Skip Navigation

Should You Ditch Your Endowment?

<%=this._contentDocument.Byline%>
By Jane Baker | 2 May 2008

Sadly many homeowners were advised to take out endowment mortgages back in the 80s and for many borrowers, that decision has proved to be an expensive mistake.

And a recent survey shows that the situation has got even worse for endowment policyholders. Those of you who have with-profits endowments may be alarmed to hear the vast majority of 25 year policies maturing now are producing lower returns than they did last year and the year before that*.

In fact, a recent survey by Money Management magazine reveals the worst-performing endowment policy returned a pitiful 3.9% a year for the last 25 years, falling short of the interest you would have earned on many standard savings accounts.

So should you ditch your endowment or stick with it? It's not an easy choice, but here are some points you should think about before you decide whether the time has come for you and your endowment to part ways. (Of course, not all endowment policies are linked to mortgages.)

Do you still need the endowment?

Is the policy being used to repay your mortgage? And, do you still need the life insurance that's built in? If so, you'll need to think twice before ditching it.

If your endowment is likely to fall short of its target, it may make sense to switch over to a repayment mortgage instead. In that case, you won't need the policy and you could possibly use the proceeds to pay off some of your mortgage early.

If you decide to surrender (cash in) your policy, you may need to arrange life insurance elsewhere. Getting cover can be expensive if you're a little older or you have health problems, so remember to take that into account.

Calculate a possible maturity value for your endowment

Much of your decision depends on how you think your policy might perform from now on. Returns from with-profits endowments are paid in the form of an annual and possibly a terminal - or final - bonus. Bonus rates are set each year at the discretion of the provider.

But that means it's difficult to estimate future growth as you don't know what bonuses will be declared in the coming years. You need to think about the potential value of your policy at maturity if you were to keep it.

The projections you receive from your provider are pretty useless for that, as they bear no relation to the level of bonus you might receive. Some of the worst-performing with-profits funds, for example, are currently paying bonus rates of 0%, whereas most projections are based around 6%.

To work out an estimate for a maturity value, ask your provider for the following information:

  • The last three year's annual bonus rates.
  • The current maturity value of policies which ran for the same term as your policy, but are maturing now.
  • The terminal bonus, if any, on similar maturing policies. 

This information should give you a rough idea of the prospects for your policy going forward (although remember, as always, past performance isn't a guide to the future). If the last three year's bonuses have been 0% and maturity values including any terminal bonus are low, it's a reasonable assumption that your policy may not fare well either.

If you're good at number crunching, you can ‘guesstimate' how your endowment might grow to maturity based on a range of different assumed growth rates, as well as the bonus rate history and a range of estimated terminal bonuses.

Once you've got those figures, compare them with the value that would be achieved if you cashed in your endowment now and placed the surrender value - that's the amount you receive when you cash it in - in a savings account that pays say, 6% a year for the remainder of the policy term. This should give you an idea whether cashing in the policy now is a good move from a performance perspective.

If you don't feel confident doing your own calculations, it's best to take advice from an independent financial adviser and ask them to do the hard work for you.

Look at the Equity Backing Ratio (EBR)

That's just a fancy way of saying how much of your endowment is invested in shares. Your provider will be able to give you the EBR. If your endowment has a low exposure to shares, then the prospects for future growth could be pretty limited, and it may be time to think about surrendering it.

If you have a policy which is no longer sold to new customers, pay close attention to its underlying assets. Many of these so-called ‘closed funds' have little or no investment in shares. Meanwhile, a stronger endowment might have an EBR between 50% and 70%.

Is there a Market Value Reduction (MVR)?

The MVR is like a withdrawal penalty that may come into play if you choose to surrender your endowment early.

In simple terms, with-profits investments have come unstuck where the provider has paid out past bonuses which later turned out to be too generous. That means, the bonuses paid to investors were higher than the actual returns achieved by the with-profits fund itself.

Where this has happened, the provider may try to claw some of it back by applying an MVR on early encashment. An MVR can take a huge bite out of your surrender value. If this affects your policy, it may be worth sticking with it until the penalty is removed or is, at least, reduced. MVRs aren't always deducted, so check that out with your provider first.

That covers the key points to think about before you surrender. In a follow up article, I'll look at the benefits of selling your policy though the TEP (traded endowment policy) market, as an alternative to cashing it in or keeping it in place.

And on a final note, I would suggest if you're still unsure what to do with your endowment, it's important to speak to an independent financial adviser.

*According to a recent survey by Investment, Life & Pensions Moneyfacts.

More: Is Your Endowment A Letdown?

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 16:58 on May 02 2008, Prof103 said:

I and others over the last year have received a surprisingly good terminal bonus on maturation of our endowment policies. One cannot say of course whether this will continue.

But I consider if someone is willing to pay handsomely for an endowment, then they must be worth something more. Hence I hold until maturation for ones with short remaining life.

Best

Prof103

At 07:09 on May 06 2008, Terence1999 said:

In my opinion ditching your endowment is NOT a good idea, unless you can no longer afford the premiums - in which case you should sell it, not ditch it.

THere now exists a healthy market for "partly used" endowment policies, where individuals will offer to take over the premiums (and the terminal benefits) from others who want rid of their policies.

This is a market like any other, where buyers and sellers meet to establish a "fair value" (i.e. acceptable to both sides) at which they will trade an asset. So if you already have an endowment policy, you can get a fair value for it at any time by selling it on this market. Alternatively, if your investment profile leads you to want to have a bit of life insurance packaged with some investments managed by a life assurance company on your behalf, then you can likewise purchase a whole selection of endowments with (almost) whatever maturity suits.

No matter that the "fair value" of your endowment may be significantly different from what you expected it to be by now at the time when you bought it back in the 80s - that is the joy of risky investments - your investments in Sir Clive Sinclair and Bill Gates have similarly turned out differently to what you might have hoped ...

So if all you can get for your endowment is a fair market value, you should only stop paying the premiums and sell the policy if you have a better savings home for your money.

IMHO

At 09:03 on May 06 2008, bluepiper61 said:

IS there not also the possibility of stopping paying into your endowment, but keep it running until the end of its term? That way you shouldn't suffer any termination penalties, but the payments could be diverted into a better savings vehicle (ISA etc) to help pay off your mortgage when required.

At 10:15 on May 06 2008, IDPickering said:

Best thing we ever did was ditch our endowment held with Standard Life. It was for 25 years but we bailed out at 15 years after making a claim, and winning, for miss-selling against them.

Now we're on a nice easy trouble free fixed repayment mortgage and can sleep at night with no worries.

At 11:00 on May 06 2008, Penniless101 said:

Ok, so endowments sold in the 80s were generally a bad thing - that's a given. I went through the prescribed process of complaint and got my mortgage reduced by £6,000. Which was nice. However, I then transferred my mortgage to repayment only and have kept the endowment as a savings account. Why, you may ask, given the pitiful annual return? It's the terminal bonus. A huge carrot, dangling just 5 years away from me now; no way would I pass that up! Also, the policy acts as an extra bit of life assurance, so it remains very worthwhile to me.
I would urge people to check for such details before selling or (worse still) ditching their endowment policy. While the ethos of endowment policies isn't valid in the current economic climate, you may still be "cutting off your nose to spite your face" if you don't keep it.

At 11:10 on May 06 2008, alanev100 said:

We sold our endowments last November on the TEP exchange at fairly good prices. The reasons for this were fourfold...
1st - The investment scenario looked poor and thus I don't think Fund Managers will be able make upper-projection returns ever again...
2nd - We were able to deposit the funds against our Offset Mortgage, thus saving interest at a grossed-up rate of nine pct!..
3rd - we don't have to pay any more premiums, thus being able to pay down more mortgate each month and...
4th - We have organised cheaper life assurance that reduces in line with our anticpated pay-down in mortgage...
I think this is a no-brainer! A

At 11:46 on May 06 2008, Swill453 said:

However, I then transferred my mortgage to repayment only and have kept the endowment as a savings account. Why, you may ask, given the pitiful annual return? It's the terminal bonus. A huge carrot, dangling just 5 years away from me now; no way would I pass that up!

The terminal bonus isn't an on/off switch, if you were to surrender or sell the policy now you would get an element of it.

That's not to say you should get rid, but the decision isn't as simple as you imagine.

Scott.

At 13:09 on May 06 2008, jap220171 said:

The article and comments all presume that endowments held are With Profits Policies. I sold endowments for years and still have 3 separate endowments (2 linked to the mortgage).

All mine are invested in funds, not With Profits as even 15 years ago I always believed that With Profits Terminal Bonuses put too much control in the hands of the Insurance Company. At least invested in funds I have the benefit of being invested in the stock market and therefore gives less control to someone else in deciding my final values. Whilst the stock market has been depressed over the last few years, I have continued with my endowments in the hope and expectation that at some point the stock market must regain its losses, and then the value of the units I bought whilst the market was low will help my endowment catch up to where it needs to be.

At 13:19 on May 06 2008, sweetlikehoney said:

I work in Financial Services, and every day, somebody new is complaining to me about how much money they've 'lost' on their endowment compared to the target amount.
I only wish articles like this were more widely read, as they highlight the importance of independant advice, and direct individuals to what they can work out for themselves, which we can't do.

At 13:27 on May 06 2008, Swill453 said:

I work in Financial Services, and every day, somebody new is complaining to me about how much money they've 'lost' on their endowment compared to the target amount.

With good reason, too, as back in the 80s thousands were misled by (usually) their lender or someone introduced to them by their lender to expect the target amount.

We're a lot more sophisticated now (or is it jaded?).

Scott.

At 16:58 on May 06 2008, jap220171 said:

"At 13:27 on May 06 2008, Swill453 said:

I work in Financial Services, and every day, somebody new is complaining to me about how much money they've 'lost' on their endowment compared to the target amount.

With good reason, too, as back in the 80s thousands were misled by (usually) their lender or someone introduced to them by their lender to expect the target amount.

We're a lot more sophisticated now (or is it jaded?).

Scott."



I am sorry. I have worked in Financial Services for nearly 15 years, and I do not believe a large proportion of the misselling claims. Aside from the fact that not one of the endowments that I have sold has had a claim for misselling upheld, the customers that I have seen since know that they really weren't missold. I have annecdotal evidence from dozens of mortgage customers who complained about their endowments. Without fail they all claim that they knew at the outset that there were no guarantees. The reasons they sought compensation was firstly because everyone in the FSA and the press were tellng them how easy it was to seek compensation, being an almost guaratnteed payout, but more importantly they sought compensation because it had not performed as well as they had expected. That is not misselling.

I will concede that some, albeit a small minority, may have been missold, but the majority were not. When I sold my first endowment, the regulator (LAUTRO) set out the guidline interest rates that we had to show on the illustration as being 4%, 6% and 8%. They also stipulated the wording in vital clauses - things like Past Performance is no indicator of future performance. We could not put on quotations and suggestion of guarantees.

However, in over 8 years of helping people with their mortgages, I have come to realise that when people are buying a house, and are in a hurry to avoid losing that dream property, they neither listen to or read the information that is being given to them.

Was there a tendancy for an entire industry to missell endowments, or was it that the customers were not really paying attention to the information provided? When the stockmarket was bouyant no-one complained; the second that returns started to fall, there had to be someone to blame.

We have it now again with house prices. When everything is riding high, all is well. When we hit a dip as we always will, someone must be to blame, whether it is the banks for lending too much money, or the estate agents for selling the properties or the surveyors for valuing them. God forbid that the consumer take a little bit of responsibility for their own actions.

At 18:52 on May 06 2008, jimdrudge said:

Another two points to consider are the time until maturity and whether the provider has given a minimum amount they will pay at maturity.
From there - if you have been saving to fill the shortfall - its a matter of balancing off the benefits of the insurance, the minimum amount you will receive and what you might get from selling the endowment, making other insurance arrangements and switching to a repayment mortgage.

At 01:40 on May 07 2008, nickthecrip said:

Contributors here seem to know a bit about what is being discussed. Personally, I have little knowledge or experience of many financial matters like these. One thing did strike me in the article though, about MVR's & how too much had been paid out in previous years-how does this equate with what is going on with Norwich Union (Prudential is another)regarding 'Inherited Estates' & reattribution, money that has accumulated from profits not paid out to policyholders in the past & amounting to some £15 BILLION!
I have just received my notice of annual bonus, from a different company, with a bonus of 0%, as it has been for a couple of years now. If I surrender this policy now, I will probably not even get my contributions back. How is one to make a decision though, when the figures & indications are not fully understood and most advisers are seemingly too afraid to give a definite opinion one way or another for fear of being sued if it should turn out not to be the best advice? I feel that the vast majority of purchasers of financial products do NOT understand them at all-that's why they go to an advisor in the first place. To say I am confused is a massive understatement!

At 11:03 on May 07 2008, andymossy said:

It is really important to point out that selling is a real option over surrender. I am staggered that not enough so called financial advisors are not aware of the secondary market and more often than not just talk a bout surrendering when they write an endowment related piece.
There are market makers like AAP for instance who could potentially but your endowment for more money than the surrender value. Only certain plicies will qualify, but getting a quote is free and there are no charges for the change of owner. Yes, the life cover is something that people need to take on board, as this will be transferred to the new owner.

At 11:54 on May 07 2008, Swill453 said:

There are market makers like AAP for instance who could potentially but your endowment for more money than the surrender value. Only certain plicies will qualify, but getting a quote is free and there are no charges for the change of owner. Yes, the life cover is something that people need to take on board, as this will be transferred to the new owner.

The cover isn't transferred, but the payout is.

If you die, the purchaser gets their payout earlier (providing they or the insurance company finds out).

Scott.

At 09:27 on May 09 2008, Rippedoff51 said:

What is the difference between a Full and low cost Endowment? Only the amount of premium invsted for growth!

It is well to remember that at the point of sale purchasers were told that Endowment policies would mature at Double the face value for 10 year policies, 3xT =15, 4xT =20yr, 5xT = 25yr etc,etc. The FOS said that it would not take expectations into account when investigating the mis-selling of endowments policies. Yet that is exactly what people were expecting a good return on investment, what has happened to the profits made by the various companies? Lautro the for runner of the FOS was giving advice in 1988 on investment return in doubble digits, yet this seems to have been swept under the carpet! De-mutualisations who has profoted, the executives have done very well for themselves,but, not the policy holders that is evident?
The Zombie funds have made a packet, not the policy holders
So I feel RIPPED OFF!

At 22:11 on May 09 2008, 7of9sLovechild said:

I have a with profits endowment with CGU/NU. I pay over £1000pa into it, and had 1 year where the bonus was zero and one where it was £17.50. My understanding is that terminal bonuses are based on previous bonuses, so I would need a terminal bonus of several 10s of thousands per cent to get close to making up my predicted £22,000 shortfall. At 13 years into my 25 year term the surrender value is still only worth 90% of what I have paid in!

By the way its not all good news on their plan to sell off the family silver either (just in case any of us were still niave enough to think it might be). The company made a 'promise' several years ago to 'top up' policies to a minimum amount on completion of term. When I questioned them about this 'windfall' that may be coming our way over the next 1/2/3 years, I was told that it would be 'absorbed' into the calculations. In other words if they promised you £10k, and your policy only made £6k they would top up the other £4k. However if you 'benefit' from payment over the next 3 years of £3K, they will only top up with an additional £1k. So basically, they are using the first portion of the inherited estate to give you what they had already promised you anyway. Still it could be worse, they could have taken the whole lot to reattribution, in which case we may have only got 10% of the value.

If any recruitment consultants are reading this I would like to offer up my cv. I have absolutely no experiance as a fund manager, but can promise to give returns at least as good as the building societies (that I would invest in). I would not lose millions of pounds every year, but if I did I would not expect a huge bonus. Nor would I expect a golden handshake when you sack me for being cr@p... Sorry, I guess I'm really not qualified for this job am I?

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Your Money? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Latest Stories

© Copyright 1998-2008, The Motley Fool Limited. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only.
The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool, Inc.
Place of Reg: England & Wales. Company Reg No: 3736872. VAT Reg No: 735 7818 01. Registered Office: 30 Great Pulteney Street, London W1F 9LT.


USEQ\EQWEB08