Skip Navigation

Students: Prepare For Price Hikes!

<%=this._contentDocument.Byline%>
By Laura Starkey | 29 April 2008

Anyone who's graduated from University in the past few years probably has pretty strong opinions on the funding of higher education (HE).

Personally, I can't say I'm thrilled about the bill for almost £20,000 that landed on my doormat this month - a bill which, thanks to recent increases in student loan interest rates, I'm unlikely to make much of a dent in this year.

And while I'm old enough to have escaped them, the introduction of top-up fees for English and Welsh students back in 2006 was a political hot potato for many reasons... Not least because Labour's 2001 election manifesto pledged that they wouldn't be brought in.

A ‘Progressive' System

That said, the current higher education funding system in England is still considered to be one of the most progressive in the world.

Students are able to pay for the cost of their degrees after graduation, and there is financial aid available so that, in theory, anyone can go to university - regardless of their family's income. 

However, giving students the hefty loans they need for tuition and living costs means the average graduate leaves university with debts of £12,363. 

Moreover, a new report from the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) suggests we could be on the cusp of a new - and serious - row over higher education funding.

The 2009 Review

A review of university funding for England and Wales is due to be commissioned in 2009. Unsurprisingly, some likely opponents have already started squaring up to fight.

Lord Dearing, the politician who recommended the introduction of tuition fees in 1997, suggested last summer that the cap of £3,000 on tuition fees should be lifted at the review.

Like many others, he argues English universities need more revenue if they are to stay competitive and retain their reputation for excellence.

And while the NUS state their opposition to the introduction of ‘market forces' into higher education, HEPI confirm the 2006 top-up fees have not gone far enough to fill the hole in HE funding. 

The report also makes clear that the current system of student support is already costing the taxpayer enough.

At the moment, student loans and grants cost the government around £1.4bn per year, and according to HEPI it is unlikely that any government would be prepared to increase this. Extra money for universities will therefore need to come from somewhere else.

Four Options

HEPI outline four possible ‘options' from which a government might choose to help universities financially.

While all have their pros and cons, not one of them rules out raising the cap on tuition fees. Rather, all four accept that the fee ‘cap' will probably be raised to either £5,000 or £7,000 per year.

Differences between the four options relate to how students might pay the extra tuition fees charged - particularly those from lower-income families.

Ideas range from increasing the amount of government-subsidised loan available, to asking that students take out ‘top-up' loans for expensive courses at real rates of interest.

There's only one option that won't involve all students paying significantly more for their degree courses. It would require universities to waive fees above a certain level for students whose parents can't afford to pay.  

But let's face it - with the universities clamouring for more cash, they're unlikely to fall in love with that one.

Overall, the HEPI document makes for pretty depressing reading. A £7,000 fee cap could mean a £12,000 increase in the cost of a three-year degree course - so overnight, the cost of becoming a graduate could go up by 133%!

To me, it seems clear that funding a degree in future could leave many young people with huge, mortgage-style debts.

Conversely, it's unclear how students - particularly those whose parents cannot help them financially - will cope with this.

What Can You Do?

If you or a member of your family is planning to go to university, there are things you can do now to help prepare for it.

Depending on how soon the course is due to start, it's crucial to find out what government support you or your child is entitled to, and how you can apply for it.

Directgov offer information and advice about many aspects of higher education, so this is a good place to start. Also, it's worth checking out our Student Finances Discussion Board. Here, fellow Fools share their wisdom on everything from cutting the cost of textbooks to finding bargain booze (obviously a key student concern!).

If you can, it's a great idea to save up as much money as possible in advance of going (or sending someone) to university. Saving regularly in a Cash ISA is a great way to put pounds aside without the taxman interfering.

And if you're pregnant or have recently had a baby, using his or her Child Trust Fund to build up a higher education hoard would be a good move. It might seem premature while you're still changing nappies, but in my opinion it's never too early to start collecting cash for university costs.

It's also vital that prospective university students learn to budget. Knowing how to live within your means is a skill I think we should all acquire before setting foot in a hall of residence.

Whatever changes are made to HE funding in 2009, they're likely to be expensive - and the one thing students really won't be able to afford is economic ‘ignorance'.

Starting to save and learning some basic finance lessons now are probably the only real ways to keep down the cost of that cap and gown in years to come.

More: A Monster Guide To Student Finances | Money Talk: Financial Survival Tips For Students

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 10:33 on April 30 2008, SF142 said:

I'm a student and already in debt up to £7K with one more year to go. If I havent read this I would not have known their report and further I read it more depressed I get. I do not understand how these 'advisors' come up with this kind of 'recommendations' just by looking at the statistics. They really should go to uni's & meet student to understand their concerns, not everyone is party crazy!!

At 10:48 on April 30 2008, TMFLaura said:

Hey there SF142... I sympathise!

The good news is that these new rules (should they come into being) shouldn't affect you. It's future generations of students who will have to worry about raised fees and bigger loans.

In the meantime, it's good to see you're using The Fool to help make the most of your money.

Good luck with your studies... And your budgeting!

At 11:01 on April 30 2008, hungary said:

I am a mature student, with student debt that is plain scary and I am not even finished! TO add insult to injury, if you are on Housing Benefit whilst 'enjoying' a student loan, this is treated as income, eventhough it is a loan and it is compound interest! Now my eldest is in 6th Form and looking forward to university. I can't face the thought of her being saddled by similar debts, whilst student unions just seem to encourage the students to get drunk all the time. How on earth dare these advisory bodies lend people with these huge debts, whilst they themselves enjoyed the grant-era?
I cannot support my children through uni, does this mean they'll have a life-long debt for the sake of a degree?

At 11:56 on April 30 2008, Littlemog said:

Luckily I'll probably be out of uni by the time that comes in, but it's still hugely unfair. £7000 a year tuition, plus £3000 a year maintenance loan, brings up £30,000 of debt by the time you're done.

Not to mention the £3000 loan doesn't cover most people's rent (at an around £300 a month for most people I know, Surrey/Hants) so whoever thinks students can afford to party (without getting into trouble with credit cards and the like) is sorely mistaken, and that stereotype is hugely damaging to us.

They can say "but you'll earn more money at the end!" as much as they like, but in the end if you send you children to uni you'll suffer from being in the higher wage bracket. The fairness can be debated with it only affecting the availability of the grant and having the same amount of debt at the end, but when it's a £7000 difference of what you actually pay to study?

It's going to hurt those whose parents are in the middle - or who are just over the wage bracket but have multiple children.

This might stop people that go to uni "because it's the done/expected of us thing" and doing a degree that leads to a limited field of work they don't want to do, but it's making the rest of us suffer.

And I assume the loan goes on your credit rating too? I'm sure £30,000 of unpaid debt doesn't look good on there, nevermind if you choose to go into postgraduate education which you have to fund yourself?

At 12:30 on April 30 2008, jofc said:

This would be the ideal way to make those doing media studies degrees subsidise real subjects (e.g. engineering & science), but alas all I can see is fees for engineering & science being forced ever higher & even less students taking the courses as they are too expensive.

At 13:05 on April 30 2008, justb said:

I am well paid and hopefully my daughter will leave university without huge debts but this will not be the case for other students. I was privileged enough (or should I say old enough)to go to university when there were such things as automatic student grants with no need to repay anything. (The current members of the government also benefitted from this system.) Without that I would not have been able to go (my parents were very poor). The thought of starting my working life with such huge debts would without doubt have put me and my parents off such a thing. Debt is more scary when you are poor. I know we have a different attitude to debt these days, but I dont envy graduates who have to find a job and fund a house and repay this loan. What a depressing thought. I have been a Labour supporter all my life but this and the tax changes have definitely caused a rethink.

At 16:15 on April 30 2008, mcginge said:

May I point out that tuition fees are no longer capped at 3000, as of september they will rise again to 3145. What happened to the capping?
Also I'm am so sick of parents complaining that their kids wont go to uni, my mum is a single parent and cant afford to help me out (household income way below the threshold)but I'm still doing a course. It's not my mum's debt it's mine!
Another thing, I get less financial aid from student loans with my grant and loan than a student from a high income family gets with their loan, £300 quid less. Doesn't sound much but it's a months rent.
I'm just finishing my second year, I've got one more left and then my pgce. I will leave higher education with almost £30000 debt (more than 1.5 times the yearly salary for an nqt). Forget AimHigher, they're pricing people out of education.

At 17:32 on April 30 2008, Littlemog said:

Mcginge, really? The loan for someone from a high income family is something like £3000, or £3300, whereas people I know (single parent situation also) get £2700 loan and £3000 or so grant on top of it.

I'm not saying "people who can't pay for it should!" or anything - but £7000's a bit much of a difference.

It's strange, because Labour wanted what, 50% of young people to go into higher education, and now they're hiking the fees?

On a side note, if anything's gone wrong with your course I've heard (when we put in a complaint to our uni) that you can only get £2000 back in compensation (if you complain within the uni) If you started before 2006 then you'll get your full £1000-odd tuition back, but if you started after that you'll only get £2000 of your £3000 tuition. Would this be the same if you paid £7000?

And will they be adjusting the rate at which you start paying your loan back, and the waiver after so-many years?

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Your Money? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Latest Stories

© Copyright 1998-2008, The Motley Fool Limited. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only.
The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool, Inc.
Place of Reg: England & Wales. Company Reg No: 3736872. VAT Reg No: 735 7818 01. Registered Office: 30 Great Pulteney Street, London W1F 9LT.


USEQ\EQWEB08