Skip Navigation
 

A Stronger Safety-Net For Savers

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

The Right Financial Decision

Published in Your Money on 4 July 2008

The government is proposing to raise -- and speed up --the compensation paid out when banks bomb. This is great news for savers!

This article was originally sent to Fools as an email in our 'Summer Lolly' series.

After the near-collapse of Northern Rock last September, followed by its nationalisation in February, the government is desperate to boost public confidence in banks. Hence, the chancellor, Alistair Darling, has published a proposal to increase the amount of compensation paid to savers if a savings institution fails.

From £35,000 to £50,000, with faster payouts

At present, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) protects only the first £35,000 of savings held with any single institution. For joint accounts, this limit is doubled to £70,000. The chancellor proposes increasing this limit to £50,000, and £100,000 for joint accounts. There will be a consultation period regarding this proposal lasting until September. Therefore, a stronger safety-net for savings should be introduced in late 2008 or early 2009.

Thanks to the ongoing credit crunch, banks are short of ready cash. Thus, they were reluctant to hand over large sums in order to underpin the FSCS, as this would further reduce banks’ liquidity. The good news for banks is that this extra protection may not require upfront funding. Instead, problems at one savings institution will trigger a cash call on other banks.

Another suggested improvement is to speed up the length of time it takes for the FSCS to compensate savers. At present, it could take several months before savers receive their payouts. Under the new regime, emergency payments may be made within seven days, with the remainder handed over shortly afterwards.

These measures will undoubtedly improve public confidence, but there will still be losers. Although £50,000 pounds is a huge sum to most of us, some people -- especially older savers -- have far more than this. Hence, a significant number of rich and elderly savers could still lose a proportion of their life savings under the new regime.

Playing it ultra-safe

It’s important to note that the current £35,000 limit applies to savings with a single institution. Thus, by spreading your savings between different banks, you can make sure that you never have more than £35,000 with any single bank. Then again, banks usually trade under various different brands, so you need to be sure with which organisation you’re dealing. In this article, we list eight major banking groups with separate banking registrations.

Alternatively, you can dump all of your savings with Northern Rock, as 100% of its deposits are underpinned by ‘the full faith and credit’ of the British government. The same protection applies to all sums deposited with National Savings & Investments (NS&I), the government’s very own piggy-bank.

In summary, if you have savings in excess of £35,000, you can gain extra peace of mind by dividing your rainy-day money, nest egg or life savings between high-interest savings accounts with different banks. Some people may regard this as being overly cautious, but it will help well-off savers to sleep more easily.

Compare savings via Fool.co.uk

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

fop10 07 Jul 2008, 11:38pm

this may sound like a foolish question but why wouldnt well off savers deposit their savings in a national savings account when there is no limit to the capital guarantee versus £35k from a bank ? is it a question of ordinary interest rates ?

markmortadviser 17 Sep 2008, 2:59pm

NS&I rates are very poor at the moment. Around 4.4% compared to 6.8% for the best with a £35k guarantee & 6.4% at Northern Rock.

bindylou 17 Sep 2008, 5:49pm

Someone recently told me that although Post Office savings rates are better you are not covered by the £35,000 guarantee because they are provided by the Bank of Ireland, is this true?

PRMARJORAM 18 Sep 2008, 10:20am

What if you have large sums of money invested through an Index Tracker say with Legal & General. If L&G was to get into trouble - what would happen in this kind of scenario to its savers?

SaidRich 28 Sep 2008, 10:03pm

Of course one needs to check the Rate offered by banks and building societies- AFTER Tax- before comparing with NS&I, who sometimes but not always offer rates well below banks and building societies, and to the extent that one might deduce the state has already taken the tax element before-hand, such that the TAX FREE rates are in reallity bogus.Depends upon your Tax status of course.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.