a small profit against a sizeable fall by the latter, though I do stress that because this is meant to be held forever, the movement over the short period to date does not mean too much. It will only become meaningful over, say, ten years. There continues to be massive individual swings in capital performance ranging from a fall of about 40% by Royal to a rise of about 38% by Alliance & Leicester. Nobody should be alarmed or surpised by this. It is typical of a sector diversified portfolio and in fact illustrates why such diversification is critical for security reasons. Expect such differences in individual holding values to continue for all time, though not the same ones. In total there are eleven rises and four falls. The two largest falls, unsurprisingly, are the dividend cutters Royal and Britannic. My suggested approach to the whole strategy, which I designed for the hands-off investor, is simply to forget about it once invested, don't follow the shares, don't listen to any comment, just enjoy the income. Perhaps take a peek at it once every decade or so if you feel you have to get involved in some way. More: High Yield Portfolio discussion board Learn more about High Yield Investing at the Stephen Bland on Value Investing seminar. Hurry as places are filling fast. Don't delay - click here to reserve your place. £ orig. no. price val move forec
invest price shs. now now % yield Un. Util (LSE: UU.) 5000 690 718 612 4394 -12.1 7.8
Gallaher (LSE: GLH) 5000 416 1190 564 6712 +34.2 4.9
Scot. & New. (LSE: SCTN) 5000 490 1010 560 5656 +13.1 5.4
Royal & Sun (LSE: RSA) 5000 498 994 301 2992 –40.2 5.4
All. & Leic. (LSE: AL.) 5000 645 768 898 6897 +37.9 4.5
Britannic (LSE: BRT) 5000 1020 485 727 3526 –29.5 5.2
Lloyds TSB (LSE: LLOY) 5000 705 702 718 5040 +0.8 5.2
Six Continents (LSE: SXC) 5000 723 685 740 5069 +1.4 4.9
Boots (LSE: BOOT) 5000 575 861 670 5769 +15.4 4.3
Land Sec. (LSE: LAND) 5000 771 642 897 5759 +15.2 4.0
Ass. Br. Ports (LSE: ABP) 5000 321 1542 445 6862 +37.2 3.4
Hilton (LSE: HG.) * 5000 232 2275 245 5574 +11.5 3.9
Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) 5000 1120 442 1388 6135 +22.7 3.2
Anglo American (LSE: AAL) 5000 942 526 1176 6186 +23.7 3.2
Shell (LSE: SHEL) 5000 572 865 506 4377 -12.5 3.0
Totals 75000 80948 +7.9 4.6
FTSE 6274.8 5209.5 -17.0