Skip Navigation
 

Avoid This Big Financial Mistake

My latest blog

My Ultimate Financial Pet Hates

Published in Insurance on 4 July 2008

If you need to make cut backs to your budget, cancelling insurance policies to save money is a big risk.

If your budget seems more stretched than usual, you must be thinking about making cut backs. With mortgage costs, food, fuel and energy prices spiralling out of control, making ends meet can be a real challenge.

But, alarmingly, some of us are dealing with thinly-spread finances by cancelling essential monthly payments such as premiums for life insurance policies, critical illness cover and income protection.

The take up of new policies is doing badly too. According to the Association of British Insurers (ABI), sales of protection plans were down almost 17% in the first quarter of the year, compared with the same point in 2007.

Worse still mortgage broker, Mortgage Direct say only one in five new homeowners are taking out life insurance to cover their mortgage debt. This means the vast majority are opting to settle for compulsory buildings insurance only, and skipping other crucial policies.  

But by not insuring your life or your outstanding mortgage loan, you risk leaving your family in dire financial straits, should the worst happen. And cancelling critical illness cover or income protection policies can have major repercussions if you’re no longer able to work due to an accident or ill health.

Cut price protection

You may be surprised to hear that for many people, scrimping on protection policies may not actually make much difference to your budget.

Indeed, Fool partner, Moneyfacts.co.uk say the cheapest life insurance policy for a healthy woman aged 35 can with cover of £100,000 is just £6.20* a month. Likewise, for men, the cheapest policy currently on the market comes in at just £7.55 a month. (However, let me stress these are the cheapest deals on offer and not everyone will get these quotes. It depends on your individual circumstances.)

This is a small price to pay for vital protection and should be within the reach of most budgets. So don’t make the mistake of neglecting insurance because it may not be as pricey as you think.

Instead, take a look at these top tips for making protection policies more affordable:

Cutting the cost of protection

  • Policies which protect your health such as income protection insurance and critical illness cover are usually more expensive than life insurance. In an ideal world you would protect both your life and your health. If you have financial dependants and can only really afford one policy, then life insurance is probably your best bet.** Assuming you’re in good health, your premiums should be pretty low and usually provide a reasonably high level of cover. (Of course, if you don’t have dependants, then you may not need life insurance and it might be better to focus on income protection insurance.)
  • The cost of life cover has fallen dramatically over the last few years. If you already have a policy you may be able to reduce your premiums by switching the plan to a new insurer. Try comparing quotes at The Motley Fool Life Insurance Service.  
  • You can also cut the cost of life insurance by opting for cover that reduces over time. If you have a repayment mortgage, get a quote for decreasing term assurance (also known as mortgage protection assurance). Cover under this type of policy falls gradually as your mortgage debt is repaid, which equals cheaper premiums. 
  • To protect your family and children, consider a family income benefit policy. This policy usually pays out an income each year from the time of the claim until the end of the policy term. Because the total income which would be paid out reduces each year, premiums are lower than a policy which provides a level amount of cover throughout.
  • Re-think ‘luxury’ insurance policies such as private medical insurance (PMI). While private treatment is desirable, it’s a secondary need after life insurance.
  • In these uncertain economic times redundancy or unemployment cover may seem sensible in the face of a recession. But losing your job won’t necessarily have a major effect on your finances if you’re able to find new employment quickly at an equivalent salary. If money is tight, this is one policy you may be able to live without.

I can understand why it’s tempting to cut back spending on protection policies. But doing so leaves you and your family financially vulnerable. When a basic life insurance policy could cost just a few pounds a month, is it really worth taking the risk?

*For a non-smoker taking out a policy over twenty years. Premium as at 17 June 2008.

**In some circumstances, such as poor health, it may be more important to keep income protection insurance and/ or critical illness cover than life insurance.

The comments above are the opinions of the author only and do not represent advice specific to your circumstances.

This article has been approved and issued by Direct Life & Pension Ltd who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

The Motley Fool Insurance Service and The Motley Fool Life Insurance is a trading style of The Motley Fool Limited. The Motley Fool Life Insurance is provided and administered by Direct Life & Pension Services Limited. The Motley Fool Limited is an introducer appointed representative of Direct Life & Pension Services Limited, who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered office: Pinnacle House, A1 Barnet Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 2XX.

More: Be Careful What You Cut | Compare life insurance quotes at The Motley Fool Life Insurance Service.   

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

atseyes 07 Jul 2008, 8:35am

One thing to bear in mind is that the premiums for this type of insurance are often age-related and, when I worked in the life assurance industry, admittedly a good few years ago, this could be a significant factor.

mumandmore 07 Jul 2008, 9:40am

this is a really helpful article, but still unsure where to go from here. the equity in my house is twice what the mortgage is, so although am single with 2 small kids, perhaps i would be better off with crit illness or income protection? on comparison sites not a clue where to start with qu like level of cover needed, etc

Djaz 07 Jul 2008, 11:35am

Mumandmore - add up your monthly incomings and outgoings, and see what debt (mortgage, debts, credit cards) is on the books.

Then figure out how much your family would need to live on to cover all these expenses, should you be out of work or should the worst happen to you.

Then make that monthly figure into an annual figure. And figure out how much time you want to buy your family. Or how much you want to leave them.

For example, do you want the mortgage to be paid off by one lump sum payment? Do you want the kids to have their education paid for?

Critical Illness/Income Protection is about protecting your income if you can't work. Life Insurance is about what you leave to your dependents should the worst happen.

With two small kids you should DEFINITELY have Life Insurance!!!

Djaz 07 Jul 2008, 11:40am

Regarding this article - another angle to consider when thinking of cancelling policies is, what has changed since you took your policy out?

Has a sibling or parent passed away from a heart attack or hereditary disease? Has something changed in your personal health, have you been diagnosed with anything new since taking out your last policy?

If so, your premiums or monthly payments will be more expensive. Which is why people are advised to take out insurance EARLY - before anything's gone wrong with them or their relatives...!

As far as I can see Life Insurance and CI/IP is a game of Twist Or Stick - if you 'Stick' and take your policy early, the premiums (at least for Life Insurance) are guaranteed not to rise, whatever changes take place in your health, or that of your siblings.

keith1942 07 Jul 2008, 12:20pm

is life assurance as honest and straight forward as the general public believes. My son died last month leaving a widow and a young son. unfortunately the postmortem failed to reveal the cause of death but ruled out everything but natural causes, as a result an only interim death certificate was issued. the first assurance organisation we approached refused to react to this death certificate as no reason was given for the death and will only payout when the final certificate is issued which could take anything up to 2 years. As now the premiums will sease it is possible that the organisation could say that the policy has lapsed so they dont have to pay out.

ies2000 07 Jul 2008, 1:50pm

"This article has been approved and issued by Direct Life & Pension Ltd who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority."

REALLY??? I thought it was heavily biased!!

Ask yourselves the real question- do you actually NEED any of the above insurances?

I cancelled my life insurance once I had paid off my mortgage, self insure everything else and my only cover now is for my house and of course car - and I shp around for the best deals on both! If I see myself becoming short of work, I get my finger out and look for more. As for the rip-off purchase protection insurance, I have not and never will touch it with a bargepole!! The insurance industry is a rip-off we can all avoid!!

jadle 07 Jul 2008, 2:25pm

I entirely agree with ies2000. When I first hung the millstone of a mortgage round my neck (1966) no insurer was trying to sell me a Mortgage Protection or Critical Illness or Income Protection Policy - because they had not been invented (under those labels, at least); but also because I had an endowment policy, so they were getting their pound of flesh anyway. It seems to me these types of policy were devised about the time we all cottoned on to the fact that endowment mortgages were not so clever after all, to prevent the sheep the insurance industry had got used to fleecing getting away unscathed.

Since I started working for an employer who provided me with life cover sufficient to pay off my mortgage - about 1984 - I have never had one of these policies. I have never regretted it, nor do I know any one who has.

1Dee 07 Jul 2008, 8:37pm

I and my husband both have decreasing life insurance to cover our mortgage which is quite expensive due to our ages 44 and 50, our relationship is second time round for both of us and we have over 20 years left to pay on our mortgage. Due to baggage from our previous relationships we both have bad credit histories. My husband heard over the weekend that insurance companies are now checking claimants' credit histories and if they are poor they are refusing to pay out assuming it is a fraudulent claim to pay off debts!!! If this is the case why on earth are we still paying for a policy which we will never be able to claim against even if the worst happens and either of us needs to? We also have buildings and contents insurance apparently the same procedure is now being applied there. Can this be legal or ethical?

dave02heasman 08 Jul 2008, 4:56pm

"My husband heard over the weekend that insurance companies are now checking claimants' credit histories and if they are poor they are refusing to pay out assuming it is a fraudulent claim to pay off debts!!! "

Believe half of what you see and nothing of what you hear. Obviously if you have dodgy histories they'll check you out a bit - and if you didn't declare them then your insurance is void, they won't pay and you're a fraudster. But provided you did declare full credit histories and you have to claim, they'll have to pay up eventually.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.