Skip Navigation

Tackling Your Council Tax

<%=_author %>
By Cliff D'Arcy | 27 March 2008

On top of ever-increasing bills for mortgages, food, fuel and petrol, hard-pressed householders face an above-inflation rise in their Council Tax. According to the Department for Communities and Local Government, the average Council Tax bill in England will rise by 4% with effect from next month.

Band D households face an average rise of £53, with bills increasing from £1,321 to £1,374. In 1999/2000, the average Band D bill was just £798, so it has leapt by £576 in nine years. The Band D rate has risen by more than seven-tenths (72%) over this period, which comes to 6.2% a year compounded. Hence, Council Tax is gobbling up a higher and higher proportion of our income.

Then again, these are the lowest increases in Council Tax for fourteen years. Indeed, in 2003/04, bills rose by more than an eighth (12.9%); recent yearly rises have been more modest. What's more, the government may order some councils (possibly as many as forty) to limit this year's increase to 5%. Although this would bring down householders' contributions to local government spending, it would require councils to cut back on their services in order to remain in budget.

Council Tax bands (England)

Council Tax assigns properties into eight bands -- the more valuable the property, the higher its band. Here are the bands for England, based on property valuations from 1991:

Band

Property value

Multiple of

Band D

A

up to £40,000

2/3

B

£40,001 to £52k

7/9

C

£52,001 to £68k

8/9

D

£68,001 to £88k

1

E

£88,001 to £120k

11/9

F

£120,001 to £160k

13/9

G

£160,001 to £320k

15/9

H

£320,001+

2

As you can see, Council Tax for a Band A property is two-thirds of the Band D bill, whereas the rate for a Band H property is double Band D. For example, I live in a Band F property, so my Council Tax is 1.44 times the Band D rate. For the record, my bill for 2008/09 is £2,230, up 3.57% on the previous year. Thus, I'm obliged to cough up an extra £77 this year.

Council Tax: like it or lump it!

Almost two in three properties in England fall into Bands A to C, so most of us pay less than you'd expect. What's more, Council Tax only funds around a quarter (25%) of council spending, with the remainder coming from central government and business rates.

However, Council Tax is a statutory tax imposed on us by law, so we have to ‘like it or lump it'. Alas, failure to pay your Council Tax can lead to a prison sentence. Hence, when preparing your household budget, make Council Tax your top priority.

How can you curb your Council Tax?

In brief, there are four ways to reduce your Council Tax:

1.    Claim the single-occupant discount. If you are the only adult (excluding students) in your household, then you qualify for a 25% reduction in your bill. However, you only get this discount if you ask for it, so don't forget to tell your council that you live alone.

2.    Claim Council Tax benefit. If you are on a low income or rely mainly on state benefits, then you may qualify for means-tested help. For more advice, visit the Department for Work and Pensions website.

3.    Appeal against your valuation. For more information on how to lower your band, read Cutting Your Council Tax and The Risk Of Rebanding Your Council Tax.

4.    Move to a cheaper property!

Right, that's it from me. I'm off to set up a standing order for ten monthly payments of £223. Ouch!

More: Boost your budget with a top savings account | Current Discounts and Deals #31 | Save £270 On Your Mobile Phone Bill

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 08:36 on March 30 2008, peterski said:

I think its high time that us private sector workers did more to encourage local and central government to scrap their employees 'gold plated' pensions. I'm positive that without this burden our taxes would be a lot less and the services a lot better,
Peterski

At 08:58 on March 30 2008, SystemAddict said:

Peterski neglects to consider that if public employees did not have index-linked final salary pension schemes, they would demand higher salaries - in the years when I was a civil servant, annual pay increases based on comparisons with the private sector were invariably discounted to take into account the superior public pension provision.

At 09:30 on March 30 2008, Rod1944 said:

I recollect reading somewhere, maybe Fool's pages, that a large percentage (26%?) of our council tax payments form contributions to our council employees protected pension fund. This is a staggering amount from those already on low standard pensions that have increased only £0.25!!!! Surely, some amendment to pensioners council tax payment/their pension income has to be made.

At 09:38 on March 30 2008, sabretooth321 said:

SystemAddict has a point, but where does that leave the masses on the minimum wage with no oportunity to afford a contribution to a private pension of any sort? ....on the bus to poverty in old age if you ask me!

At 09:50 on March 30 2008, spooky2001 said:

Actually I think you'll find that in this scenario we shouldnt even worry about looking at higher wages if you cut out their pension deficit.

The cost of supplying an index-linked final salary pension to each civil servant is growing exponentially over time compared to an almost linear wage.

To fill the void of finding the missing amount to fill the gap of providing that pension over time - as well as existing members payouts too of course, needs an ever increasing amount paid into the pension.

As stock markets refuse to rise so the cost of providing the missing money in the pension pot rises over time.

Oh and the irony about the comment about lower wages, check out the people in the council who are earning over 100,000. The press highlighted them recently.

(Tax payers alliance)
http://tpa.typepad.com/media/2008/03/the-sun-counc-1.html

Like any company, the lower workers always earn relatively nothing and the top guys the most. Except the guys earning minimum wage at Tesco's can't even have a chance of getting gold plated, bullet proof, final salary pensions, you dont even hear them complaining about that.

Its just simply not sustainable to provide these pensions anymore, even life companies themselves (the people who provide pensions services) cannot afford to pay their own staff decent final salary pensions and certainly not truly index-linked. Even they have to pray inflation stays low (under 3 or 5% usually) otherwise their pension is slowly being eroded and if inflation did get higher their loses would increase to the point that their pensions would half in a relatively short space of time. I myself saw my grandad become impovrished because of not having index-linking. At the end he couldn't afford to replace anything that broke and he had a very good job in the private sector.

I'm afraid everyone that it really boils down to 'Greedy Gordon the Gopher your pension' stealing the tax credits from pension schemes. That has ruined the pension dreams of everyone else bar civil servants and ministers. The knock on effect for this ignorant piece of legislation, has also cost people's jobs within the life industry as more people opt out of actually having any pension at all.

I myself dont save for a pension because its just not worth it, you need over 160,000 in the pot before you can equal the minimum income guarantee. Thats a lot of money to waste.

If it wasn't for the stock market going down nobody would have noticed civil servants pension costs. People in the private sector have provided for their own pension, everyone has to do the same.

At 12:54 on March 30 2008, Jocktamson said:

My Fool email said: "Across the UK, hefty Council Tax bills are hitting doormats."
Not so. Council Tax in Scotland has been frozen in an agreement between the SNP government and the local authorities. This is in advance of a manifesto promise to replace the grossly unfair Council Tax with a local income tax, so that the burden of local services is share more equitably among those who use them.

At 07:06 on March 31 2008, Lesley112 said:

People complaining about poorly paid local government employees getting a pension should be aware that they are not civil servants, they have made contibutions to the pension scheme. I certainly would not class the pension scheme as 'gold plated' but I work in the public sector because I want to give something back to the community, as do many others. Don't begrudge us some rewards!

At 12:27 on March 31 2008, teaboy100 said:

Wouldn't it be great if the government and local councils lead the way and showed us all how to manage our money better, by reducing their waste (and therefore money), and unecessary expenditure.
Sadly it is only the determined individuals amongst us who make any effort to live within their means.
The Government is the worst offender for wastage and out of control spending. They don't manage their bank accounts like we have to, and so much money simply disappears into innumerable unaccountable black holes.
The result is that you and I pay way too much council tax, and receive next to nothing back for it.
In the words of the pub landlord - Shame on you !

At 21:06 on March 31 2008, Sinbadlee said:

Thanks Motley for the advice given to tackle the tyrannical Council Tax: Although option 4 is a bit excessive I thought.
I thought that Teaboy100's comments were well said, However, I feel that it would be really difficult for all those poor council <1>officers to actually have the time to practice their own preaching - evidence that the tail is wagging the dog, methinks.
Call me a cynic, but in addition to all the Council Tax anomalies being sponsored by central and local governments alike, under the guise of it's the law, spare a thought for the 26p in the pound (approx)of the council house rents that's finding it's way back to the treasury to help towards selective and yet undisclosed, and probably very dark, areas.
With all this taxation, seemingly for the sake of it, it's as though George Orwell was only a few decades out in his calculations for 1984. Thanks Gordon... not!

At 14:12 on April 03 2008, skimo12 said:

Hello all,
I've got a question. Can you please clarify that I can claim the single-occupant discount if I live in the house with one student lodger?

Cheers,Skimo12

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Your Money? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Latest Stories

© Copyright 1998-2008, The Motley Fool Limited. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only.
The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool, Inc.
Place of Reg: England & Wales. Company Reg No: 3736872. VAT Reg No: 735 7818 01. Registered Office: 30 Great Pulteney Street, London W1F 9LT.


USEQ\EQWEB09