Skip Navigation
 

Give Your Pension An £11,000 Boost

Jane Baker
By Jane Baker | 9 July 2008

Inflation is bad news for everyone. But it’s particularly unwelcome if you’re on a fixed income, such as a pension.

This is because fixed-income pensioners will receive the same amount of cash, year in, year out - even though the prices of food, fuel and other everyday items are shooting through the roof.

So if you're coming up to retirement and have yet to take your pension benefits, how can you make sure you don’t go short?

There is one obvious answer: inflation-proof your pension income. 

Sounds simple... but how do you do it? And how much does it cost? 

Retirement rewards

First, let's look at what usually happens at retirement and why most pensioners are on fixed incomes:

When you take benefits from your pension, you’ll probably buy an annuity which converts the lump sum from your pension fund into an income. You only get one chance to buy an annuity, and once you buy it, you're committed for life.

Most people buy a ‘level’ annuity, which means the income they receive will stay exactly the same every year for the rest of their lives. 

An annuity which pays a level income might suit you perfectly well. Perhaps you have other sources of income from savings or investments which supplement your pension. Or -- if you’re lucky -- the income from your pension itself may be more than sufficient, so you don't need to protect it from the effects of inflation.

But for the not-so-lucky, you’ll need to think carefully about how to make sure inflation does not erode the income you draw from your pension.

The most competitive annuity today will see a pension pot of £100,000 provide you with a level income of around £7,920* a year for men and £7,420* a year for women.

But take a look at the figures below to see how inflation could destroy the value of your fixed income (in real terms) over the next 25 years:

How inflation could reduce your pension income

Starting pension value in 2008

Inflation increases by X% each year

Value of pension in real terms after 25 years in 2033

£7,920

2%

£4,779

£7,920

3%

£3,698

£7,920

4%

£2,854

£7,920

5%

£2,196

 

If inflation increases by 2% each year, your pension would be worth just £4,779 in real terms in 2033. And 2% may be a pretty conservative estimate, particularly since the government’s own measure of inflation -- the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) -- currently stands at 3.3%. 

If annual inflation leapt further this year, to 5%, and stayed at that level for the next 25 years, your pension income would reduce even more dramatically from £7,920 to just £2,196 in real terms.

Of course, it’s impossible to predict how inflation will behave over the long-term. But even when inflation is low, it will still drastically cut the purchasing power of your pension.

Index-linked annuities

This leads me back to inflation-proofing your income. Did you know you can buy an annuity which is index-linked to protect your income from the effects of inflation? Index-linked annuities rise in line with the Retail Prices Index (RPI) -- which currently stands at 4.3% -- rather than the CPI.

These annuities sound great in theory, but there’s one major drawback. The initial income you’ll receive will be significantly lower than a level annuity. For example, the most competitive index-linked annuity today -- bought with a £100,000 pension pot -- will provide an income of just £4,815* for men and £4,425* for women. This is around £3,000 (40%) less than an equivalent level annuity.

That might seem like a lot of money to give up just to inflation-proof your income. That said, if you survive to reach average life expectancy (or beyond), an index-linked annuity may actually pay out more overall than a level annuity.

Let's say you are a man with a £100,000 pension pot. For the first 12 years, you will receive a higher annual income from the level annuity than you would receive from the equivalent index-linked annuity. 

But after those 12 years have passed, the situation is reversed. You would then start to receive a higher annual income from the index-linked annuity than from the equivalent level annuity. And this will remain the case for the rest of your life. 

So if you lived less than 13 years after you had bought your annuity, you would definitely have been better off with the level annuity. But if you lived for 13 years or longer, you might have wished you had gone for an index-linked annuity instead.

What’s more, an index-linked annuity would prove better value over the long-term. After 25 years, the index-linked annuity would have paid out almost £209,000, while the level annuity (at £7,920) would only provide a total of £198,000 -- or £11,000 less -- over the same period.  

That said, for the total payout from the index-linked annuity to exceed that received from the level annuity, you would have to live until you reach the age of 87 -- or 22 years after retirement. The risk is if you don't survive for that long, the level annuity would provide higher benefits overall.

On top of that, the RPI may be lower -- or indeed higher -- than 4.3% over the course of your retirement. If actual RPI inflation is lower, then the total payout from the index-linked annuity could fall below the benefits provided by the level annuity. 

If you're not convinced that index-linked annuities are good value, then you could buy an annuity which increases every year by a fixed percentage instead. This is an escalating annuity, and typically the income it provides increases by say, 3% or 5% a year. If this set increase is less than the current rate of inflation, the escalating annuity will be cheaper to buy than the index-linked annuity. 

Even so, depending on how inflation changes over time, the fixed percentage may prove high enough to beat inflation. That said, if inflation runs above the fixed percentage, your income will fall behind.

However -- just like index-linked annuities -- you will need to sacrifice some of the initial income you would have received had you chosen an equivalent level annuity. And again, there will be a crossover point where the income from the escalating annuity begins to exceed the payout from the level annuity.

Other ways to beat inflation

Index-linked annuities may be better value than level annuities in the long run. But when inflation is high, a low initial income could -- quite simply -- not be enough. Our own research at the Fool shows that the RPI measure may radically underestimate how inflation actually effects real people like you and me. If that concerns you, think about alternative ways of financing your retirement, such as equity release, an unsecured pension (also known as income drawdown) or a new third way annuity.

The latter two are both ways that you can leave part of your pension fund invested -- to combat inflation and hopefully provide capital growth -- while drawing an income at the same time. Read Increase Your Pension Income By £1,000 and A New Way To Boost Your Pension Income to find out more about these options.

Above all, it’s vital you make the right decision now about how you're going to finance your retirement over the long-term. Don't just take any old annuity, shop around and get the best one. Remember that, hopefully, you'll be on this earth for at least another 25 years or more... and so will inflation!

*Annuities shown are for an annuitant aged 65 who is in good health. No guarantees or income for a spouse/partner have been included.

More: How To Buy The Right Annuity | Will Your Postcode Affect Your Pension?

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 07:39 on July 10 2008, perrytoo said:

Why doesn't anyone ever mention unitised annuities? They rise (or fall) in line with the stock market, which, over time, is 2-3 times more than the RPI. I took out mine 5 years ago, when I was 54, and it's currently paying me 8% per year (of the initial sum).

At 07:57 on July 10 2008, comptroller99 said:

Contrary to popular opinion annuity providers, usually Insurance companies, are neither charlatans nor should they be charities.

Annuity payments are based upon very complex formulas extrapolating forward from current facts. The three principal ones being mortality, interest rates and expected inflation. By definition an Insurance company exists to make a profit, for two reasons, the obvious, and more narrow, one to satsify their shareholders, even if it is a mutual, and the wider one to ensure they can meet their liabilities. Therefore any actuary will take all of the available data and simply ensure that there is enough leeway to make a profit. It is highly unlikely that as a whole any individual Insurance company will make a lower profit on inflation linked annuities as oppossed to level ones.

Therefore your decision to take one is very simple, do I expect to live longer than average, I believe that a man aged 65 is expected to live until he is 78.2 years (there is a table on the Government Actuary's web-site), if you do because of good health family history etc, go for it, if not take the money now while you can!

After all two facts not mentioned above £11,000 over 25 years, after inflation has reduced it is only about a pint of beer a week, and, as I understand it the average pension pot is c.£32,000 making such decisions a lot less important in terms of their size.

At 08:13 on July 10 2008, Iniq said:

The author confuses things by referring to recent inflation rates in terms of the Government's concocted CPI, whereas most inflation-proofed pensions are linked to the well-established RPI.
-------------
Perrytoo suggests "unitised" (i.e., stock-market linked) pensions. Helpful but possibly too volatile for some. Why not consider a "with profits" annuity which offers similar possibility of future growth but in a smoother way. Some providers also provide a guaranteed minimum payout.

At 08:40 on July 10 2008, tonjt said:

Why not forget about annuities altogether, if you can? I thought the general view was that they offer pretty poor value? I prefer to have more control over my money, and to shop around for the best rates in ISAs and other investments that don't lock you in. Also, most of us are going to have to think about how to earn a modest income in our "retirement", at least until we are no longer fit enough to do so. Personally, I am thinking as much about what my "retirement job" will be as how I am going to invest my retirement pot. Relying on the state and annuities is just not going to cut it in the future, unless something changes to improve things significantly (let's face it -- unlikely).

At 08:53 on July 10 2008, mrTcrazyfool said:

Forget pensions! I work for a company that doesn't increase my annual salary by the level of inflation - so by the time I retire I should be well used to it. (to be fair though, they do provide me with a non contributary final salary pension - which, oddly enough is index linked - so it's not all bad)

At 09:11 on July 10 2008, breechers said:

Haven't done the sums, but what if one was disciplined enough to take a fixed annuity & invest the difference between that and an index linked alternative until such time as the latter caught up with the former. When (and if) that day arrives the investment could be used to make up future shortfalls.

At 09:15 on July 10 2008, ancientaviatior said:

I'm with tonjt on this one. I have recently retired and decided that my retirements job was to be my own Fund Manager. The interview was a bit tough, but I still got the job! When I was working full time I just did not have the time to faf around lookinf for the best interest reate/savings accounts etc. Now, I have all the time in the world and with the help of the internet and sites like Motley Fool and MoneySavingExpert.com I shift my pension pot around opening new "Good Deal" accounts, closing ones that no longer deliver and , generally, cherrypicking the best offers. I't about taking personal responsibility, which sadly seems to be lacking in our generation. We have been brouht up expecting someone else to "sort things out for us". I don't begrudge Insurance companies making huge profits, jut not out of my pocket, thank you.

At 09:26 on July 10 2008, Yousanem said:

Another point to bear in mind is the amount of money you will need as you age. Jane has chosen a 25 year span for her analysis. Well if I retire at 65, I plan to travel, ski, snorkel, drink and have a thoroughly good time with my freedom from work. When I get to 90, I think I'll do well to be dribbling into my cornflakes. The amount of money I need for a happy retirement will therefore decline, so a level annuity will work fine for me.

At 09:55 on July 10 2008, 1longbow said:

Its all well and good talking about opportunities for people about to retire what about those of us who have and face a future on a fixed income with the prospect of rising prices. Whay about some advise for us

At 10:03 on July 10 2008, Strebor19 said:

Looking at the figure given in this artical they have missed out one important consideration which in my way of thinking makes the Level Annuity the best option. The example gives the indexed linked annual pension as a full £3000 per year less to begin with, only getting to break even situation after about 12 years or so dependant on inflation. Well would it not be better to have the full near £8000 pension on day one and Save/Invest the extra £3000 yourself. That way you are no worse of than taking the Indexed linked Annuity and you still have access to the money to enjoy if you so wish. Indeed thinking about it you only need to save £1000 per year from the level pension to have the £11000(assuming no interest) ferrited away to cover the effects of inflation for the following 12 years. Indeed if the rules allowed I would rather have all the £100000 cash to invest myself, even at a modest 5% interest rate that is £5000 per year (which should be tax free with personal allowance) and you still have the £100000 to leave in your will. Its all a scam if you ask me. Indeed I have just done a quick spreadsheet calc, and you could have a pension of £6500 per year for 31 years before all the £100000 was used up at 5% interest. and as someone else said, if I make it to 96 years old I doubt I will care what happens to me! can you imagine how rubbish TV will be in 50 years time, which is about all you can by that age!

At 10:06 on July 10 2008, mickgjames said:

WHy put all you eggs in one basket? Lots of people have odd little pension schemes lying around--why not hold back on one or two to get a better annuity later or to take advantage of changing circumstances. Husbands and wives could take different strategies with their pots. And not all pension planning has to take place inside the pension structure, ISAs for instance offering tax-free income and control of your money. Falling property prices may even bring buy-to-let back as an investment which offers both a decent initial yield and a return closely linked to wage inflation.

At 10:39 on July 10 2008, JanetBBB said:

How can you tell people to invest in pensions when they have gone down so drastically this year? What are we supposed to do?

At 11:16 on July 10 2008, UnclePop said:

Following on from ancientaviatior - great idea about Finacially Advising yourself - I plan to do them same with AVC, ISAs (and hopefully still with a final salary pension) - I've read you have to buy an annuity but what do you have to do to create your own pension company and therefore issue your own annitites - to yourself? (I doubt this is what you did ancientaviatior but hats off if you did). This would allow us to manage our own money but still get the tax perk....we could then invest where we see fit and when. Even if we created our own company to run it - we could reap the profits rather than other pension comanies...and even skim some for management costs and bonuses?

At 11:42 on July 10 2008, djabbott said:

I'm contributing to a Personal Pension Plan with Standard Life, & I'm 2 years away from "retirement" at 65. SL's Rep. recently told me one alternative to selecting an Annuity is to go for "Income Drawdown"; this way as I understand it most of my "pot" stays with SL & such option might be OK if I can trust them to preserve or beat its retirement value.
However I see no mentions of Income Drawdown so far in the Motley Fool article or from correspondents. Can we please have the Motley Fool's comments on the overall merits - or otherwise - of Income Drawdown versus Annuity?

At 12:14 on July 10 2008, lesley13 said:

Regarding the post by djabbott income drawdown is mentioned in the original article under the heading 'other ways to beat inflation'. There are also articles about this and third way pensions on the motley fool site. I too have a Standard Life SIPP which I was intending to convert to income drawdown when necessary but I am dissapointed to see that it has decreased in value by about 15% since this time last year and who knows where is it heading. Also you have to consider what happens at 75. You then have to take out an annuity or an ASP, you need to look at the tax implications and IHT rules if going down this route.

At 12:16 on July 10 2008, Ofolaller said:

Wouldn't it be preferable to cash in your annuity fund as a lump-sum at retirement and invest it in a high-yielding savings bond of some sort?

Or perhaps this can't be done in UK? Pardon my ignorance. I'm familiar with the situation in another country, where the contributor to a retirement annuity fund has the option to receive it as a lump-sum at retirement age. (I don't mean early terminatation, which is brutally penalised by a paltry pay-out.)

At 12:27 on July 10 2008, Accountantsmum said:

I do agree with strebor... investing your pension pot whilst retaining ownership of the capital looks to me to be a sound option. If you die early, your family at least gets the cash instead of the insurance company.
Mind you, for me this is just theoretical. I'm retired and have a teacher's pension and a state pension which I deferred for four years and so got 32% more than I would have had at 60. Both are index linked, so I'm laughing. There are some advantages to having worked in a low paid profession after all!

At 14:02 on July 10 2008, pajakpytel said:

What can my parents do as they haveboth been retired for over to years. Would it be possible for them to change to an annuity or would it be too late for them?

At 15:16 on July 10 2008, TheHeroTheDavid said:

comptroller99 said:

"I believe that a man aged 65 is expected to live until he is 78.2 years "

This is purely average life expectancy.

Actually,if you survive to 65 at present that is 82.8, & for women 85.2. Furthermore, a 40 year old now reaching 65 in 25 years it will be 86.9 & 89.1 respectively.

Therefore the average amount of pension planning should be longer.

Accountantsmum is very lucky! Technically public employees are paid 10% more than private (ONS wages website), & add at least another 10% in pension contribution from the government than in the private sector.

This means a 40 year old teacher can retire at 60 having worked 38 years,& expect around 28 years more inflation proof pay at 38/60 times final salary (£19K) - plus the state pension of £4.7K.

Assuming they contribute 6% to pension, the teacher in the above example will receive exactly the same net income of just over £20K.

Joe private would have to put in £5.6K ayear over 40 years, or £9k over 30 years, with zero guarantee of the same return. The FTSE is still20% below its 1999 price.

What's worse is the government taxing pension dividend credits, & someones own saved pension not being regarded as part of their estate.

If you didn't save a penny had an absolute blast, & only rented, at 65 you'd have free council tax, free rent, & a disposable income of at least 7K for leisure & utilities.

Action for pension equality now!

At 17:24 on July 10 2008, McLeodC said:

It's not safe to make Yousanem's assumption that the older you get, the less money you need.
Younger, fitter, retired people can walk to the shops, drive themselves, use buses, shop around for bargains, even take a part-time job if they need extra cash.
Older, less able, people may be reliant on taxis; they may have extra heating and laundry costs; with fewer fit surviving friends to rely on, they may have to pay for carers or home-helps; most ruinously of all, they may have to go into residential care.
Being very old can be extremely expensive indeed!

At 22:05 on July 10 2008, 1Dee said:

I am a 50 year old woman and don't contribute to a pension scheme at all. The company I work for does have one but I have never been in a position to take up this "perk" as I need every penny every month just to pay cost of living bills. I do own my house along with my husband and the mortgage lender but can anybody tell me what is to become of me. My husband is self employed and at one time in his life contributed into a private pension scheme but hasn't done so for about 10 years as we just can't afford it. We are going to have to rely solely on the state pension (if my husband qualifies, he has been PAYE some time in his working life). What is there to look forward to for people like us?

At 16:50 on July 11 2008, wahwah1978 said:

Have any of you looked at the new "third way annuities", you put money or transfers in then get guaranteed lock ins on the value every year or three years - the companies providing this basically take all the risk? Something I am definitely considering they seem to be the way forward

At 07:39 on July 26 2008, tonytone1 said:

I am sad to read that 1DEE has never been in a position to start a pension. However nobody will start one for you - you have to grab the bull by the horns and go for it. I appreciate that money may be tight, but it will be tighter when you retire.

At 10:30 on August 04 2008, robnoblewarren said:

1Dee, here's a checklist of action:
1. Your husband's pension could be worth thousands of pounds more if you take care of it. Find out where it is invested by looking at your last valuation statement and find your fund performance on a website like morningstar.co.uk.
2. Realise that you're in charge of where this is invested in the world - the life company is simply investing where you say. So get a list of what other funds you can link to.
3. Analyse the annual charges. This page gives you more information how:
http://www.fee-only.net/sample/samplepage.asp?article=1235
Expect to find out you're paying 3% p.a.
4. Either stay put and change where you invest by switching to another fund, or move it all to maybe a SIP and invest in Gilts (the educational course at fee-only.net will help)
5. Make sure you have a full Basic State Pension - if not buy more years [think you need only 30 now]
6. Track all your spend and review it by category every three months to ask yourself if the way you are spending gives you the best chance of financial independence.
7. Using the same data, see how far you can go in getting the same lifestyle for less money. You'll be surprised what you can do. Our parents/grandparents did the same thing during the Depression and the Second WWW: that means we can do it too.

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please [log in] to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.