This page is quite old hence its rather spartan appearance.
Why not check out our Latest Stories page for our newest articles or search our site for anything.
QUALIPORT
By
Rochester, Kent – If you invest in individual shares, then making big and bold investments is the only way to consistently beat the stock market over the long-term. The point was highlighted in the latest Duelling Fools feature, a duel that debated the subject: "Can Fools Beat the Market?" TMFNigel, presenting the "Yes, they can!" argument, ventured the following: "It's hard to find good companies trading at a bargain price, or great companies trading at a reasonable price. So when you find an attractive situation where you are highly confident of a favourable outcome, you should invest a meaningful amount. If you are confident of your investments then why hold any more than 10 individual investments at any one time? If you are REALLY confident then why hold any more than 5 investments?" The evidence that a focused approach is required for a market-beating portfolio is compelling. Take three market-beating investors known to most Fools – Warren Buffett, David Gardner and TMFPyad. Each of them has different investment styles, yet all three run very tight portfolios. Buffett's Big Bets Taken from his Shareholders' Letters, this is Buffett's record of common stock holdings as at the end of each year since 1977. Before going any further, there are two points to note from the above table: But even with those two caveats, the picture is clear: Including his other investments, Buffett has compounded the asset value of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) at an average of around 20% since the mid-1960s. Lessons from America On to David Gardner, owner of the US Fool's Rule Breaker Portfolio. Here's a similar table, taking the Rule Breaker's position as at the end of each year. A point to note here is that the Rule Breaker had incorporated the "Foolish Four" mechanical strategy until 2000. Before their ejection, the Foolish Four were largely irrelevant to the overall size of the portfolio. So, in a sense, the Rule Breaker has also achieved its success from running a sub-10 stock portfolio. Notice too how the Rule Breaker has averaged a 30% weighting in just one stock. The latest figures show that the Rule Breaker has compounded its growth at around 40% per annum since inception. Bet the farm And finally, TMFPyad. Now, TMFPyad doesn't run a "public" portfolio in the same way as Buffett or Gardner, but another table can be deduced from his Value reviews of 1999 and 2000. Ignoring a "side bet", this is the ultimate in concentrated portfolio operation. According to TMFPyad, his own portfolio generated a 452% return in the seventeen months from September 1998. Qualiport So, how does the Qualiport shape up on a similar year-end analysis? Although the Qualiport has had a reasonably focused portfolio over its short life, it hasn't managed to succeed in its market-beating quest. Entering 2000, the Qualiport's largest holding was an (in hindsight!) over-rated Misys (LSE: MSY) (the subsequent share price performance of which can be seen here) and the start of 1999 saw the Qualiport weighted towards a soon-to-go-ex-growth Rentokil Initial (LSE: RTO) (the share price performance of which can be seen here). Nevertheless, we're still running a concentrated portfolio. Here's how the Qualiport stands now. If anything, the portfolio continues to increase its focus. But only time will tell whether our stock picking has improved. It stands to reason that the more concentrated a portfolio you have, the greater the chance of diverging from the stock market mean. But of course, the real investment trick is to ensure that your concentrated portfolio consists of shares that will subsequently diverge in the correct direction! Your turn Just for fun, here are two polls to discover whether Qualiport readers run focused portfolios. Q1. How many different companies currently make up your share portfolio? * 5 or under Click here to vote. Q2. What percentage of your portfolio's value does your largest individual holding currently represent? * Under 10% Click here to vote. Your thoughts on the benefits or dangers of running a focused portfolio can be directed to the Qualiport message board.Year
Number of Portfolio Percentage
Companies Held of Largest Holding 1977 9 18.4
1978 8 19.7
1979 13 20.31980 18 19.9
1981 15 31.3
1982 11 32.7
1983 10 31.1
1984 10 31.3
1985 7 49.7
1986 5 42.8
1987 3 48.9
1988 5 35.6
1989 5 34.81990 6 40.2
1991 8 41.5
1992 9 34.2
1993 9 37.0
1994 10 36.9
1995 7 33.7
1996 9 37.9
1997 8 36.8
1998 7 36.0
1999 6 31.52000 TBA TBA
Year
Number of Portfolio Percentage
Companies Held of Largest Holding1995 8 27.1
1996 10 26.2
1997 13* 19.1
1998 13* 28.2
1999 11 37.5
2000 7 36.3(* includes one "short")
Year
Number of Portfolio Percentage
Companies Held of Largest Holding1999 1 100.0
2000 1 100.0Year
Number of Portfolio Percentage
Companies Held of Largest Holding
1998 6 21.0
1999 8 23.0
2000 6 26.8
Holding
Portfolio Percentage
PizzaExpress 28.4
MMT Computing 25.7
Independent Insurance 18.9
Lloyds TSB 12.0
Emap 10.3
Dell Computer 4.7
* Between 6 and 10
* Between 11 and 15
* Between 16 and 25
* Over 25
* Between 10% and 20%
* Between 20% and 30%
* Between 30% and 50%
* Over 50%