Skip Navigation
 

Bank Charges Have NOT Got Cheaper

My latest blog

Is It Right To Reclaim Bank Charges?

Published in Current Accounts on 30 May 2008

Barclays is once again changing the small print in its current-account contracts to try to get around the unfair bank charges issue.

Barclays is once again changing the small print in its current account contracts to try to get around the unfair bank charges issue.

The bank has reduced the fee it charges its customers for going overdrawn from £35 to £22.

When I saw Barclays' press release I was really hoping that it might do some good for poorer, more indebted people, but I remained cynical. Sadly, I was right to.

Here's how the standard, ‘free' account will operate from 2 June (including existing customers):

  • You still get no credit interest. (OK, for existing customers, it's a pointless 0.1%. But for new customers it really is zero.)
  • You can still get an agreed overdraft.
  • The agreed overdraft rate will go up from 15.5% APR to 18% APR.
  • You will be penalised by a lower figure of £22 if you exceed your overdraft limit.
  • The cost of bouncing an item will be £8.

That last two points need elaborating, because how the penalties will now work is quite complicated, and therein hides why most people will still end up paying roughly the same as before.

The ‘Personal Reserve'

If you exceed your agreed overdraft limit, you go into what Barclays has decided to call your ‘Personal Reserve'. Barclays will assign an individual Personal Reserve (PR) depending on your circumstances, but it claims the average PR will be £250.

It costs you £22 to go into your PR. Once there, you can make as many transactions as you like over a five-day period and not get charged again, provided that you don't exceed your PR limit. You are not charged interest on your PR (although you are still charged interest on your agreed overdraft).

If you exceed your PR limit, Barclays claims the item will bounce, at a cost to you of £8.

Here's why this isn't cheaper for those incurring charges

Most people with money trouble will continue to exceed their agreed overdraft limit and be charged for it.

Once they have been charged, they could continue to spend within their agreed PR limit without incurring further charges.

But I think many people will be too embarrassed, most of the time, to conduct transactions that they know will fail. So I think they will, as far as possible, delay further purchases for a few days.

And of course, the PR only lasts five days from the day you first exceeded your limit.

After those five days are up, if you spend again, Barclays will create yet another Personal Reserve at an additional cost of £22.

Therefore, I think most people will probably continue to incur the same number of charges as they did previously. These charges are lower (£22, rather than £35) but, as I said, the interest rate on the agreed overdraft has gone up to 18%. Running some rough figures I see that the costs will level out and make no difference.

A handful of people may benefit

I'll try now to look on the positive side. To start with, although most people struggling with finances won't be better off, they shouldn't be worse off either.

Furthermore, I think that, for the relatively few extra people who have items bounced, it may make them think sooner than they otherwise would that perhaps it's time to face their money trouble. It may encourage them to get debt guidance from such websites as The Fool, or even to call National Debtline.

Finally, all existing customers will be given an opportunity to opt out of having a Personal Reserve on their accounts. I strongly urge that you do this. If you're not making ends meet, you cannot borrow your way out of debt. Be strong, and take this opportunity to learn how to get out of it.

A new range of accounts

In addition to changing overdrafts and charges on its existing accounts, Barclays has invented a new range of bank accounts. Mostly it's just tinkering, but you should look for the account that is most suitable for you by searching all existing current accounts.

> Compare current accounts through The Fool.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

andrewbeaumont 30 May 2008, 3:03pm

Sorry, but a more obvious recommendation would be to avoid any bank (and Barclays has always been one of the worst offenders) that goes in for this sort of nonsense.

TMFVertigo 30 May 2008, 3:16pm

Thanks Andrew. I agree that people in th situation I described could certainly do better with another bank account. Indeed, Barclays' current accounts are not the best for anyone.
Neil (the author)

Dhahran2001 01 Jun 2008, 8:14am

TMF is to be congratulated for helping Barclays Bank cause its customers to think. I find it difficult be believe that if people read the small print, in all contracts, that there would be so many folk who feel they have been treated unfairly.

Let's agree the print has to be small; the rain forests will not last long if it isn't. Let's agree that probably only lawyers like reading and writing these contracts. But not reading them, just because you don't like doing so, is rather foolish.

DeeBee03 01 Jun 2008, 8:40am

I learned on Friday that Natwest are phasing out their present Visa credit card when I was approached by a nice young lady ("Ask for Kimmy")suggesting I consider closing my Visa card for NatWest's new model card. After two bad experiences of taking advice when I was approached by "financial advisers" my reaction is now to RUN AWAY, fast, from anyone trying to foist their financial advice on to me. Does anyone know why NatWest are phasing out their old Visa cards?

Teddybear999 01 Jun 2008, 9:07am

8I have recently joined the 'Think Banking' which is from the Newcastle Building Society in conjunction with The Royal Bank of Scotland. It's the first bank I know of that actually works for you as apposed to against you. There is absolutely no bank charges for going overdrawn or bouncing direct debits. Yes you heard right, no bank charges.

When you open an account they give two accounts, a bills account called salaries and a card account, conveniently called card account. These 2 account run alongside each other, monitored by Think Banking. You setup DD's and Standing orders and they do all the rest. Money gets paid into you account and anything required for DD's or suchlike the required amount is sent to your salaries account the rest goes to you card account for you to do what you like with. You automatically get a debit card when you join.

Now the only charge you get is a nominal monthly fee of £12. I know you think it's te same as a bank charge but considering the amount of work they do for you it's well worth it. You can even transfer money from you Bills account to your card if your short. They just delay paying the DD until money is available.

On a personal note since being with them I've never had so much money for myself and not have to worry in the slightest about bills. They really do take the worry out of banking.

dee211 01 Jun 2008, 9:31am

my brother is currrently with barclays. he went over drawn by £100 at christmas and barclays was quick to jump in and charge him £30 pounds for going over drawn,two days later they charged him again. then a dd came out so they charged him for the transfer. now because they did all that in a week they messed his account up. since then they have put him into a further £420 debt because they just keep charging him twice a month.so money he puts in isnt doing a thing. now they are going to cancel his a account and are demanding the outstanding balance. which is some of there fault as well as my brothers.

cbf1000 01 Jun 2008, 9:51am

I was with barclays for many years but left 7 years ago. I got fed up with their petty bank charges. Each time they charged me I would challange it & then they would cancell it. I have been with Nationwide since no problems.

ravomas 01 Jun 2008, 10:14am

As someone who although very hard up in earlier days was careful not to go overdrawn I felt annoyed when 'Which?' started their crusade against banks charging so much for overdrafts. I knew that if they were stopped doing this they would merely start taking money from others in order to maintain their profits. Sure enough 1st Direct started by cutting the miserable interest they paid on Current Accounts. Which? present editor probably doesn't remember when their earlier battle was to make Banks pay any interest on current accounts at all, so what goes around comes around.
I now have very little income each month and probably can't change to another Bank so I'm stuck with this. I feel that responsible people like me are paying for the feckless.

banker1000 01 Jun 2008, 10:36am

interesting article....can't help feeling a couple of points have been over looked?? I work in the industry and just want to add a couple of points. firstly banking in the UK is still FREE one of the only service sectors that still is, yet people demand the banks are fully staffed 9-5 and that they run your accounts correctly for you the customer. Secondly, its not the banks responsibilty to run your bank account for YOU. you are in control of your own spending and you should expect to be charged if you manage them inappropriately. the charges are designed to make you stop going overdrawn not as a money making scheme. and i know banks make billions (unfortunately not much of that comes from us! typically 1/5 which includes all sectors business banking,commercial banking,personal, mortgages,lending savings etc.) i feel the point barclays are trying to make is to honest and upfront with the charges tradionally something that the industry hasn't been happening. Remember there are millions of customers who manage their accounts correctly and don't get charged.
I do however agree with pressure groups and media spotlight to make the banks think hard to providing a better fairer service which for the past 20 years has been in favour of the banks.

TMFVertigo 01 Jun 2008, 10:45am

Hi banker1000. Your points were not overlooked, they just deviated a little too much from the point of my article. I'll save the debate over whether banking really is free, whether we should be penalised for going overdrawn, and whether Barclays really is making the changes just to be honest and upfront, for another article...But we may find ourselves having a disagreement! ;)

Neil (the author)

sstudent 01 Jun 2008, 11:02am

I take the point of a lot of what banker100 says. However, the fact is banks make an absolute fortune by hugely over inflated charges they impose. I agree a lot of the trouble people get into is down to their own irresponsibility, that said the banks feed on such people like piranhas. By all means have some sort of charging system I believe that cannot be avoided, but something much fairer & refelcting the admin costs of the banks. I would suggest that a more resaonable charge would be around £8-10 with safe guards to ensure the banks did not abuse this.

I feel that would a far better system along with a much clearer explanation to customers of the charges would be a very simple clear cut band of charges.

The best way to avoid such problems is by managing your money properly in the first place & having an agreed overdraft facility in place should you go overdrawn (let's face it we all do at some time). This way any charges levelled are a known quantity & much lower than unarranged overdrafts.

I have banked with nationwide for years & have had no real problems in charges over that time. I have an arranged overdraft that I do go into from time to time & yes I pay for that, but a darn sight less than I would otherwise.

So people the best thing is to shop around find a bank that meets your needs with such facilities as an overdraft facility & manage your money responsibly, it's that simple.

Varstar 01 Jun 2008, 11:08am

@banker1000
"the charges are designed to make you stop going overdrawn not as a money making scheme."
This is INCORRECT. Banks (and other companies) are NOT allowed BY LAW to punish you for breaking their rules (by hitting you with charges), they have to take you to court to do that! The charges are what it costs the bank to administer your account (they have to borrow the money from elsewhere, send letters, deal with defaults etc) and a slice of profit (though these days the profit seems to dwarf the actual costs). Please check you facts before posting incorrect information like this.
V.

dee211 01 Jun 2008, 11:33am

i know my brother went overdrawn and yes that was his fault but i think that alot of oeople do this around christmas. but i think that it was wrong of barclays to take the payments out so quickly and twice in a month is abit much. if they had not of done that then it wouldnt of got out control.i agree with sstudent that it should be about£8-10. £30 is to much.

Incontrol100 01 Jun 2008, 11:54am

So it now appears that my current account will soon attract charges, even though I work hard to keep it in credit.

Just like the tax and NI systems, the hard-working and responsible majority get to pay for the feckless, lazy and stupid.

To all of you who can't control their spending - it's not your money - live within your means.

danlayzell8 01 Jun 2008, 12:13pm

I feel that I need to balance this argument. I totally agree with banker1000 and Incontrol100. I also have nothing to do with banks or finacial services. My bank account is free. I do not get charged fees. I keep the amount I need for my outgoings in my standard bank account and transfer the rest into a "savings" account. I budget, I live within my means and my bank do not make much, if any, money from me. You can all do the same. Too many people in this country live above their means and spend money that isnt theirs and the banks have the right to make money from people using theirs. Market econonics and competion should be what controlls these fees. Investors have put their money into these banks and they too have the right to see a return on their investment. What has happened to personal responsibility. If you go overdrawn and have to pay a fee ... tough...learn to budget!

operabunny 01 Jun 2008, 12:26pm

Don't pay £12 a month!

Have 2 basic accounts and a decent easy access savings account (esavings/cash mini ISA).
-Get your salary paid into the first and set up all your DDs and SOs on the same account.
Work out how much money you need to pay DDs and SOs - this is how much you leave in the first account so nothing will ever bounce.
-Now work out how much you need for ordinary spending (food etc). Set this amount up as a regular transfer/SO from the first account to the second account for the day after your pay goes in (OK the drawback is ripoff transfer time between banks).
-Any leftover money goes to the savings account - again regular transfer/SO.
-If you have any additional expenditure e.g. night out/clothes shopping/car repairs you can then do an online/telephone transfer from the savings account.
-If you make it to the next payday with money left in the second account you can transfer it into the savings account.

That sounds more complicated than it is. Once it is set up all you do is transfer money to/from the savings account as and when you need it.

No fees, no accidental overdraft because a DD slipped your mind and at least some of your money earns interest. It is also much easier to see what you spend from day to day.

NB I know esavings accounts don't earn as much as some others, but this advice is really for those who don't have that much to save each month.

Malo101 01 Jun 2008, 12:45pm

My husband went £5 overdrawn on his business account with Abbey, due to someone cashing a cheque earlier than expected at the same time as Paypal took a regular payment from him. As there wasn't enough money for the Paypal bill to be paid in full, Paypal, kept attempting to take the full payment over and over again. Each time this happened, Abbey added an overdraft charge. My husband knew nothing about this until,by the next day, the fee had gone up to £160 and someone from Abbey called to notify him about it. We have a current account with Abbey and he could easily have transferred £5 from there and avoided this whole mess. If they were really concerned about him keeping enough money in his account to pay his bills wouldn't they would have contacted him before they started adding on the charges? (Paypal is also partially to blame.)

banker1000 01 Jun 2008, 12:51pm

@V.
whilst i whole heartedly agree with you that legally penalty charges are not to be administered the banking industry (as per recent court case)if the real cost was to passed on to the customer (between £2 and £4) i can't help feeling the banks would critised for not doing enough to prevent people from going overdrawn? and i offer my opinion and don't claim to represent the banking industry legally, i just work there...

NornIron 01 Jun 2008, 1:13pm

Almost everytime I read of someone incurring charges it's always been the fault of the account holder, which the willingly admit. I understand anyone can make a mistake and banks generally remove the charge for a first offence. A lot people are repeat offenders. Why blame the banks for poor account management? They need some sort of charge structure to prevent abuse. If you spend money which doesn't belong to you what do you expect? Banks haven't the resources to contact people who go overdrawn or is this a service you would willingly like to pay for. I don't know of many other service industries that provide their services for free.

Most people can have a bank account,just like a lot of people can drive a car however there will always be people who will crash their car. Learning to live within your means can be a costly lesson, and I have sympathy for people who are struggling, however currently the only option is to learn to manage your account or pay the price.

I believe no matter what charge policy a bank comes up with, there will always be complaints, hence the reason I suggest better account management.

Why don't we wait and let the courts or OFT decide.

pigbinjosh 01 Jun 2008, 1:32pm

Here's another thing banks do just to annoy us:

My wages go into my account at the end of every month and my mortgage co. insists on taking it's DD payment on the 2nd of the month. At times when there is a bank holiday at the begining of a month, this can mean that my wages are delayed but that the mortgage is paid as normal; so both come out the same day. Which shouldn't be so bad, you'd have thought but no, here's what the bank does; it tries to deduct all outgoings from the account in the morning, finds that there is not enough funds and takes great delight in bouncing not only the mortgage payment but others too (which it should be able to pay seeing as the mortgage money is still in the account!) charging me £25 several times over.

Then, later in the same day, they pay into my account the money which has been stacked up all weekend just waiting to go in; funds which would have more than covered all of the payments they bounced earlier in the day!

Would it be too much to ask that banks paid money into accounts in the morning and then tried to take all the DDs in the afternoon? Or at least looked at what was due in before whooping with joy and snatching another clutch of £25 bounced payment charges?

It's hard to know whether this is just stupidity on their part or yet another vindictive scheme to give themselves more excuses for charging customers who otherwise do not go overdrawn.

Piggie

geoffaries 01 Jun 2008, 2:29pm

The banks are blatantly profiteering from their customers, they could revert to the days of old when they would simply not pay any requests for payment if there was insufficient money in the account, they would notify you that the payment was not made and ask you to make funds available, to notify you costs very little, just a standard letter and you did not get repeatedly charged fees and interest, the reason that banks stopped this practice was so that they could make moe profit by misleading customers into thinking having an overdraft and excess overdrawn charges was somehow providing a service.

NornIron 01 Jun 2008, 2:56pm

"Misleading customers" - I fail to understand this point. Only a very small percentage of customers seem to be mislead i.e. those who incur charges and they never seem to learn first time round. How many times can people be mislead? I doubt the banks can take all the blame.

"To notify you costs very little" - then you shouldn't have a problem paying such a small cost. Why not advise your bank of this and see what they say.

blkbrd101 01 Jun 2008, 4:36pm

It seems there is quite a lot you don't understand. Read the input from pigbinjosh who has hit it squarely on the head. Why do you think banks deduct for DDs, etc BEFORE they have their customers deposits credited, particularly when they know that these deposits are just about certain - and sitting there in the bank's 'inbox' over the weekend. And that money is not gaining any interest for the customer but you bet the banks are earning on it. Get real.

Turboloon 01 Jun 2008, 4:42pm

I have been a barclays customer for over 24 years sincxe living in this country and have racked up unfortunetly over 800 quid worth of bank charges...this duely can be because i went over my current account wether £3.00 or £10.00 and in doing so got charged a set fee of £30.00. What I noticed here is no one has stated that Barclays can charge u 3 times the amount of £30.00 in one month which they have done to me.
As for trying to claim your money back...i haven't done so due to the fact since I have an overdraft with them, if I went for the claim they can then chuck me out of the bank and I would have to pay back my overdraft amount straight off....so i keep hearing.
Any advise would be helpful.
Thanks

blkbrd101 01 Jun 2008, 4:58pm

Neil - Don't you think that anyone who has their income paid directly into a Bank that there is no excuse for the Bank then to turn around and debit their accounts BEFORE their salaries have been credited especially if the salary has been sitting idle over a weekend which is something I find curious in this day of computerization. As has been suggested, why is the salary not credited firsrt and then DDs, etc. paid out. If that same customer has a savings account with the same bank the bank should automatically transfer funds to meet any deficits before penalizing the customer with charges. Or, would that be too simple?

gillianswain 01 Jun 2008, 4:59pm

As a percentage of the number of banking customers, I doubt that there are too many people that are "feckles". A lot of people get into trouble when they lose their jobs or become too old to work or because their lives are so busy they overlook something. Any money you have in an account is there for the banks to use - and they use our money to invest in the stock-market etc., so banking is not really "free" as when you deposit money you are making an INTEREST FREE LOAN TO THE BANK. Try doing the reverse and taking a loan from the bank - I bet they charge you. This is the deal we have with banks and that is fair enough, but the extra over-inflated, sneaky charges (hidden in large amounts of small print) are not. One other irritating way they now make lots of money from us now is through call centres - you hold on for ages waiting to speak to somebody (the banks get a lot of money from the telephone companies for this) and quite often you land out talking to someone in another country who it is sometimes very difficult to understand because of the problems of different accents (mine as well as theirs). So often your call is wasted or you have to phone back again - even more money for the bank - or give up in frustration. (Its just the same with the so called "reality" TV "pay to vote" programmes). I'm old enough to remember the days when the banks really did treat you as a "customer" whose custom they wanted. Now, unless you have millions they really don't care too much. I should also mention that I have also worked in the banking industry but in those days we had to balance by hand not with a computer and when we got into serious trouble if we were not polite, didn't give good service or were more than £1-00 out on our balance.

seanturner83 01 Jun 2008, 5:25pm

"At times when there is a bank holiday at the begining of a month, this can mean that my wages are delayed" - you should read your contract of employment - it's extremely unlikely that your employer wrote into it a paying you whenever they feel like it clause, and much more likely that they have guaranteed you either a pay date (by which the funds have to be cleared) or to pay you before the end of the month (which means that they have to pay you early if there is either a weekend or a bank holiday - I was paid on Friday 30th, as were most people in full time employment) - if they are not paying you correctly you need to either file a formal written grievance or find another job - not blame your bank.

watever666 01 Jun 2008, 5:34pm

Can I just add however- it's alright saying live & spend within ur means- but what about the unexpected when u have an accident or sick that's not ur fault & u have to stay off work with SSPay? Unfortunately not everything goes to plan! The issue is that yes some people don't have enough money and I accept there should be a consequence however I question does it really cost £35 every time something bounces? Natwest do not even send a letter advising of a charge applied- and that is what the issue is- HOW MUCH THEY'RE CHARGING!!

GuyZieseniss 01 Jun 2008, 6:42pm

I have been in UK for 3 years now and I firmly believe that banks in this country are “ripping off” the general public, relying on the stupidity of the masses for their revenue. As soon as I had accumulated some money in my current account, I was enticed into opening savings accounts that offer a higher rate of interest. This seemed great until I took a 2 week holiday. I have a direct debit on my current account for credit card to be paid in full, but because my credit card was nearing its limit, I decided to transfer (pay) £2000 into my card before my holiday started. This was about a week before the direct debit was due. The end result was that the full card balance as at the month end date was still removed from my account and paid into the card causing my account to become overdrawn. After this, for each and every direct debit against my account, I was charged £25; one of these for a £5.99 direct debit. I was charged £150 that month. They have system in place to identify when you have not made a payment and automatically charge you a penalty, but no systems in place to identify when you have paid some or the entire due amount. All this while I had £12000 in my savings account and over £6000 in my mini-ISA. The bank can and does earn a fortune trading with our saving money while giving us a meagre 4%. Revenue should be earned off the trading with the savings of their wealth clients rather than with the unfair penalty payment from the stupidity/mistakes of their general clients.

I want a bank account that will reject any DD that would make my account become overdrawn; at no charge. The direct debit issuer can contact me to rectify the matter. I want a bank account that will transfer funds from my savings accounts, if available, to cover any direct debits; at no charge.

The bank in question is HSBC. I have been meaning to move my accounts for 8 months now, but all the banks have the same illegal (unfair) policies. But then again… I’m one of the stupid people that the banks prey upon. They are laughing at us and really don’t care if we move. There are millions of new stupid people that can be conned into using there services. Some wise up and leave… the rest (majority) are too lazy (stupid) to do anything.

djennma 01 Jun 2008, 8:09pm

To a certain extent I can understand both sides of this discussion, but I have to say the people who think it's easy and that charges are just tough: they're being a bit harsh.

I finally learned how to manage my money about 3-4 years ago and now have a health savings account for the first time in my life. Although I'm nearly 40, I still have a ways to go before I can hope to own my own place but I'll get there...

Before that I was hopeless. I can understand other people who've had problems. I have a degree and a business qualification, so you'd think I'd have been ok but we're apparently among the worst!

Thing is, you always assume that awkward timings will work out ok, eg you think the salary will get in JUST in time to save the DDs, etc. Also, your memory is short - you're too busy or tired or whatever to remember that situation X that was ok last month actually caused you charges the couple of times previous to that. And so it went on. And NONE of it was trying to live outside my means. For instance, some of my clothes are older than some of my younger work colleagues!

The only reason I managed to turn my act around was coming into a small sum of money that prompted me to make a big push and finally pay everything off. Then when I was back in the black, I had the incentive to keep going and I've kept things on an even keel ever since then. Reading internet helpsites/blogs/newsletters such as the fool have given me the tools and the inspiration to make the effort.

But anyone who says this is easy - it's just a skill you have and it's not easy until you have the skill. It's something you learned, something everyone should learn, but you have no right to look down on those that haven't done so yet. Maybe we should teach this stuff at school...

Teddybear999 02 Jun 2008, 3:20am

Operabunny you seem to be missing my point. I am disabled. I don't want to work it out. I've got more important things to do with my time than work out what I'm gonna spend and when I'm gonna spend it. Which never happens in reality anyway due to other factors like your shopping bill. You can't say what it's gonna be till you've got it. Or the emergency when you have to replace a couple of tyres. Decisions decisions do you pay a bill or do you get your tyres. I don't want to worry about a thing.

This is where the Think Banking comes in they worry for me, why, because i pay em to. And I can't go overdrawn because they don't issue cheque books, there's no need for them. Everything can be done by Debit card. I can still get my tyres in an emergency because i can transfer money from Bills to card and still not have to worry about bills.

TMFVertigo 02 Jun 2008, 8:22am

Hi blkbrd101

Yes, I agree it's dodgy that banks take debits before they add credits. We've mentioned it on The Fool before.

Your idea of the bank transferring funds automatically from linked savings accounts has advantages for many people, but not many for the bank that I can think of at this second!

Neil (the author)

dobba2 02 Jun 2008, 9:32am

It seems to me that a lot of the comments here are from people who refuse to take responsibility for their own finances and are just looking for someone else to push the blame to.

Stop complaining and do something about it!

If you know that bank holiday etc cause a problem with your mortgage payments - have you considered contacting your mortgage company to change the date (by 1 day) that your mortgage is collected?

Instead of thinking it's acceptable to go overdrawn at Christmas - because everyone does it try budgeting in the year. If you normally spend £20 a person for 10 people try buying a present a month - taking advantage of the sales. You are less likely to notice £20 a month being spent in this way than £200 in December.

At the end of the day it is important to remember that a bank is a business. A business will run at a profit. Just like clothes shops, shoe shops, mobile phone companies ...

Nobody gets anything for free.

Don't forget even in the truely 'free' service industry a library will charge you for the late return of a book!

Why expect a bank to be any different?

villagegrump 02 Jun 2008, 10:07am

Like everybody else on this blog I have fallen foul of all the Banks ripoffs so its my lifelong ambition to get my own back. I have an Abbey Business Account which I have challenged but have to wait untill the National Court Case is settled before I get paid back. So I have emptied the account and opened another with Alliance & Leicester but I have not closed the Abbey account.What I do now is pay 1 cheque a month in using there free post envelope and as soon as it has cleared transfer the amount over the internet elswhere. They have to send me a Statement each month advising that I have a zero balance - surely that must be costing them !
Similarly I opened an Egg account when it was good but then when it was no longer competitive moved on but left 70p in. For 3 years now they have sent me a monthly statement advising that I have 70p. What has that cost them over 3 years ?
If you do this with any redundant accounts you have, although you don`t get any money back, at least you can put 2 fingers up to the banks and it makes you feel good.
Is this sad or what.

moleylabbie 02 Jun 2008, 10:32am

I find this all very strange.

I have had problems with banks before now (I mean you HSBC, Woolwich and even Abbey) but I have never been charged - am I very lucky or am I just careful?

Answer I'm not silly. Yes I go overdrawn on occassions when things don't go to plan but I have an overdraft facility on all my accounts which covers any small mistakes or unplanned extra's.

Currently my husband and I are with Abbey and have a personal account each and then a 'Bill' account which all our dd's go out off so we pay money into each month on pay day to cover the outgoings, this way we known exactly what we have left over as soon as we get paid. It was Abbey themselves who suggested this set up and insisted we had a suffcient overdrafts to cover ourselves in case something happened. I have to admit this has worked out very well and even when I was off work ill for a month on SS Pay we still were able to pay everything without incurring charges. Yes we still paid interest on the money overdrawn but it was considerably less that £25 per item!

When I was a student (and even now) I was amazed how many of my fellows believed the overdraft was just more money they could use without thinking about it. I myself worked part time and wouldn't have dreamed of asking my parents for handouts or using my overdraft any more then I abosultely had too, but all the others just seemed to think this was normal. - surely we should be teaching money management in schools as part of maths? Otherwise we are heading for real problems in a couple of generations time

So I agree people need to learn to manage their money - yes there will always be the odd problem but with careful planning - eg have an overdraft for emergencies only and not a night out on the town - you can still cover yourself and avoid high costs.

One last thing - to pigbinjosh you can change when your dd's go out you know. Once you have paid you first payment you can contact them to request changing the payment date. I have done this a number of times so that all my payments go out around the same time without any problems.

Kitxp123 02 Jun 2008, 1:49pm

Two quick points...
No.1> Banker 1000... banking is not free. And I don't mean bank charges, I mean the lack of interest they pay on current accounts. The majority of current accounts offered by banks will pay either 0% or 0.1% interest. Seeing as they make Billions of pounds from investing this money, lending it to other institutions and other customers for 5% - 18%, our 0.1%(if we're lucky) is [pretty pathetic). So in a nutshell we don't get free banking.

Secondly, going off the subject somewhat.
I am an ex-barclays employee.
I worked for them for 3 years.
I took out a staff loan of £7000 to buy a car as the staff rate was excellent.
I paid the repayments on time every month.
2 years after taking out the loan I left the company. I continued to pay on time every month. Then 2 months after leaving I received a letter from Barlcays stating that I was no longer eligible for staff rates and I would need to visit the branch to switch to a standard customer rate(fair point I thought).
At my appointment with the personal banker he informed me I would have to make a new application altogether. This application was refused due to an insufficent credit rating!!
He explained there was nothing else he could do.
1 week later I received a letter demanding settlement of the remaining loan (£5000ish) within 7 days!
I had to take out a number of small loans, overdrafts, etc.
If Barclays can treat ex-staff in this way, it's not suprise they treat customers the way they do.
My advice...stay clear of Barclays
If possible stay clear of banks.
Building Societies seem to have some ethics remaining.

Littlemog 02 Jun 2008, 1:56pm

If they charged you once, or at least a lot less often, it wouldn't be so bad. It's the snowballing that's getting people in trouble.

There seem to be two people concerned in this arguement - the careful people that never go overdrawn and are now angered that the banks are having to make up for lost profit, and "the utterly stupid people regularly going overdrawn."

I fall in to the first category (of being careful, not angered). I know someone that fits in the third category. That is the "Not under my control, and now I have the financial means, it's gone up so high I still can't pay it." category.

You're a student and part time worker. You got a charge just before you lost your job because you're getting shuffled between one parent and the other and the move is to far away to commute to work.

So you can't pay that charge.

Rather than saying "Hmm, looks like they can't pay it, lets arrange something with the customer, such as a loan or stopping some direct debits Which would surely be a more responsible course of action than charging you over and over again when they can see you're not affording it.

The don't. You have difficulty finding a job because you're moving again in 4 months and no-one wants to hear it. Nor can you take them to the court (before the waiver was in) because you don't have that £80 to your disposal, and neither does your family.

You finally do get some income (this happens to be your student loan, 4 months later). Unfortuneatly by this time the amount of charges have gone up, and over the initial £50 or so, there's an additional £500. Add that to your rent deposit and travel costs, and you don't have enough to stay where you're living until you've got a job.

Unfortuneatley you have difficulty getting a job until 6 months later. At this point, you now 'owe' the bank £800, after a nice letter saying "We will be charging you £20 a day up to 10 times a month"

Now, as a student now with a part time job (so lets say, 18 hours) £300-a-month rent and other debts you got into when you were 16 and now thoroughly regret, you're working at a loss. Nevermind having to pay £200 a month just to keep your overdraft at evens with what it was last month.

(Me and him have actually drawn up a budget sheet - with the job, he's 75p in the positive each week before the credit card debt, which we're currently negotiating with the AIC.)

Having had the previous difficulty with jobs, your credit rating's not too high either, and a 0% credit card is out of the question.

It's actually not possible. You've told the bank this, and they've just shrugged, then given you the "we have a waiver, can't help you." rather than allow you to freeze it and set up some sort of payment plan within your budget.

Scenarios like this might not happen often, but the fact is, they happen, and the way things stand now the banks make no exception whatsoever for them.

I, personally, don't mind if my interest isn't what it could be, because I know that then at least the minority won't be getting utterly screwed because we thought "Well, they deserved it."

And for those who say "He should have sorted out his money before uni" - every full time job he's had the money has been sucked out of him to pay towards the debt other family members have gotten themselves into, so no luck there unfortuneatley. Additionally, why should he be denied education, when he made a £50 mistake once - the original loss of job not being his fault in the first place. If he could have acted faster to stop the £50, it doesn't really deserve £800 on top.

Littlemog 02 Jun 2008, 2:02pm

Erm, sorry about forgetting to close the b tags after "£500" (and quoting instead of italicising, I thought that meant "It's good practice to put your quotes in italics" Sorry )
Can anyone with mod-ly powers edit that at all?

Additionally, I thought it was against the OFT guidelines to tell you to take out more debt, kitxp? (2.6a, to be exact, if you can find their document) In fact, for them to demand something you can prove you can't afford? (2.6f?) (And I don't see why the bank charges seem to be in exception of this?)

laalaa41 02 Jun 2008, 2:26pm

In response to the earlier post

Are we assuming that if anyone goes into an unauthorised overdraft it must be purely down to their own mismanagement? I am someone who never needed an overdraft because I always have - at least for the past 6 years - been in credit. Until three direct debits were removed from my account - 2 before the date I agreed to and 1 from an account I cancelled 6 months before.

This is the crux, I think. Computers and the writer of the quoted post are unable to tell the difference between a company's mistake and a customer's nonchalant attitude to being overdrawn.

There's a language factor I find particularly annoying. "Additional borrowing" when in fact 2 of my DDs were not NEW borrowing but council tax and rent - decades old.

In the days when the local branch had a relationship with an individual, they were able to decide if the customer would somehow benefit from the penalty/smack on the wrist and smarten up their act. When banks went digital they discovered they could make an awful lot of money removing the personal touch.

laalaa41 02 Jun 2008, 2:31pm

"I want a bank account that will reject any DD that would make my account become overdrawn; at no charge."

I second this motion!

zannie05 02 Jun 2008, 9:24pm

I know what you are saying but I do the same in my bank acccount and it does not cost me £12.50 I simply opened 2 current accounts with Smile. My salary goes into one then I transfer one amount into the other for direct debits and bills. Anything left in the first account is mine to spend. nothing in the second can be touched as it is for direct debits bill payments et remember that £12.50 a month is actually £150 a year which is quite a lot of money. Oh and smile pay good interst on current accounts

zannie05 02 Jun 2008, 9:25pm

I know what you are saying but I do the same in my bank acccount and it does not cost me £12.0 I simply opened 2 current accounts with Smile. My salary goes into one then I transfer one amount into the other for direct debits and bills. Anything left in the first account is mine to spend. nothing in the second can be touched as it is for direct debits bill payments et remember that £12.50 a month is actually £150 a year which is quite a lot of money. Oh and smile pay good interst on current accounts. sorry I realise you said £12 but that is still £144

rcolemanuk 02 Jun 2008, 11:31pm

I have read most of the comments on this thread and just want to make a few pointers. Like banker1000 I too work in the industry but say these from a personal Banking experience.

- About the accounts. Most people only go overdrawn in a set period of a month (usually just before wages or benefits go into their accounts) this would make the 'personal reserve' perfect as the one charge of £22 for 5 days usage until the funds go in is FAR better than the £90+ that currently is still charged by other banks.

- Most other countries charge for current accounts (they don't offer free accounts full stop). The banks safeguard your money for free (provided you keep your account in order) they also cover you for fraud and provide you with safer ways to pay other people money. You can keep all your funds at home if you like (with the risk of being burgled and loosing everything money wise. Or you can move country and be forced to have an account you pay for.

- A lot of people have complained about the DDR's being taken out before the money goes in. This has been viewed and will be rectified with the new Faster Payments service. If the funds aren't available when DDR's, Standing orders or other payments are due to go out the system automatically will keep checking until later on (up until about 1.45pm) before it rejects the payment. It also means that you can transfer money between banks same day (up to set limits).

- It doesn't matter which bank you go to. There are always people who are going to complain about their charges. Mainly because they are angry with themselves for not keeping track of their own accounts, which in this day and age is so easy to do. Most banks offer (also for free) Online banking, Telephone banking and some even allow you to get your balance on your mobile) so there really is no excuse.

- While on the charges subject, Barclay's gives its customers time to rectify the problem before charging, up until switch of business (typically 3.30 for smaller branches and 4pm for larger ones). Unfortunately this does not seem to be the case for Abbey.

It was failed to mention that some of the new Barclay's current accounts have a credit interest rate of 3%.

- If a payment is taken early then that is the fault of the company taking the payment so they should cover any charges as it is their mistake.

Lastly (and I could go on but I wont) - As already stated, Most banks refund the first charge. So if it was a genuine one off mistake then there should be no quibbles. Also if it is found not to be the customer at fault then a charge is usually refunded.

As of yet I have not been charged. I keep an eye on my accounts. I keep a credit balance and I have a small overdraft set up in case something unexpected was to go out. When get paid all the money goes into my instant access savings account (the interest is calculated daily so I gain on that) and as the month goes on I transfer it back as and when needed. I have a higher rate savings which earns me even more on the money I don't use. I was always brought up to work within my limits and not spend what I cant afford.

Maybe the question we should be asking is 'are we teaching people from an early age to be responsible with money? Should there be lessons in schools covering money management? Is it the banks fault for this?'

moneywebber3 03 Jun 2008, 1:20am

I do have to commend you rcolemanuk as all of your points are valid!! The 'reserve' account notably has received some high opposition from many commentators on this site. Though those who have been quick to criticise have not mentioned how any of the other leading banks are addressing the issue that Barclays is trying to rectify.

As for the 3% I can hear many of you crying well thats pathetic in comparison to many other market leading accounts offering the same service. I also too watch those all singing and dancing (and may I add ridiculous) adverts boasting about how much interest different banks are offering on current accounts. All of them are different in their own way. For example some require you pay a set amount in every month (ranging between £1000 to £2000); some ask for the account to maintain a min balance of £2500 (for some this is a stupid requirement) and others charge a fee of around £25 to ensure customers get about 8%. Barclays have no set criteria. As long as the account is in credit you will receive interest on this.

As for taking money out early and not paying money in on time. As pointed out by rcolemanuk this should be rectified with the faster payments system. Though as only 13 founding banks are taking part initially there is no way of judging this efficiency. What you should know is that payments between banks take 3 - 5 days so banks can earn extra interest from that money whilst it is held in a floating account. So a payment from Barclays to an Abbey account will be held up for this reason but also the communica