Skip Navigation
 

The £100 Billion Pensions Bonanza!

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

How To Bag A Bargain This Christmas

Published in Retirement & Pensions on 17 July 2008

From October, a near-monopoly on these pensions will end, giving six million people greater control over their retirement.

Pensions. Yawn, dull, what a bore, right? Wrong, because I have some really welcome news which will benefit over six million people! I’ll start by getting the technical stuff out of the way, and then explain why this is such good news for workers.

S2P and ‘protected rights’ pensions

As well as your basic state pension, there is another state pension which you accrue during your working life: the State Second Pension, or S2P. Prior to April, 2002, S2P was known as the State Earnings-Related Pension Scheme (SERPS), which was introduced in 1978. How much extra pension you receive from S2P and SERPS depends on your earnings during your working life and your National Insurance contributions (NICs).

However, some workers have chosen to ‘contract out’ of S2P and/or SERPS by opting out of these schemes. In return, they receive an NIC refund which can be paid into their company scheme or a special type of personal pension. The problem with contacted-out rebates is that these payments, plus their investment returns, must be kept inside what’s known as a ‘protected rights’ pension. (However, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) intends to abolish contracting-out from April 2012.)

Protected rights: a £100-billion rip-off

If your contracted-out rebates have not been paid into your company pension scheme, then they will be held inside a protected-rights plan. In fact, of the total of £440 billion invested in UK personal pensions, almost a quarter (23%) -- £100 billion -- is tied up in protected-rights plans. With six million holders, this means that the average protected-rights pension is worth around £16,500.

The big problem with protected-rights pensions is that they have performed very poorly when compared with new-style pension plans and other mainstream investment vehicles. Here’s how the average pension fund has underperformed the average for unit trusts and OEICs (two popular types of investment fund):

 

No. of years

UT/OEIC outperformance

versus pension fund (%)

Five

12

Ten

22

Fifteen

69

 

Source: Lipper, total return to 01/02/08

As you can see, over the past fifteen years, the average unit trust/OEIC has grown almost seven-tenths (69%) more than the average pension fund. Indeed, thanks to their poor investment returns and high charges, private pensions have failed millions of workers. The insurance companies running them have a lot to answer for!

From October: greater choice, control and freedom

So, most protected-rights pensions have been pretty awful. However, investors can do nothing about this, because they cannot transfer these funds into one of the new generation of low-cost pensions. For example, protected-rights funds cannot be transferred into a cheap DIY pension known as a SIPP (Self-invested Personal Pension).

Now for the good news [drum roll]: from October, the rule preventing protected-rights funds from being invested in SIPPs will be scrapped. Although this is potentially catastrophic news for insurance companies, it is great news for workers, who will finally be able to take full control of their contracted-out pensions.

Personally, I’m delighted at this news. Although this obscure rule change may not seem like big news, it means that, later this year, I can finally take control of money I have sitting in a poorly performing protected-rights pension plan. Despite being invested in the stock market for seventeen years, this fund has grown by under 6% a year, which is a terrible result.

Hence, as soon as October arrives, I will transfer this under-performing pension into my ultra-low-cost Vantage SIPP from Hargreaves Lansdown. I will then be able to choose exactly where to invest my money, aiming to improve on its poor investment returns to date. At last, I can have all of my personal pensions in one place, and under my complete control. Hurray!

In summary, if your protected-rights pot is invested in a poorly performing insurance fund, then consider switching it to a SIPP. This will allow you to choose from thousands of different funds and other investments and, at the same time, reduce your ongoing charges.

For example, a fund worth £16,500 growing at 5% a year would be worth £36,000 after twenty years. However, a yearly return of 7% would boost your pot to £52,000. So, in this example, switching to a better-performing fund making 2% a year more produces an extra £16,000 after two decades. That’s a lot of money for an hour’s work!

Many thanks to Tom McPhail of Hargreaves Lansdown for his help with this article.

More: Visit The Fool’s pensions hub page | A New Way To Boost Your Pension Income | Get More From Old Pensions

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Dhahran2001 20 Jul 2008, 7:29am

At last, I can have all of my personal pensions in one place. Hurray!

I have reasons to believe Hargreaves Lansdown is a good firm; however, many people believed BCCI was also good and some put ALL their savings with that banking institution!!

It is NOT a good idea to put all your eggs in one basket; it is better to share between two.

jheenan1 20 Jul 2008, 8:00am

This is great news. I can actually put my pension in my pension, hoooray! I have researched SIPPS a great deal before buying one. If you want to buy a couple of trackers once a year then SIPPDEAL is best. There are NO annual, monthly, inactivity charges, just 10-30£ per trade. An alternative is the motley fools own SIPP which has a low fixed charge and £10 per trade. Finally HL which is often touted as the best, but I didagree, certainly cost wise

1066girl 20 Jul 2008, 8:58am

Ok you are going to have to forgive me here because I find the whole pension thing totally baffling!

How do I KNOW if I have one of these formerly serps now S2p pots? My main employment has been as a teacher -across 2 different pension schemes - and just about to begin work in the NHS. My working life has been pretty disrupted by health problems and by changing career pathway midstream, and I am frankly worried about my pension. However I am also not in a position to do much about it right now in the way of buying added years or anything like that. Is this something that is likely to apply to me where I can do something to improve my prospects without much outlay of cash right now?

AdAstra100 20 Jul 2008, 9:01am

Hi Cliff,

'If your contracted-out rebates have not been paid into your company pension scheme, then they will be held inside a protected-rights plan.'
I like the enthusiasm but the devil is in the detail and people, including me - a reasonably aware investor - glaze over because the detail is almost impossible to uncover or comprehend. Just try looking for the Old Age Pension rules for husbands and wives who have both made significant NI contributions. I haven't found a Government advaice document yet which covers the 'whole' couple entitlement issue clearly. Anyway my questions are:
1.How do I know if my contract out rebates were or were not paid into my company pension scheme?
2,I am 62 but retired, will any protected rights pension be payable from aged 65? Or am drawing it know as part of my company pension?
3.Can I transfer my protected rights pot out and invest it even if I am not working and if it is still there?
4.I also have a SERPs element, gained from time employed when I was contracted in but that is payable at 65? So why would my Protected rights pension element not be held back by my company pension scheme until 65?
5. Who holds the Protected rights pension pot, the various companies I have worked for or Insurance companies I don't know about?

Headlines are fine but real benefits are not so easy to establish.

Regards

AdAstra100

themonty56 20 Jul 2008, 10:29am

i was medically retired in 2007 at the age of 51 will this affect my pension atall

matchmade 20 Jul 2008, 12:56pm

This is great news - I thought it might be coming but where was the publicity until the Fool stepped in?

The great advantage of this change is that anyone with a protected rights pension can transfer it to a SIPP, and finally you can have your pension lump sum all in one place, with transparent charges and returns. I would urge anyone with a protected rights pension tied up with a former employer to transfer it to a SIPP under their control: I simply don't trust the employer not to go bust, or for the amateurs who are appointed as trustees to monitor adequately the investment performance of the fund. Company pensions are fundamentally designed to protect the interests of the existing pensioners, so the investment approach is deeply conservative, heavily weighted in recent years towards income-generating bonds, and therefore operating against the interests of the majority of people who will be retiring in 10,20 or 30 years time and want to invest for growth. Get your money out and under your control, so you can invest for the long-term, just as you do when buying a house or investing in unit or investment trusts.

lesley13 20 Jul 2008, 12:58pm

I started a SIPP with Standard Life last year, it has performed terribly.An initial pot of £162k is now worth about £130k. Is this a fault of the fund or my financial adviser ? Has the Vantage SIPP from Hargreaves Lansdown performed better or is this not a simple question ?

Karada 20 Jul 2008, 2:09pm

Most of the Pension companies should be investigated for ripping us off. In the early 1980's I had a pension fund which had been built up in a contributory fund with Unilever. I was persuaded to transfer it into a Pension policy with Guardian Royal Exchange who gave me figures assuming 6% growth which at retirement age in 2009 would give me a cash lump sum of £103,000 and a pension of £12,000 a year. Since then they were taken over several times and it is now Guardian Assurance. Their performance has been dreadful. My projection for next year is now no lump sum, 0% terminal bonus and a pension of £4,000 a year. The bonus added this year was a measly £3.76. It would have done better in a current account paying 0.1% interest.
Can I get an investigation started to see what they have done with my money?

abrahamisaacs 20 Jul 2008, 3:24pm

Many of the comments above are disturbing and show how badly informed most people are about their pensions. The concepts and terminology are off-putting but easy to understand once you know what they mean (googling may help). To make matters worse, pension trustees tend to report to their members only once a year with accounts (which often summarise the detail with lots of glossy pictures and could easily be mistaken for junk mail) that are several months out of date. And the trustees themselves are often retired shop floor staff, or union reps, or HR managers who, despite their undoubted skills in other areas, are clueless about fund management. If it helps anyone, here is how I am handling my pension needs: (1) kept all my pensions letters from various funds, and collapsed them all into a SIPP (took about 3 months to do this) (2) started buying houses and renting them out IN CASE my SIPP doesn't meet my needs.

jeremy15 21 Jul 2008, 12:13am

I have two company pensions,1 is a default pension from sainsburys,when my present company was owned by them but it now costs them a large fortune to keep it open,my present company which due to company rules I can not place on the net is on a stake holder pension does this pension and the sainsburys pension include with the above article?if so please email me thank you your site is very helpful with lots of good advice.

philtheifa 21 Jul 2008, 10:16am

Firstly, check that a SIPP is the appropriate vehicle to use. They may accept just about anything in to them but the charges tend to reflect this flexibility.
Secondly, most "wrap" platform pensions (such as Transact) have been able to take protected rights payments and offer the full range of unit trusts, OEICs, etc at highly discounted prices.
Thirdly, "my pension fund has fallen; should I sue the pension company?". This sums up the general ignorance most people have about investing. Investments represent risk - values can go up and/or down. If they go down it is always somebody else's fault. The pension company doesn't move the markets - it follows the investment mandate that YOU gave THEM! If you are unhappy, change the mandate or change the pension company.
And, finally "Insurance companies have ripped us off for ages!". So have motor manufacturers, drugs companies, banks, gas and electricity suppliers, petrol companies, governments........You could argue that capitalism is all about ripping people off because a profit is made (cost charged is greater than cost incurred).

mickgjames 22 Jul 2008, 11:46am

"Has the Vantage SIPP from Hargreaves Lansdown performed better or is this not a simple question?"

A Sipp makes you your own investment manager, so whether this is a responsibility you want to take on or not is up to you. Whether the fund then outperforms the market depends on the quality of your decision making.

lesley13 24 Jul 2008, 6:14pm

With regard to my SIPP it is with Standard Life and is their dynamic distribution fund I have no idea what it is invested in !!! Are other people in the same position of not knowing what the fund represents

chrisall 28 Jul 2008, 10:12pm

I was persuaded to transfer it into a Pension policy with Guardian Royal Exchange who gave me figures assuming 6% growth which at retirement age in 2009 would give me a cash lump sum of £103,000 and a pension of £12,000 a year. Since then they were taken over several times and it is now Guardian Assurance. Their performance has been dreadful

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=pension+misselling&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

realist2008 29 Jul 2008, 8:45am

Hmm, there's some good questions in here! The confusion continues.

My question: If all my pensions can now be collected into a single SIPP (run, say, by Hargreaves Landsdown), what protects me from a BCCI / Equitable life fiasco?

Surely we need to diversify our pensions - with all that entails, ie some gains, some losses?

daisy138 30 Jul 2008, 6:59pm

If you were contracted-out of SERPS/S2P through a final salary company scheme, it's probable that rebates (as such) were not 'paid into' your scheme. Rather, there was an NI saving to both employer and employee during the period of membership. A pension amount equal to the SERPS/S2P pension for the period will form part of your overall entitlement.
The best thing to do is write to the administrators of the scheme, asking for an update of your entitlements and a cash equivalent transfer value if you're thinking of transferring your benefits away from the scheme. But think carefully before moving benefits out of a final salary scheme which normally provides a package of benefits and doesn't normally have admin charges.

hughbaker 01 Oct 2008, 9:42am

I heard there was one other factor to consider in transferring to a SIPP: the proportion of your pension pot that you are allowed to withdraw tax free on retirement.

For occupational pension schemes, doesn't this proportion depend on the number of years service with that employer? I don't know what the formula is, but presumably there would therefore be a tax-benefit vs investment performance balance to be considered.

madjocko 18 Nov 2008, 9:59am

to ADASTRA 100 tune in to Working Lunch BBC2 12:30-1:00pm of Friday, theres usually a pensions expert on who is(in my opinion) very informative and breaks down info to a easily understandable manner.
Check BBC website for more information on this.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.