Skip Navigation
 

How Much Is Your Wage Really Worth?

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

Christmas comes early for Centrica investors

Published in Your Money on 4 July 2008

When you weigh up the value of your existing job or a new one, remember to take these valuable benefits into account!

Earlier this week, I was suffering from an acute form of ‘package envy’. Ooh err!

This happened when I compared the meagre benefits I receive to those my wife’s employer deals out. As a freelance writer, I have set up a private limited company to manage my affairs. My company pays me a very modest salary, which is boosted by irregular dividends.

On the other hand, my wife works for a massive global company which makes billions each year. Hence, as a leader in its field, this multi-national company can afford to offer generous benefits to its employees. In order to demonstrate just how valuable these extra benefits are, my wife’s employer sends out an annual ‘reward report’ to its employees.

Indeed, by my reckoning, these extras add perhaps four-fifths (80%) to my wife’s basic salary. So, when placing a value on your existing job, or a potential employment opportunity, do take the following extras into account (in alphabetical order):

Basic salary

When it comes to valuing a position, the basic salary should be your entry-level benchmark. Also, when negotiating a better package, most people focus on salary. What’s more, your basic salary is important when you apply for mortgages and other credit.

Bonus

Although multi-million-pound bonuses are paid to top City players, most bonus schemes are far more modest. Typically, you may earn between 10% and 30% of your salary on a performance-related basis. In most cases, what you receive will depend on your own performance and the company’s financial success.

Car (or car allowance)

Having a company car (or the cash equivalent) is another valuable benefit. Which vehicle you receive usually depends on your seniority and your expected mileage. With fuel prices hitting record highs, having your personal fuel bill paid for you is another bonus. However, as with most benefits in kind, you pay tax on your company car, based on its value and CO2 emissions.

Childcare support

For working parents, childcare support is a terrific help. For example, my wife’s company gives her tax-free childcare vouchers worth £55 a week, saving her almost £100 a month in tax and National Insurance contributions. In addition, it provides an emergency-nanny service for employees, plus a holiday play-scheme which costs half as much as profit-making ventures. Some generous employers even go so far as to provide an on-site crèche for employees’ offspring.

Dental insurance

These days, it’s incredibly hard for adults to find an NHS dentist. Hence, it’s very handy if your employer provides dental cover, as you’re unlikely to find a cheaper individual plan. Even better, some firms pay your premium, so you pay only the tax on this benefit.

Employee assistance programme

Often, working life can get stressful, which is bad news for both employers and employees. Thus, enlightened employers offer impartial, independent counselling services from the likes of EAR, the Employee Advisory Resource. These services prove a valuable lifeline when times are tough.

Holiday pay

Everybody, even the most hardened workaholic, needs to take a break now and then. Although four weeks’ paid holiday is the norm, some firms offer five or more weeks of vacation time. In fact, after forty years at the same organisation, my father now gets eight weeks’ time off each year!

Income protection

Income protection is an insurance policy which pays out monthly benefits if you are unable to work following an accident or injury. This type of long-term protection is both expensive and complicated to buy, so getting it from your employer is a big plus.

Life insurance (‘death in service’ cover)

Likewise, buying life insurance can be complex and costly, so let your employer take the strain. Typically, an employer will provide life cover of three or four times your basic salary.

Pension

A generous employer-sponsored pension scheme is worth its weight in gold. Alas, the ‘gold standard’ for occupational pensions, the guaranteed final-salary scheme, is now dying out. My wife is lucky enough to be a member of a final-salary scheme, yet she pays only 3% of the 25%+ it costs to fund this benefit! Hence, it is crucial to find out about pension provision before joining an organisation.

Private medical insurance (PMI)

Around six million people in the UK are covered by private medical insurance, the leading provider of which is BUPA. This cover enables them to dodge NHS waiting lists, get quick treatment for minor conditions, while enjoying a private room and decent hospital food. Again, PMI is expensive and difficult to buy individually, so do join your employer’s scheme.

Sharesave (alias Save As You Earn, or SAYE)

As I explained in Ten Ways To Win With Shares, Sharesave is a great way to buy shares in your employer at a discount. Around 2½ million employees of listed companies use SAYE to save between £5 and £250 a month and then buy shares at a discount of up to a fifth (20%) off the market price.

Share options

As part of her long-term incentive plan, Mrs D’Arcy receives free share options in her company. These give her the right, but not the obligation, to buy shares at a fixed price after three to ten years. When her employer’s share price has risen strongly, these have proved hugely profitable. Alas, in this market downturn, her latest batch of share options is a busted flush for now!

Sick pay

As I run my own company, being off sick could be a real pain (pun intended). However, as I work from home, I’d have to be very ill not to be able to write. However, were I to look for another job, then I’d make sure that my new employer provided sick pay for at least one month and, ideally, at least three months.

Share incentive plans (SIPs)

Finally, share incentive plans allow companies to give their employees free shares worth up to £3,000 each year. Other SIPs allow employees to invest up to £1,500 a year of their pre-tax income into shares, and even enjoy ‘buy one, get two free’ deals. For example, my wife’s ‘buy one, get one free’ plan enables her to buy £3,000 of shares for just £885 a year. Nice!

In summary, when weighing up a job, always look beyond the basic salary. Any cash, lifestyle, protection and investment benefits on offer can dramatically bump up the value of your package. So, don’t forget to take them into account, or you may lose out.

More: Find quality quotes for insurance via the Fool | A New Way To Boost Your Pension | Money-Saving Tips For Real People

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

onlyroz 04 Jul 2008, 11:02am

If you're a woman, also look at the maternity policy (although it might not be an idea to ask about it in the interview - a private call to HR should be enough to find out what you need). My company offers a BUPA dental plan, AXA medical insurance, travel insurance and 4 x salary life cover, but has an abysmal maternity policy.

When I go on maternity leave in January, I'll be on a quarter of my current salary, which isn't enough to pay half the mortgage, let alone nursery fees for my first-born, and all the other bills. Some enlightened employers offer full salary for 6 months, which is a *big* plus - because for high fliers, statutory maternity pay will not go very far...

ruisliprabbitt 04 Jul 2008, 1:36pm

Hold on a moment!

Ignoring the fact that companies are OBLIGED to pay maternity pay, why should companies pay anything to people who are not contributing to the firm's business?

You seem to think you are being hard done by.

If you have children then you need to think through the financial aspects carefully and comprehensively before the act is done. If you were relying on better benefits than you will receive then you should have done your homework.

You have no sympathy from RR.

onlyroz 04 Jul 2008, 10:15pm

I didn't say that I felt hard done by - I was just pointing out that a company's maternity policy might be relevant in whether you accept a job or not. After all, the article was about contractual benefits, and maternity pay beyond the statutory minimum is a contractual benefit.

Yes, I have done my homework, and yes we can afford my pay cut - I was just pointing out that while my company offers very good benefits on the whole, their maternity policy is not as good as it could be.

CunningCliff 05 Jul 2008, 6:34pm

An excellent idea, onlyroz. Expect a follow-up article on maternity pay. Thanks! :0)

Cliff

PS: ruisliprabbitt, your post comes across an unnecessarily harsh. Was this your intention? If so, I'm happy to remove it.

Hockeystickchick 06 Jul 2008, 8:33am

Hi
I just wanted to add that I agree with onlyroz, maternity package is a key benefit for both sexes. It is also one shrouded in mystery until you join the company. I am with a large corporate and they have an excellent package generally, and fortunately maternity is not too bad, 16 weeks at full pay, 6 weeks at 90% and then the remaining time at the statutory limit, £108 a week.
However trying to navigate my way through company intranets and then being referred to various paperwork to try and work out the actual figures I'll be paid wasnt possible until after I made the announcement to my boss.
My husband is able to take 4 weeks full pay as paternity leave at his company, which we are both very greatful for.
HSC

gillianswain 06 Jul 2008, 11:17am

I worked for my company for about 20 years and was then made self-employed much against my wishes. I don't get holiday pay, sick pay, pension, redundancy or any insurance of any kind and after 20 years you are older so don't stand much of a chance of getting another job except as a self-employed person and you don't get much choice in decisions that are made either. If you have all the other perks I think that you are really lucky.

MCMXCIX 06 Jul 2008, 8:25pm

I agree with both onlyroz and ruisliprabbitt.

Having assessed male and female applicants for a position, there should be no reason for employers to have to think again about the applicant's age and sex when taking on a new member of staff. (Yes, I agree, this is not a big issue for large companies, but it is a big issue for small companies).

At the same time, having found an excellent company to work for, there should be no reason for a female job applicant to have to withdraw her application as soon as she discovers (from HR or otherwise) that the company offers poor maternity benefits.

I really don't go along with this idea that getting pregnant should be seen as an "economic choice with economic consequences".

Solution: 1) Maternity leave and paternity leave both to be paid not by companies but by the state out of the public purse. 2) Men to get as much time off as women.

Result: The baby benefits from more parental attention. The company does not have to pay workers who are not contributing to the bottom line. Female applicants who are more competent don't get passed over in favour of male applicants by small companies which can't afford maternity leave. Taxes get spent on something meaningful which makes a real difference to people's lives (both young parents and the baby). As a bonus, we start to sort out the inverted demographic pyramid which is leading to a pensions black hole.

Right now we seem to live in a culture where only celebrities (Charlotte Church, Sophie Ellis Bextor etc.) can afford to be able to have families when they are in their early twenties. This is getting worse, not better.

I wonder, can we stop stigmatising getting pregnant and taking maternity leave as an ill-advised economic choice, spurned by high-flying careerists and start seeing it as an entirely normal state of affairs for parents of both sexes and one to be welcomed - even if it happens early in an individual's career?

Perhaps then, an excellent maternity policy will no longer be seen as "a good perk" but as a justified entitlement to expecting parents.

ejJ2007 07 Jul 2008, 12:45pm

Having children is surely becoming a luxury that only rich people, and those on benefits can afford!?

It seems that too many people are unaware that todays financial climate forces both parents to work to keep the wolf from the door, what happens when the unexpected occurs? I found myself "unexpectedly expecting" last year, it was a big shock but we decided against termination after much agonising and soul searching.

I took 4 months Maternity Leave which was paid at the basic statutory rate - ie 6 weeks at 90% then the rest at £108 a week. As a result, not only did I have to come back full time when the baby was only 3 months old, but now, with enormous nursery bills to pay, we are sinking deeper into debt every month it seems. It also means that my older children also have to go without treats a lot of the time. I wish there was more incentive for employers to help employees with childcare, as it is hard to do a good job at work, when you are constantly worrying about money.

We don't expect handouts, but £108 a week is considerably less than you would receive if you were on benefits, is this what we get for paying a lifetime of NI contributions? Also, as far as I am aware the government refunds employers the basic maternity rate anyway.

The company I work for is very supportive of family commitments, and allows flexibility of hours, where possible, if you need time out to look after dependants, they also run the Childcare Vouchers Scheme. I am sure if there were more schemes out there then it would adopt them straight away.

Currently I work in the office all day, housework all evening, and get about 10 pence a week after the nursery gets paid, my only comfort is that as long as I keep it up eventually the baby will go to school which is free! The only problem with that is that by then I will be getting fleeced to help my eldest through university!!! I am considering taking up busking in my "spare" time!!!!

smooge 07 Jul 2008, 2:32pm

Good for you, to those who have fringe benefits, and very good luck to those who haven't.
Responding to ejJ2007 - we were neither rich not on any benefits (except Child benefit, of course).
I am somewhat mystified by the economic debate about children; you have them or you don't. Mine are now 22, 23, 26, and 28 - all boys BTW - and I own up right now to the old-fashioned attitude passed down to me that you don't buy anything until you can afford it (I made an exception with the mortgage in 1977, have been mortgage-free since 1992 and saving has always been high on my list of priorities).
The economic climate has changed since the late 70s early 80s but we subsisted on one very-much-below-average wage and we had a fortnight's holiday in a caravan once a year, during which I spent no more than in an average fortnight's money on housekeeping. I expect the fact that I was brought up post-war led me to expect less so material goods have always taken second-fiddle over fresh air and growing my own veg.
I feel the REAL benefit of my NOT working, both to me and the kids is that we were all together enjoying each others' company and sharing our values during post-meal conversations - 21 times a week. Can't put a price on that, IMHO, and I don't mean to sound smug or to offer any criticism of anyone who makes a different choice. It just worked for us.
Now back at work, I get 5% contribution to my pension from my employer, a voluntary organisation that cannot afford anything else, unfortunately.
Fool on.
Smooge :)

SannaLar 07 Jul 2008, 4:26pm

MCMXCIX - Couldn't have said it better myself. This country is so far behind the rest of Europe in this respect it's a disgrace.

onlyroz 07 Jul 2008, 9:43pm

Seems I started a bit of a debate on company maternity policy. My own viewpoint is that if we make it unnecessarily difficult for professional women to have children then we'll just stop - and where will that leave the country, if the only people left having kids are those that live off the state?

I'm in whole-hearted agreement that it should be possible to split parental leave between both the mother and the father. This would go a long way towards companies discriminating against female employees, or making a recruitment decision based upon how likely they think a woman is to have a baby in the near future. I believe the legislation is due to come into effect in 2010, but the current proposal is to only allow fathers to take the additional leave after 6 months. Not good enough, I'm afraid, Mr Brown.

gwiwer 05 Aug 2008, 2:10am

Personally, although I have no children myself, I MUCH prefer to work in an environment where I have a lively mix of colleagues who have *lives* outside work - and that has to include parents. I'd hate to work somewhere where everybody was exactly the same as me - how boring!

Good maternity/paternity leave benefits are a good indicator that the company realises that its employees are human beings. I just don't want to work for an employer who has difficulty with that concept.

And paying money out to people who aren't *currently* contributing to the firm's bottom line is a fairly standard part of employment packages - enhanced sick pay, anyone? Enhanced redundancy pay? Paid annual leave above the absolute minimum? Employer-funded income protection or life insurance (hard to contribute when you're dead, you know)? Paid leave to attend training? Paid sabbaticals? Unpaid sabbaticals where the company has to pay to cover your job while you gad around the world for a few months? Totally standard for professional employees (though you might not get every one, I bet most employees get at least some of those). Why is it only maternity pay that seems to trigger moral judgements?

Anyway, back to the original point of the article - if you are lucky enough to get any of the benefits described, then it's worth calculating their value. It may well cost the company less to give you some of these than to give you more pay - but it's the value to you that you need to think of. Especially if you work for a company that's stingy on basic pay, but generous with allowances - if you move jobs, then given that most offers consider your existing salary it really helps to be able to put a value on your current benefits to point out that actually, the total package is more than it first seems - then you can try to negotiate from that baseline, instead of your basic pay. It's funny what a difference an actual figure makes to people's minds. And sometimes, you may realise that you're actually better off staying where you are.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.