Skip Navigation
 

Hands Off Our 0% Cards!

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

Fame And Fortune In The City

Published in Credit Cards on 14 March 2008

A senior Conservative MP has criticised 0% credit cards for getting people into debt. We explain why he's mistaken.

In an interview a week ago with the Financial Times, shadow business secretary Alan Duncan hauled banks over the coals. The senior Conservative MP rebuked credit-card issuers for using 0% credit cards to ‘seduce' people into taking on debts that they would not otherwise be able to repay.

Clutching a 0% credit-card mailshot sent to him by Barclaycard, Mr Duncan argued that lenders must "look at and appreciate...the individual human misery that will ensue on the back of this practice...This is not acceptable practice. This is corporate irresponsibility."

Alas, although I agree with Mr Duncan's concerns about debt, I am convinced that he is sadly mistaken about credit cards. Indeed, I would argue that he has firmly grasped the wrong end of the stick! For the record, we Fools are big fans of interest-free balance transfers and 0% on purchases deals. In fact, we view them as one of the most effective tools in the battle against debt.

How 0% balance transfers can save you a fortune

For example, let's say that you owe £5,000 on a typical credit card. On average, you'll be paying interest on this debt at around 16.5% APR. Now let's assume that you repay this balance via a standing order or Direct Debit of £200 a month. This will take you 31 months and cost you a total of £6,065.61. Thus, you've paid interest of almost £1,066 during this period.

However, by making use of 0% balance-transfer deals, you can repay your debt faster and slash your interest bill to zero. By moving your £5,000 to a card offering a lengthy 0% deal on transferred balances, you can avoid interest for a year or more.

Back to our example: let's say you move your five grand to the table-topping Virgin credit card, which offers 0% on balance transfers for fifteen months, on payment of a fee of 2.98%. Thanks to this fee, your balance jumps to £5,149, but you now pay no interest. Thus, when this interest-free period is up, your debt has fallen to £2,149, as you've made fifteen monthly repayments of £200.

Being a crafty ‘rate tart', you shift this balance to another 0% credit card just before your time's up. This time, you go for the Tesco credit card, which charges a fee of 2.5% for thirteen months of interest-free fun. After paying this fee, your debt rises to £2,202.73. Thanks to your monthly repayments of £200 (and a final extra payment of £2.73), your debt is cleared after eleven months.

So, let's recap: by playing your 0% cards right, you've enjoyed 26 months of interest-free credit. This costs you £149 and £53.72 in fees, a total of £202.73. Thus, by surfing your debt across two 0% balance transfers, you've paid £202.73 instead of the interest of £1,065.61 charged by your previous plastic. That's a saving of £862.89, which is well worth having.

The real problem is reckless lenders and eager borrowers

Therefore, in the right hands, 0% credit cards can be a force for good, enabling borrowers to become debt-free cheaply and quickly. On the other hand, I agree with Mr Duncan that, in the wrong hands, credit cards can become WMDs: Weapons of Money Destruction!

I also concur with Mr Duncan that irresponsible lending has contributed greatly to the UK's fifteen-year borrowing binge. By lending freely to anyone with a pulse, the banks have fuelled our ‘live now, pay later' culture. Then again, we borrowers must also share the blame, as no-one forced us to ‘keep up with the Joneses' by feasting on credit!

Also, I believe that Mr Duncan's fears would be eased if banks agreed not to extend further credit to those already burdened with debt. For example, when a cardholder switches a balance from card A to card B, card A should be closed in order to prevent the customer from doubling his/her access to credit. Limiting their access to credit would certainly help to prevent cardholders' debts from spiralling out of control.

Finally, I was once £50,000 in debt across thirteen credit cards and three personal loans, so I know at great cost how easy it is to create a deck of credit cards. If your debts are making you anxious, stressed or depressed, then it's time to ‘turn the tanker around'. Start with a visit to our Get Out of Debt centre and our Dealing With Debt discussion board. Good luck with dynamiting your debts!

More: Find cracking credit cards via the Fool | Eight Ways To Be A Better Borrower | Free Yourself From Credit Card Debt

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

johnnyc45 17 Mar 2008, 6:17am

I couldn't agree more, 0% transfers are great for controlled debt. I took my family to visit my daughter in Australia in 2004 and as a result incurred a debt of £4000 on my credit card. I started using 0% balance transfers which at first incurred no handing fee. Through the years I transferred from one card to another and by mid 2007 my debt was cleared. There's nothing wrong with eing in debt as long as it's controlled and you can see the way out. And by the way Fool.co.uk keep up the good work.

Creditmince 17 Mar 2008, 11:49am

I agree in principle with 0% cards and I recently took advantage of the Virgin card option. Things were going very well for several months...by that I mean I was making the required payments each month that would mean my balance was cleared by the end of the 15 months. Then last month for some strange reason my payment took an extra day to arrive therefore making it 1 day late and virgin have withdrawn the 0% offer and charged me a late payment fee and interest.

I'm not complaining really as I know the rules they apply to these offers and it is lucky for me that I am able to clear the balance anyway. I considered for a short time making an application for another 0% card however I am still young and I need to re-mortgage later this year so I really don't want any credit applications that are not required on my record.

chaz25 17 Mar 2008, 12:52pm

Perhaps one day politicians, including Mr Duncan will wake up to the fact that it is only
credit that is allowing many people to pay their bills in this ever more expensive country with huge car fuel and tax costs, extremely expensive council tax, high taxation generally,dearest household energy costs in the world, rising food costs and most of all high housing costs whether rent or mortgage. Millions borrow on credit cards to keep up with their mortgage payments. Shame we don't have 0% mortgages!!!! No wonder politicians think ordinary people are bursting with money, NO we are bursting with debt. No 0% cards and we would be like America with its sub-prime debts. Comments like this by a senior politician are NOT helpful to those of us struggling to meet bills and keep a roof over our heads, let alone keep warm and clothed with food to eat!!!!!!!!

danni001 17 Mar 2008, 2:26pm

For every person who is responsible with their debt their is another who is nothing short of wreckless. It will be those people who have been careful who have to pay in the end, with higher interest rates and escalating fees. As we face the 'credit crunch' directly between the eyes we will be finding it harder and harder to live and be able to wipe out those debts when a lot of people will be taking advantage of the 0% offers with no intention of paying the lender back and only making the minimum payment each month. Ironically these are the people who have the best credit ratings as they are able to show that they pay their debts whilst those without debt who have lived frugally over the past boom years do not have much of a credit rating. I have always been of the opinion that debt is bad as you do not know what is around the corner and when you get into a debt crisis it is even harder to pull yourself out of a VERY deep hole, esp when there are IVA companies who are ready to feed on that misery, offering you a way out that will only lead you into further debt. We will just have to sit back and see what happens over the coming months, ride out the tough times and just do what we can.

chaz25 19 Mar 2008, 9:08pm

The point I am making is that MOST people cannot AVOID being in debt. Credit is NEEDED to meet everyday bills. Very FEW people can buy homes without a debt mortgage. Given that for most families debt is UNAVOIDABLE we need a LIFELINE - 0% credit cards. For people using debt for luxury items eg foreign holidays, expensive cars etc, 0% cards help immensely. For people improving their homes,borrowing is usually needed. As I said many people DEPEND on thier credit cards for their mortgage. Withdraw 0% cards and re-possessions will rise even more dramatically.......

madfraggle 19 Mar 2008, 9:52pm

chaz25 - Whilst I appreciate what you are saying, I think you are missing the point. I have been in similar situations (and have been bankrupt too). I have to say that defending the idea of paying the mortgage with a credit card seems very unFoolish to me... If you cannot pay a mortgage, don't buy your home. Thatcher pushed thousands of Britons into home ownership - on the continent relatively few people own their homes.
Debt is only unavoidable for families that are already in it ... and once in it IS extremely difficult to escape, which is where 0% cards come into their own - in helping you to reduce and then escape debt, not in running up more bills!

clairemcmoney 18 Sep 2008, 11:25am

I have just NEARLY been HORRIBLY MISLED into paying INTEREST on my MBNA credit card.
They wrote a letter offering me "0% on anything OVER £500 until August 2009". Wow. BUT THERE IS A CATCH! (I risk teaching granny foolsters to suck eggs here, and this may have been covered by someone on fool already , but anyway...) Yes. Anything OVER £500 is interest free for a year. But, if you buy something for £10, say, on that card, you will incur interest on it until you pay off the WHOLE balance (including your over-£500 purchases). Because if you send them a payment they will apply it to the LOWEST interest rate first. That means your £10 purchase languishes unpaid, accumulating interest, while £10 is knocked off your >£500 purchase.
I called MBNA because I checked the small print in my agreement. I though "they wouldn't be so ungracious, churlish, money-grabbing ... would they? Oh yes indeedy, foolsters. They are, as their representative said when I pointed out the potential to mislead, "not a charitable organisation". In fairness to MBNA the letter does state that they apply your payments to the lower rates first.
Nevertheless, BE CAREFUL OUT THERE. (What am I saying? You're reading this, aren't you?)

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.