Skip Navigation
 

Wave Goodbye To Cheques!

<%=_author %>

By

Emma Lunn

From the Fool blog

How To Bag A Bargain This Christmas

Published in Your Money on 26 September 2008

Cheques are becoming increasingly unpopular. But what will replace them? Emma Lunn thinks she knows...

Recently, while singing along to Noah and the Whale’s catchy hit ‘Five Years Time’, I got to thinking about what forms of payment will still be around in 2013. Will cheques be obsolete? Will credit cards be ancient history? Will we be able to pay for everything simply by waving our mobile phones over a sensor?

Ridiculous although it might seem now these are the ideas and predictions currently being floated around and even trialled in some cases.

Earlier this year, M&S announced that it would no longer accept cheques. From March it has only accepted cash or cards as payment for good in its stores. Other retailers to have banned cheque payments include Argos, Asda, Boots, WHSmith and Next.

This will make my fellow Fool Laura Starkey happy. She hates cheques.

And she’s not the only one. Personal cheque use has halved in the last 10 years and now cheques account for only 4% of retail spending, with debit/credit cards accounting for the lion’s share at 60%. However most banks still issue cheque books with new accounts, and cheques still come in handy from time to time. The elderly often prefer them and they can be useful for paying tradespeople.

A quick flick through my own cheque book stubs reveal I’ve only written about half a dozen cheques so far this year – for the service charge on my flat, to my accountant and to pay the plumber. All my bills are paid by direct debit – something utility companies encourage by offering discounts to people paying this way.

The Future

So what does the future hold for the humble cheque? I’d be surprised if it died out completely in the next five years but I think customers may soon have to ask their bank for a cheque book rather than being automatically given one.

Perhaps the cheque will remain on as a symbol, paraded around in oversized form on TV telethons as businesses proudly show off their charitable contributions, or handed to winning contestants on game shows?

The Next Big Thing

Contactless payment cards already look set to be the next big thing. Instead of being swiped, these cards are waved or tapped to make a payment.

Earlier this year Barclaycard launched the OnePulse three-in-one card which includes an Oyster card (for travel on London transport), a cashback credit card and a contactless payment card. The contactless element can be used for purchases under £10 in certain stores and users simply have to waive their card over a sensor.

Similarly Mastercard’s PayPass lets you pay for goods under £10 by simply tapping the card on the PayPass symbol at a checkout. When you see a green light and hear a beep, you’re done.

Some experts are predicting the death of the traditional credit card over the next five years. They say that that paying by plastic will make way for payments by mobile phone, key fob or even fingerprint.

It may seem far-fetched but it’s already happening elsewhere. In Japan they already have ‘wallet phones’ which can be used to pay for some purchases.

It’s been tried out in this country too. Telefónica O2 UK conducted a near-field communications (NFC) trial earlier this year. 500 people used a Nokia 6131 NFC phone to make retail purchases or pay for travel.

Those taking part in the trial could pay for travel on buses, trains, trams or the tube by swiping the NFC-enabled phones on standard Oyster travelcard readers. O2 have said it hopes to roll out this kind of payment form in time for the 2012 Olympic Games in London.

Whether this turns out to be the case or not remains to be seen but, in my opinion, contactless payments could well be the way forward.

What do you think?

> Compare credit cards at Fool.co.uk

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

ThatLindseyGuy 26 Sep 2008, 3:48pm

My two pence... cheques are only 'unpopular' with large corporations who'd rather not spend time and money processing millions of cheques every month, and with Visa and Mastercard who are trying to exploit this aversion in order to generate profits for themselves.

All fair enough. However, I'm sure cheques will continue to be fairly widely used as long as they remain the best way to make low-value person-to-person transactions, especially if the recipient is remote and you are unable/unwilling to exchange bank details.

The writer herself admits to having used half a dozen cheques this year - i.e. one every six weeks on average. I would argue that's often enough to warrant their survival.

ollybus 28 Sep 2008, 1:20pm

I love cheques - I use them as often as I can. I refuse to spend using store cards, credit/debit cards whenever I can. I have got into the habit of using one particular cash point to draw a fixed amount of money every week to cover for those times/places where I cannot use cheques. I have been doing this since chip and pin came along since I did not feel that the system was secure. I also do not like the idea that the government, corporations etc can extract my purchasing habits easily or locate my whereabouts through chip and pin. Since I have adopted this policy my finances have improved a great deal, since if I don't have the cash, and a cheque is unacceptable I don't buy!

slitemere 28 Sep 2008, 10:05pm

Ollybus, I like the idea of only taking out what you intend to spend each week. Unfortunately not all of us have a predictable amount of spending each week. I am a salesperson so I have to spend various sums on parking, meals, hotels etc. Would I be able to book my hotel room on-line unless I had a credit/debit card. I wish that my life were that simple.
I have written no more than 6 cheques in the last 4 years and I expect that to become less. Also as I use Smile bank which is an online only bank I have to find a postoffice and hand over any cheques in a special envelope. I Avoid cheques whenever possible.
I do believe that they are still a good way of paying tradespeople, but considering that I rent and never have to deal with such people it doesn't affect me either.
I think the only real concern is that all new forms of payment rely on technology and failure of that can causes delays or worse. As long as any new type of payment is thoroughly tested (unlike terminal 5 check in :o)) then for the sake of convenience we should give them a try.
As far as big brother watching you, that is I fear inevitable

fairmaid 29 Sep 2008, 7:47am

I previously only used my debit card when online or paying something over the phone. All other transactions I paid by cheque - mostly for the weekly shop or petrol. Now that I'm forced to use my debit card for these transactions, I hate all the small bits of paper I have to keep to track my spending. They are too easily lost! I don't like having my payment method to be dictated to me.

bugdc 29 Sep 2008, 8:40am

Also as I use Smile bank which is an online only bank I have to find a postoffice and hand over any cheques in a special envelope.

Not at all slitemere. Just pop it in any envelope in any postbox addressed to Smile, FREEPOST NEA 14877, Northampton, NN4 7BR (no stamp required, just a paying-in slip). Enormously convenient, and never any queue.

See their website http://www.smile.co.uk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=Smile/Page/smView&c=Page&cid=1026382580261for more details.

babeshamal 29 Sep 2008, 9:29am

Cheques and Standing Orders (remember them ?)mean that you are in precise control of what leaves your Account; direct debits do not!
I have several different Credit cards and pay each monthly by cheque.
Each is used for a different class of purchase (food, drink, travel, etc.)and this way I have the Issuers do my expenditure-analysis for me.

timnicholson 29 Sep 2008, 9:37am

I use cheques frequently to pay various small tradesmen who do not offer payment by credit/bank card for understandable reasons. Their only alternative would be to give me their bank details and accept an electronic transfer. For them that's giving out their financial identity and some people might not pay with all the hassle that would involve for them. The death of cheques is greatly exaggerated because banks find them tiresome and expensive to process.

Emma's article really says more about the death of cash. Small purchases of a few pounds are still most commonly executed in cash: an electronic purse is realy a substitute for cash not cheques. In the Netherlands, the ChipKnip scheme is widespread and effective allowing you to pay for parking and small purchases, like lunch in the work's canteen in my case. You need a Dutch bank account to use it properly topping up the card in special ATMs but even foreigners like me can buy pre-paid cards for 20 or 50 euros and use the system.

JoCat67 29 Sep 2008, 10:36am

I like cheques! I use the cheque stubs to keep a running total of what I spend, including online and cash withdrawals, as well as shopping where I now HAVE to pay by credit/debit card. It's annoying that stores I use frequently, like Sainsbury's & Marks and Spencer, no longer take cheques, but that's their prerogative.

I also often pay my credit cards by cheque. But as I can only use a few cheques a month, my scribbled calculations on the cheque stubs often overrun the cheques I have used and makes things more confusing.

I do online banking too to check what has gone into or come out of my account, but it's often a few days before transactions reach there, so my own calculations are more up to date.

gartons 29 Sep 2008, 10:58am

I am just about to have my home central heating system upgraded and have obtained several quotes for comparison.

Some firms will not accept payment by credit card whilst those that will accept a card apply a surcharge, these are not all small tradesmen and includes a number of large organisations.

As I am not prepared to pay a surcharge I am left with no alternative other than a cheque or cash.

As I see it, people like Laura Starkey who "hates cheques" and several other Fool writers live in a parallel universe which has no resemblance to the real world that most of us live in, or perhaps they are really just representing the financial "industry's" best interests.

I am not against change and take note of the Fool's advice on many occasions but, be warned, at the end of the day, if the banks think it is a good idea to do away with cheques then it has got to be a bad idea for us, the customer.

meita 29 Sep 2008, 1:26pm

I have never paid by cheque in my life. Honestly, I wouldn't know how.

Returning to the UK as an adult, I was completely surprised by the prevalence of cheques. Cheques have been reduced to the ritual role suggested in the article (prize giving ceremonies etc.) in Europe years ago. I have never heard anyone say they missed them.

The few times I received money by cheques were pure inconvenience. At best, it means I have to take the cheque somewhere (at least to a letter box, or to a bank) and then wait several days for the money to actually appear on my account and be available. At worst, it meant I had to open a new bank account (which isn't usually done in 5 minutes), and in another case, had to send the cheque back and insist on another form of payment. In any case, there are delays.

Maybe it is a generational thing. People who grow up without cheques will never miss them.

shuck 29 Sep 2008, 1:41pm

Also as I use Smile bank which is an online only bank I have to find a postoffice and hand over any cheques in a special envelope.

You make this sound like a minus, but this is one of the many reasons I use smile. Despite the Royal Mail's best efforts, finding a post office is still easier than a bank branch.

If you don't need cheques, the Coventry First account is a good current account, but you don't get a cheque book, instead you get cheques from a branch. Most of my cheques are only for a few pounds, and it's not worth the effort of going to a branch to get a cheque written out.

MrStatto 29 Sep 2008, 7:38pm

As the Treasurer for a charity pre-school, cheques are absolutely vital. A lot of people aren't happy paying their fees (up to £500 a term) in cash, so there's very little alternative to a cheque.

billp13 29 Sep 2008, 8:30pm

What about the times you want to transfer some money to a friend or aquaintence or to a small organisation like a badminton club to pay for annual fees? The cheque is really the only way to do this. If there is another way other than walking around with loads of cash please let me know.

thinking108 29 Sep 2008, 9:21pm

Seem to feel here, as though I'm the only parent of a child in the state system. No paying once a term to cover everything required in one go. I generally pay by cheque rather than send cash with my child (hate to put the responsibility on an 8 year old) to pay for music lessons, trips, swimming, 'voluntary' contributions, lunches, uniform, sports groups as and when this is requested or invoiced. So yes most of my cheques are to just a few people or organisations but I can't see this need changing just yet.

atseyes 29 Sep 2008, 11:10pm

"if the banks think it is a good idea to do away with cheques then it has got to be a bad idea for us, the customer."

Personally. I'd add large companies to that comment. Okay, I am a satisfied customer of both ASDA and Tesco, who have both stopped accepting cheques, but it's their profit and convenience they are most interested in. Do not forget, these days, the primary purpose of any business is to make a profit. Providing goods or services of any sort to their customers is how they make that profit.

carolewillis1 30 Sep 2008, 11:33am

I prefer cheques or Standing Orders as you are in complete control of your finances unlike Direct Debits. Also, I do not like to be told how to pay for goods/services. Long live cheques and Standing Orders!

gordonbanks42 01 Oct 2008, 11:49pm

Please please please don't make me use my phone as a payment device! I love technology and I am a keen user of mobile phones, PDAs and all that, but I have never found one that didn't have pretty shocking bugs in it. Fine if all that means is that it won't dial until you switch it off and on again. But to trust it with paying real money out of my own bank account? I don't think so . . . at least not until a few more (wo)man-centuries of development effort has gone into refining phone software beyond all recognition.

gordonbanks42 02 Oct 2008, 12:01am

Personally I am happy to pay by whatever means is cheapest for the other party, provided it's reasonably convenient for me and reasonably secure (and I'm not in one of my moods with them). Reducing the costs of the businesses I buy from will either make their prices go down or my shares in them go up.

I have had one or two eye-opening experiences that left me with little confidence in the security of cheques. Is it really that easy to copy a signature so accurately? After just a quick glance? Well, seems it is after all. Give me a (slightly dodgy) chip and pin credit/debit card system or online banking with SSL as a preferable alternative any day.

One thing that might make accepting payment online rather more palatable for individuals, clubs and tradesmen would be if there were a system of aliasing so that people could pay into your alias account details and it would go to the "real" account. But there would, we suppose, be no way to identify the "real" account from the alias info or to attempt withdrawals etc. using the alias info alone - just as there is no way to send spam to my email inbox by knowing that my TMF handle is gordonbanks42.

Also we need better "reference" info on online payments to help with reconciliations.

I am sure all that is technologically feasible, perhaps even easy.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.