Skip Navigation
 

Your Chance Of Winning A Million

<%=_author %>

By

Harvey Jones

From the Fool blog

Christmas comes early for Centrica investors

Published in Your Money on 22 August 2008

Harvey Jones looks at the odds of winning a million from various games of chance.

The new football season has seen the relaunch and rebranding of a venerable 85-year old pursuit – the Pools.

Littlewoods, Vernons and Zetters have been moulded into a single new entity, the New Football Pools, owned by Sportech, which has kicked off with a £5.5 million marketing campaign.

I'm no fan of gaming, but I do have a soft spot for the Pools, because I fondly remember my father and I filling in the coupon every Thursday evening back in the late 1970s. I think we once won £57.

Everybody dreams of winning a million, but what are the chances of it happening to you?

Inevitably, the answer is pretty slim, but the odds do vary depending on where you chance your luck.

It's a Lottery.

The National Lottery has created more than 2,100 millionaires or multi-millionaires since launch in November 1994. For every £1 spent on tickets, it pays out 50p to players in prizes.

Don't get too excited, because each £1 ticket gives you a one in 14 million chance of hitting the jackpot. But that doesn't stop 70% of the population from trying on a regular basis.

Those odds look thin, but you can prove anything with statistics, so try this: one in 9,423 players has now won a share of a National Lottery jackpot (including through clubs or syndicates). Do you feel lucky?

Your chances of picking up a smaller prize from scratch cards to prize draws are naturally much higher, but that won't change your life in the way winning a million would.

Bonds. Premium Bonds.

Premium Bonds, run by National Savings & Investments, was launched in 1957 with a top prize of £1,000, the equivalent of £16,729 today, enough to buy a brand new Morris Minor.

Premium Bonds slowly upped its prize money and hit the million mark in 1994.

Some 23 million people hold Premium Bonds -- 40% of the population. Ernie has now made more than 216 people millionaires and creates another two every month.

Each bond costs £1, although the minimum stake is £100. For each £1 unit your chances of winning a prize (the lowest is £50) are fixed at one in 22,000. If your stake is £100, you have a one in 220 chance. In August, Ernie dished out 1.6 million prizes.

But what are the odds of winning a million? The answer depends on how many bonds you hold. For each £1 bond, you have a one in 18.3 billion chance. If you hold £100 of bonds, that falls to one in 183 million, and if you hold £1,000, to one in 18.3 million.

At first sight, that compares poorly to the Lottery, where £1 gives you a one in 14 million chance and £1,000 a one in 14,000 chance, but there is a key difference. Your Premium Bonds go back into the draw month after month, year after year, and you can get your money back at any time. Not so your Lottery ticket. Oh, and unlike the Lottery, there is no time limit to claim your prize.

The key figure is the prize fund rate, currently set at a tax-free 3.4%. That is worth 5.67% to a higher-rate taxpayer and 4.25% to a basic rate taxpayer, which compares reasonably well to best-buy savings accounts, which currently pay around 6%.

Is that your final answer?

Littlewoods Football Pools was founded in 1923 and paid out its first million in 1986, the biggest ever prize in any British competition at the time. Since then, it has created more than 100 millionaires.

At its peak, more than one-third of the population played the Pools every week, but the Lottery changed all that. But it still attracts around 750,000 players, and many more play spin-off games such as Footy 15 or Premier 10.

The New Football Pools offers a maximum jackpot of £3 million. There are so many variables, such as results and the number of players, that the Pools refuses to quote your chances of winning the jackpot.

But a few years ago, a Cambridge mathematician called Dr Oliver Johnson worked out the odds of a £10 bet winning a million in different forms of gaming.

The Lottery came in fourth place, with £10 giving you a one in 1.4 million chance. The Pools came third with a one in 639,685 chance, while sports betting came second with odds of one in 247,596.

And the winner? National Bingo, which links hundreds of bingo clubs across the country twice daily. It's odds of making a million are one in 200,000.

Dr Johnson didn't calculate the odds of winning big on the Premium Bonds, but he did include TV show Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. The odds were lowest of all at one in 1.5 million.

The odds of a big win may be poor, but tens of thousands of people have been made millionaires over the years, and who knows, one of them could be...

More: A Safe Lottery

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

DrFfybes 22 Aug 2008, 1:03pm

The National Lottery has created more than 2,100 millionaires or multi-millionaires since launch in November 1994.

Does that 2100 include the National Lotteries regular big winners - the Camelot directors such as Dianne Thompson who gets just shy of £1 million/year (plus pension)?

axeman101 22 Aug 2008, 1:21pm

Thats right about the lottery syndicate wins. One in four of the lottery winners are in a syndicate ( I read somewhere ). I joined an online syndicate and although I haven't won the big un ( yet ) I've won lots of small prizes which is mounting up. www.betlott.com

Get paid more as well. Last Wed 20th the National Lottery paid the normal £10 for 3 numbers...the syndicate paid out £15.65.

Looking forward to these week-end rollovers !

gillianswain 25 Aug 2008, 7:18am

When the National Lottery started someone calculated the odds of winning the "big-one" and discovered that there were less days since the birth of Jesus than chances of winning the lottery. Having said that I know of a family who almost won the big one and got a large payout. They have used the money for their childrens education, a home extension, holidays etc. The sexond couple I know of shared £2 million as winners of the big prize but they are now divorced thus not all winners are going to live happy ever after lives. However, as Tevye sing to God in the musical "Fiddler on the Roof" ....would it be so bad if I had just a "small fortune".

reg105 25 Aug 2008, 9:54am

The National Lottery - it's a tax on stupidity.

Accountantsmum 25 Aug 2008, 11:12am

If you look at the National Lottery with the eyes of a gambler, you'd be silly to touch it. The odds are lousy compared to the prizes. But most people who buy lottery tickets, including me, don't look at it like that. The ticket price is a spend, not a stake: and what you buy is a dream. Most people don't, in their heart of hearts, expect to win: but they buy a possibility, no more. Don't forget that every lottery millionaire bought a ticket: and not one of them would think they were foolish to do so!

jrh27 25 Aug 2008, 4:50pm

Quote - "For each £1 bond, you have a one in 18.3 billion chance. ... At first sight, that compares poorly to the Lottery, where £1 gives you a one in 14 million chance and
£1,000 a one in 14,000 chance, but there is a key difference. Your Premium Bonds go
back into the draw month after month, year after year, and you can get your money back
at any time. Not so your Lottery ticket."

There's a misconception here. Premium bonds are a lottery just like any other. You stake some money, and if you don't win then you lose your stake. When you buy a premium bond, you lend the government £1, and every month you bet the notional interest on that £1. If the annual notional interest is 3%, say, then every month you are gambling about a quarter of a penny.

If you go to the National Lottery and ask them to give you your £1 stake back, they will tell you to take a hike. And you'll get the same response if you go to the government and ask for your quarter of a penny back. Of course, the government will give you your £1 back, but that's nothing to do with the case. You didn't gamble the £1.

7of9sLovechild 25 Aug 2008, 6:38pm

I'm missing the point jrh27. If I spend £100 on the lottery in a year and win nothing I have nothing. If I Spend £100 on the premium bonds and win nothing I still have £100 (minus inflation).

Yes I know that Premium bonds only pay out a small percentage of the income they make from investing our 'stakes', and I could do better with a high interest savings account, but we are talking about a gamble, a bit of fun. Let's face it you wont ever get £1M from investing your £100 in 'Safeashouses BS' (lets not go there!!). Camelot are not in the lottery game out of some desire to make US rich. I know where I would rather 'gamble' my £100.

BTW, I own premium bonds, and 'invest' in the lottery too. Shame on me. ;-)

jrh27 26 Aug 2008, 1:40am

I'm missing the point jrh27. If I spend £100 on the lottery in a year and win nothing I have nothing. If I Spend £100 on the premium bonds and win nothing I still have £100 (minus inflation).

Yes, you do have the £100 left in the case of the Premium Bonds. The reason is that you didn’t gamble the £100. You gambled only the interest on the £100, which is something like £3. And you lost that £3. In the case of the Lottery, you really did gamble the £100, so that’s how much you lost. In both cases, you lost the amount that you gambled.

I have no problem with either of these forms of gambling. If people want to do that, and have a bit of fun, fine. I’ve got a few thousand Premium Bonds myself (costly fun - I’ve never won anything). My point is simply that anybody who says you can’t lose your stake on Premium Bonds either doesn’t understand what’s happening or is lying. And when it’s the government telling you that you can’t lose your stake, it’s either lying or lying.

Actually, Premium Bonds are probably a slightly better deal than the Lottery, though they are both outrageous rip-offs if your only concern is the return on your ‘investment’.

With Premium Bonds you get a prize fund based on a notional interest rate of about 3%. If you had invested your money elsewhere, you might have got, say, 5%. In effect therefore, your expected return is 3/5, or 60%. You bet £1, you get 60p back on average.

With the Lottery, 50% of the stake money goes into the prize fund. So you bet £1, you get 50p back on average.

Both these outfits are put to shame by your local casino. Go there and bet £1 on roulette, and you’ll get 97p back on average.

eaterofcarob 26 Aug 2008, 11:28pm

Premium Bonds are good for me. I don't do the National Lottery as the wife thinks it's a waste. I end up, from time to time, with too much money in my current account (poor me) and since my bank have decided not to pay hardly any interest on amounts over £2500, rather than just having it sit there until I decide what to do with it, it's so easy to buy PBs and I can get it back when I want. And who knows. I might bag the big one. I could put extra cash my SIPP, but then it's also a punt on the Stock Market with 5 years to go until retirement (I hope). And I can't get hold of it if I need it. Has anyone got a better short term home for a higher rate taxpayer?

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.