function frameBuster() { if (top.frames.length > 1) { top.location.href = location.href; } }
|
|
|
|
STOCK IDEAS
By
When I first started investing, a friend who was already in the business advised me to "Just go read all of Warren Buffett's shareholder letters. That's all you'll need to know." I think he was pretty much right. That's not to denigrate the contributions to investment literature of Graham and Dodd, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and others, but I firmly believe that if one read, understood, and followed Buffett's teachings -- and had the three T's of time, training, and temperament -- investment success would be virtually guaranteed. (Read Richard McCaffery's September column, "Watching Warren Buffett," for further discussion of this concept.) Best of all, Buffett's letters dating back to 1977 are available for free on the website of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A), which he runs. (I also recommend The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate America as a more organized, efficient way to read them.) There's a lot of reading in those 24 letters, so I'd like to share my favorite quotes from them. In my opinion, these are among the wisest words ever written on investing. The keys to investment success "Your goal as an investor should simply be to purchase, at a rational price, a part interest in an easily understandable business whose earnings are virtually certain to be materially higher 5, 10, and 20 years from now. Over time, you will find only a few companies that meet these standards -- so when you see one that qualifies, you should buy a meaningful amount of stock. You must also resist the temptation to stray from your guidelines: If you aren't willing to own a stock for 10 years, don't even think about owning it for 10 minutes. Put together a portfolio of companies whose aggregate earnings march upward over the years, and so also will the portfolio's market value." Ignore macroeconomic factors "We purchased National Indemnity in 1967, See's in 1972, Buffalo News in 1977, Nebraska Furniture Mart in 1983, and Scott Fetzer in 1986 because those are the years they became available and because we thought the prices they carried were acceptable. In each case, we pondered what the business was likely to do, not what the Dow, the Fed, or the economy might do. If we see this approach as making sense in the purchase of businesses in their entirety, why should we change tack when we are purchasing small pieces of wonderful businesses in the stock market?" "We will continue to ignore political and economic forecasts, which are an expensive distraction for many investors and businessmen. Thirty years ago, no one could have foreseen the huge expansion of the Vietnam War, wage and price controls, two oil shocks, the resignation of a president, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, a one-day drop in the Dow of 508 points, or treasury bill yields fluctuating between 2.8% and 17.4%. "But, surprise: None of these blockbuster events made the slightest dent in Ben Graham's investment principles. Nor did they render unsound the negotiated purchases of fine businesses at sensible prices. Imagine the cost to us, then, if we had let a fear of unknowns cause us to defer or alter the deployment of capital. Indeed, we have usually made our best purchases when apprehensions about some macro event were at a peak... "A different set of major shocks is sure to occur in the next 30 years. We will neither try to predict these nor to profit from them. If we can identify businesses similar to those we have purchased in the past, external surprises will have little effect on our long-term results." Keep it simple! "Investors should remember that their scorecard is not computed using Olympic-diving methods: Degree-of-difficulty doesn't count. If you are right about a business whose value is largely dependent on a single key factor that is both easy to understand and enduring, the payoff is the same as if you had correctly analyzed an investment alternative characterized by many constantly shifting and complex variables." Argument for buying great businesses Welcome market declines "Identical reasoning guides our thinking about Berkshire's investments. We will be buying businesses -- or small parts of businesses, called stocks -- year in, year out as long as I live (and longer, if Berkshire's directors attend the seances I have scheduled). Given these intentions, declining prices for businesses benefit us, and rising prices hurt us. "The most common cause of low prices is pessimism -- some times pervasive, some times specific to a company or industry. We want to do business in such an environment, not because we like pessimism but because we like the prices it produces. It's optimism that is the enemy of the rational buyer. "None of this means, however, that a business or stock is an intelligent purchase simply because it is unpopular; a contrarian approach is just as foolish as a follow-the-crowd strategy. What's required is thinking rather than polling. Unfortunately, Bertrand Russell's observation about life in general applies with unusual force in the financial world: 'Most men would rather die than think. Many do.'" Don't confuse growth with sustainable competitive advantage (OK, so I cheated and included a quote that's not from one of Buffett's shareholder letters. Mea culpa.) -- Whitney Tilson Guest columnist Whitney Tilson is Managing Partner of Tilson Capital Partners, LLC, a New York City-based money management firm. He owned shares of Berkshire Hathaway at press time. Mr. Tilson appreciates your feedback at Tilson@Tilsonfunds.com. To read his previous columns for The Motley Fool and other writings, visit http://www.tilsonfunds.com/ |
|
|||||||
| USEQEQWEBE12 1124 ms |